‘I am still unsure…’ – Spontaneous expressions of vaccine indecision on Mumsnet

IF 2.1
Zsófia Demjén , Vaclav Brezina , Tara Coltman-Patel , William Dance , Richard Gleave , Claire Hardaker , Elena Semino
{"title":"‘I am still unsure…’ – Spontaneous expressions of vaccine indecision on Mumsnet","authors":"Zsófia Demjén ,&nbsp;Vaclav Brezina ,&nbsp;Tara Coltman-Patel ,&nbsp;William Dance ,&nbsp;Richard Gleave ,&nbsp;Claire Hardaker ,&nbsp;Elena Semino","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2025.100122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vaccination programmes in 90 % of countries in the world have been affected by ‘vaccine hesitancy’. Childhood vaccinations are particularly important. Internationally, these vaccination rates have been declining, resulting in the resurfacing of communicable diseases previously considered eliminated. In this context, our paper examines parents’ unelicited expressions of vaccine indecision – dilemmas, hesitations and concerns related to vaccinating at the point of decision-making.</div><div>Our corpus-assisted discourse study combines discourse analysis and the qualitative and quantitative tools of corpus linguistics (text dispersion keywords and concordancing) to compare 422 Original Posts from the forum of the UK-based parenting website Mumsnet that outline vaccine indecision to vaccination discussions that do not involve decision-making difficulties. We examine what characterises authentic vaccine indecision in the localised context of Mumsnet users. Specifically, we analyse which vaccines Mumsnet users are undecided about; what concerns are linked to indecision specifically; and how such concerns are raised in a generally pro-vaccination online space. Our method combines the advantages of analysing large datasets with those of nuanced and localised qualitative analysis.</div><div>The vaccine that most consistently concerns parents is MMR. Concerns about other vaccines fluctuate with disease outbreaks and the introduction of new vaccines. The concerns linked to indecision specifically are mostly individual and vaccine-specific, and include the mode and timing of vaccinations, particular personal and family circumstances and a rather unspecific notion of side effects. Mumsnet users invite details about others' personal experiences to fill a need left by widely available general vaccine information. The implication is that health services may need to redirect resources from mass population level campaigns to more personalised and tailored approaches for parents who are hesitant about specific vaccines at particular points in time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266679912500005X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vaccination programmes in 90 % of countries in the world have been affected by ‘vaccine hesitancy’. Childhood vaccinations are particularly important. Internationally, these vaccination rates have been declining, resulting in the resurfacing of communicable diseases previously considered eliminated. In this context, our paper examines parents’ unelicited expressions of vaccine indecision – dilemmas, hesitations and concerns related to vaccinating at the point of decision-making.
Our corpus-assisted discourse study combines discourse analysis and the qualitative and quantitative tools of corpus linguistics (text dispersion keywords and concordancing) to compare 422 Original Posts from the forum of the UK-based parenting website Mumsnet that outline vaccine indecision to vaccination discussions that do not involve decision-making difficulties. We examine what characterises authentic vaccine indecision in the localised context of Mumsnet users. Specifically, we analyse which vaccines Mumsnet users are undecided about; what concerns are linked to indecision specifically; and how such concerns are raised in a generally pro-vaccination online space. Our method combines the advantages of analysing large datasets with those of nuanced and localised qualitative analysis.
The vaccine that most consistently concerns parents is MMR. Concerns about other vaccines fluctuate with disease outbreaks and the introduction of new vaccines. The concerns linked to indecision specifically are mostly individual and vaccine-specific, and include the mode and timing of vaccinations, particular personal and family circumstances and a rather unspecific notion of side effects. Mumsnet users invite details about others' personal experiences to fill a need left by widely available general vaccine information. The implication is that health services may need to redirect resources from mass population level campaigns to more personalised and tailored approaches for parents who are hesitant about specific vaccines at particular points in time.
“我还是不确定……”——Mumsnet上对疫苗犹豫不决的自发表达
世界上90%的国家的疫苗接种规划受到“疫苗犹豫”的影响。儿童接种疫苗尤其重要。在国际上,这些疫苗接种率一直在下降,导致以前被认为已消灭的传染病重新出现。在这种情况下,我们的论文检查了父母对疫苗优柔寡断的无意识表达——在决策时与接种疫苗有关的困境、犹豫和担忧。我们的语料库辅助语篇研究结合了语篇分析和语料库语言学的定性和定量工具(文本分散关键词和一致性),比较了422篇来自英国育儿网站Mumsnet论坛的原始帖子,这些帖子概述了疫苗犹豫不决与不涉及决策困难的疫苗接种讨论。我们研究了在妈咪网用户的本地化背景下,真正的疫苗优柔寡断的特征。具体来说,我们分析了Mumsnet用户尚未决定的疫苗;哪些担忧具体与优柔寡断有关?以及这些担忧是如何在一个普遍支持接种疫苗的网络空间中提出的。我们的方法结合了分析大型数据集的优势,以及细致入微和局部定性分析的优势。最让父母担心的疫苗是MMR。对其他疫苗的关注随着疾病爆发和新疫苗的引入而波动。与优柔寡断具体有关的担忧主要是个人和疫苗特异性的,包括接种疫苗的方式和时间、特定的个人和家庭情况以及相当不具体的副作用概念。Mumsnet的用户邀请别人详细介绍个人经历,以填补广泛可用的一般疫苗信息留下的需求。这意味着,卫生服务可能需要将资源从大规模人口层面的运动转向更加个性化和量身定制的方法,以帮助那些在特定时间点对特定疫苗犹豫不决的父母。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Corpus Linguistics
Applied Corpus Linguistics Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信