Julia Velten , Hanna Christiansen , Jürgen Hoyer , Tina In-Albon , Tania Lincoln , Wolfgang Lutz , Jürgen Margraf , Henning Schöttke , Rudolf Stark , Katja Werheid , Ulrike Willutzki , Georg W. Alpers , Stephan Bartholdy , Elisa-Maria Berger , Eva-Lotta Brakemeier , Anne-Kathrin Bräscher , Timo Brockmeyer , Isabel Dziobek , Lydia Fehm , Thomas Forkmann , Julian A. Rubel
{"title":"Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for adult mental disorders: A large-scale naturalistic study across 29 university outpatient clinics","authors":"Julia Velten , Hanna Christiansen , Jürgen Hoyer , Tina In-Albon , Tania Lincoln , Wolfgang Lutz , Jürgen Margraf , Henning Schöttke , Rudolf Stark , Katja Werheid , Ulrike Willutzki , Georg W. Alpers , Stephan Bartholdy , Elisa-Maria Berger , Eva-Lotta Brakemeier , Anne-Kathrin Bräscher , Timo Brockmeyer , Isabel Dziobek , Lydia Fehm , Thomas Forkmann , Julian A. Rubel","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Practice-based evidence has emerged as an important complementary paradigm to studies in controlled trials. This paper presents results of a large research-practice network at German university outpatient clinics; the KODAP initiative. Pre-post effect sizes, direct assessments of change, and rates of clinically significant and reliable improvement are reported in a heterogeneous clinical sample of 6624 adult patients treated between 2023 and 2014 in 29 psychotherapeutic outpatient clinics. Clinical diagnoses, determined with structured diagnostic clinical interviews at baseline across all clinics, encompassed a wide range of psychopathology. Effectiveness was comparable to other studies in naturalistic settings (<em>d</em> ≈ 0.75–0.95) and somewhat lower than changes reported in disorder-specific CBT efficacy trials. In direct assessments of change, only 1.9% of the patients reported symptom worsening and 3.4% reported no change during treatment. Overall, the results show the potential of multi-site naturalistic research initiatives in general and the effectiveness of outpatient CBT at German university outpatient clinics in particular.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 104691"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796725000130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Practice-based evidence has emerged as an important complementary paradigm to studies in controlled trials. This paper presents results of a large research-practice network at German university outpatient clinics; the KODAP initiative. Pre-post effect sizes, direct assessments of change, and rates of clinically significant and reliable improvement are reported in a heterogeneous clinical sample of 6624 adult patients treated between 2023 and 2014 in 29 psychotherapeutic outpatient clinics. Clinical diagnoses, determined with structured diagnostic clinical interviews at baseline across all clinics, encompassed a wide range of psychopathology. Effectiveness was comparable to other studies in naturalistic settings (d ≈ 0.75–0.95) and somewhat lower than changes reported in disorder-specific CBT efficacy trials. In direct assessments of change, only 1.9% of the patients reported symptom worsening and 3.4% reported no change during treatment. Overall, the results show the potential of multi-site naturalistic research initiatives in general and the effectiveness of outpatient CBT at German university outpatient clinics in particular.
期刊介绍:
The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.