Characterisation of vent designs in flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheaths

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Richard Menzies-Wilson, Jessica Williams, Candace Rhodes, Alycia Abbott, Thijs Ruiken, Benjamin Turney
{"title":"Characterisation of vent designs in flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheaths","authors":"Richard Menzies-Wilson,&nbsp;Jessica Williams,&nbsp;Candace Rhodes,&nbsp;Alycia Abbott,&nbsp;Thijs Ruiken,&nbsp;Benjamin Turney","doi":"10.1111/bju.16660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the different vent designs in three commercially available flexible and navigable suction (FANS) access sheaths—ClearPetra® (Well lead, Guangzhou, China), Elephant II (YIGAOMedical, Hangzhou, China) and Tuohy-Borst FANS access sheath (Seplou, Zhejiang, China)—and quantify the effects these differing designs have on the control of suction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted benchtop experiments to quantify the effect of pressure vent design on suction pressure control. Suction experiments were conducted both in an atmospheric beaker and in a phantom kidney model. With an indwelling 9.5-F LithoVue™ (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) ureteroscope, constant suction was applied to the access sheath's suction port. The vents were incrementally closed and corresponding flow rates calculated as a proxy for suction pressure. A mathematical model was developed to predict the impact of pressure control vent design on suction pressure control, flow rates and intrarenal pressure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>For both the ClearPetra and Elephant II suction access sheaths, opening the length of the vent has an exponential reduction in suction pressure. Negligible suction is exerted on the renal pelvis with ≥3 mm of vent open. The Seplou suction access sheath has a Tuohy-Borst pressure vent, which allows finer control of suction pressures. The mathematical model showed strong agreement with experimental data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Commercially available FANS access sheaths are similar in most aspects but have differing vent designs. With the vents open no suction is exerted on the renal collecting system. However, because the flexible access sheath intrarenal end is within the renal pelvis, outflow resistance is low and the pelvis will deflate, giving the impression of suction. We have developed a mathematical model that predicts flow at different suction pressures and with different degrees of the pressure vents open. This allows simulations across multidimensional parameter spaces and the resulting quantitative predictions can be exploited to assess the implications of FANS access sheath and ureteroscope design.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"135 5","pages":"835-840"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bju.16660","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.16660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the different vent designs in three commercially available flexible and navigable suction (FANS) access sheaths—ClearPetra® (Well lead, Guangzhou, China), Elephant II (YIGAOMedical, Hangzhou, China) and Tuohy-Borst FANS access sheath (Seplou, Zhejiang, China)—and quantify the effects these differing designs have on the control of suction.

Methods

We conducted benchtop experiments to quantify the effect of pressure vent design on suction pressure control. Suction experiments were conducted both in an atmospheric beaker and in a phantom kidney model. With an indwelling 9.5-F LithoVue™ (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) ureteroscope, constant suction was applied to the access sheath's suction port. The vents were incrementally closed and corresponding flow rates calculated as a proxy for suction pressure. A mathematical model was developed to predict the impact of pressure control vent design on suction pressure control, flow rates and intrarenal pressure.

Results

For both the ClearPetra and Elephant II suction access sheaths, opening the length of the vent has an exponential reduction in suction pressure. Negligible suction is exerted on the renal pelvis with ≥3 mm of vent open. The Seplou suction access sheath has a Tuohy-Borst pressure vent, which allows finer control of suction pressures. The mathematical model showed strong agreement with experimental data.

Conclusion

Commercially available FANS access sheaths are similar in most aspects but have differing vent designs. With the vents open no suction is exerted on the renal collecting system. However, because the flexible access sheath intrarenal end is within the renal pelvis, outflow resistance is low and the pelvis will deflate, giving the impression of suction. We have developed a mathematical model that predicts flow at different suction pressures and with different degrees of the pressure vents open. This allows simulations across multidimensional parameter spaces and the resulting quantitative predictions can be exploited to assess the implications of FANS access sheath and ureteroscope design.

Abstract Image

柔性和可导航的输尿管吸入口鞘通风口设计的特点
目的评估三种市售的柔性和可导航的吸入器(FANS)通道鞘(clearpetra®(Well lead,中国广州)、Elephant II (yigamedical,中国杭州)和Tuohy - Borst FANS通道鞘(中国浙江Seplou)的不同通风口设计,并量化这些不同设计对吸入控制的影响。方法通过台架实验,定量分析压力排气孔设计对吸压控制的影响。在常压烧杯和模拟肾模型中分别进行了吸力实验。采用留置9.5°F LithoVue™(Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA)输尿管镜,持续吸引输尿管鞘的吸引口。喷口逐渐关闭,并计算相应的流量作为吸入压力的代表。建立了一个数学模型来预测压力控制排气口设计对吸入压力控制、流量和肾内压力的影响。结果对于ClearPetra和Elephant II吸入通道护套,打开排气口长度可使吸入压力呈指数级降低。当通气孔打开≥3mm时,对肾盂施加可忽略的吸力。Seplou吸入口护套有一个Tuohy - Borst压力排气口,可以更好地控制吸入压力。数学模型与实验数据吻合较好。结论市售风机检修套在大多数方面相似,但通风口设计不同。当通风口打开时,不会对肾收集系统施加吸力。然而,由于肾内末端的柔性通路鞘在肾盂内,流出阻力低,骨盆会放气,给人以吸引的印象。我们开发了一个数学模型,可以预测不同吸入压力和不同压力程度下的流量。这允许跨多维参数空间进行模拟,由此产生的定量预测可用于评估FANS通路鞘和输尿管镜设计的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信