Adjusted ∆NBR Index Thresholds for Forest Fire Severity Mapping: A Study in Central Amazonia

IF 3.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Camila Julia Pacheco Ramos, Paulo Maurício Lima de Alencastro Graça, Philip Martin Fearnside
{"title":"Adjusted ∆NBR Index Thresholds for Forest Fire Severity Mapping: A Study in Central Amazonia","authors":"Camila Julia Pacheco Ramos, Paulo Maurício Lima de Alencastro Graça, Philip Martin Fearnside","doi":"10.1002/ldr.5466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2006 study of fire severity in coniferous forest by Key and Benson derived threshold values of the Delta Normalized Burn Ratio (∆NBR) for interpreting satellite imagery of fire scars, and ∆NBR has been widely used for forest fire severity worldwide. We hypothesized that these thresholds underestimate the severity of fires of tropical forests. Our goal was to find appropriate thresholds to map fire severities in the central Amazon and evaluate trends in recent years. These forests are increasingly threatened by deforestation, severe droughts and wildfires. We adjusted the ∆NBR decision thresholds using new methods that are relatively fast and cheap, with a combination of field data, hemispherical photographs of the opening of the forest canopy with different fire severities, and the use of Landsat data for fires that occurred in 2015 images. The agreement between the classification of severity in the field and the classification by the adjusted ∆NBR thresholds was satisfactory (overall accuracy = 74.2%; Kappa coefficient = 0.635). Using the Key & Benson thresholds resulted in a Kappa value of only 0.184, and the severity classification would be underestimated. We applied the new threshold values to map forest fire severity in the central Amazon from 1995 to 2017. The year 2015 had the greatest area of fire, of which 60.7% was classified as moderate, 19% as high, and 20% as low severity. The results corroborate the importance of adjusting decision thresholds for each study area to classify fire severity using ∆NBR.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5466","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2006 study of fire severity in coniferous forest by Key and Benson derived threshold values of the Delta Normalized Burn Ratio (∆NBR) for interpreting satellite imagery of fire scars, and ∆NBR has been widely used for forest fire severity worldwide. We hypothesized that these thresholds underestimate the severity of fires of tropical forests. Our goal was to find appropriate thresholds to map fire severities in the central Amazon and evaluate trends in recent years. These forests are increasingly threatened by deforestation, severe droughts and wildfires. We adjusted the ∆NBR decision thresholds using new methods that are relatively fast and cheap, with a combination of field data, hemispherical photographs of the opening of the forest canopy with different fire severities, and the use of Landsat data for fires that occurred in 2015 images. The agreement between the classification of severity in the field and the classification by the adjusted ∆NBR thresholds was satisfactory (overall accuracy = 74.2%; Kappa coefficient = 0.635). Using the Key & Benson thresholds resulted in a Kappa value of only 0.184, and the severity classification would be underestimated. We applied the new threshold values to map forest fire severity in the central Amazon from 1995 to 2017. The year 2015 had the greatest area of fire, of which 60.7% was classified as moderate, 19% as high, and 20% as low severity. The results corroborate the importance of adjusting decision thresholds for each study area to classify fire severity using ∆NBR.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信