Shutang Zhang, Jinjie Du, Peng Wang, Min Lei, Canye Zhong, Yang Ou, Zhen Sun
{"title":"Association between Estimated Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (sdLDL-C) and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk.","authors":"Shutang Zhang, Jinjie Du, Peng Wang, Min Lei, Canye Zhong, Yang Ou, Zhen Sun","doi":"10.36660/abc.20240265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A new formula for estimating small, dense, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDL-C) based on the results of the standard lipid panel is proposed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the association between estimated sdLDL-C (EsdLDL-C) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 12,192 participants from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) database between 2010 and 2020 were included in this cross-sectional study. EsdLDL-C was calculated as EsdLDL-C= LDL-C - [1.43 × LDL-C - (0.14 × (ln (TG) × LDL-C)) - 8.99]. Logistic regression analyses were utilized to assess the association between EsdLDL-C and ASCVD risk. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, and diabetes. An odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used for evaluation. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 12,192 participants, 1,239 (10.16%) had ASCVD. The mean sdLDL-C of participants was estimated to be 42.43±14.75 mg/dL using the formula. Elevated EsdLDL-C levels (OR=1.33; 95%CI, 1.06-1.66) were associated with an increased risk of ASCVD. Subgroup analyses found that there may be an interaction between EsdLDL-C (Pinteraction= 0.001) or non-HDL-C (Pinteraction= 0.015) and hypertension on ASCVD risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated estimated sdLDL-C levels were associated with the risk of ASCVD, and estimated sdLDL-C might be an alternative to sdLDL-C measurement for ASCVD risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"122 1","pages":"e20240265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A new formula for estimating small, dense, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDL-C) based on the results of the standard lipid panel is proposed.
Objectives: To assess the association between estimated sdLDL-C (EsdLDL-C) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk.
Methods: A total of 12,192 participants from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) database between 2010 and 2020 were included in this cross-sectional study. EsdLDL-C was calculated as EsdLDL-C= LDL-C - [1.43 × LDL-C - (0.14 × (ln (TG) × LDL-C)) - 8.99]. Logistic regression analyses were utilized to assess the association between EsdLDL-C and ASCVD risk. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, and diabetes. An odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used for evaluation. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Among 12,192 participants, 1,239 (10.16%) had ASCVD. The mean sdLDL-C of participants was estimated to be 42.43±14.75 mg/dL using the formula. Elevated EsdLDL-C levels (OR=1.33; 95%CI, 1.06-1.66) were associated with an increased risk of ASCVD. Subgroup analyses found that there may be an interaction between EsdLDL-C (Pinteraction= 0.001) or non-HDL-C (Pinteraction= 0.015) and hypertension on ASCVD risk.
Conclusions: Elevated estimated sdLDL-C levels were associated with the risk of ASCVD, and estimated sdLDL-C might be an alternative to sdLDL-C measurement for ASCVD risk assessment.