Persistent macular hole and cystoid macular edema treated with pars plana vitrectomy after failure with topical therapy.

Q3 Medicine
Landon J Rohowetz, Harry W Flynn
{"title":"Persistent macular hole and cystoid macular edema treated with pars plana vitrectomy after failure with topical therapy.","authors":"Landon J Rohowetz, Harry W Flynn","doi":"10.1097/ICB.0000000000001721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report a patient with a persistent macular hole and cystoid macular edema (CME) successfully treated with pars plana vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling after failed topical therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Case report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 70-year-old male presented with a history of decreased vision in the right eye for 3-4 months. Best-corrected visual acuity at the initial examination was 20/80 in the right eye and 20/30 in the left. Optical coherence tomography demonstrated vitreomacular traction with a full-thickness macular hole and prominent CME in the right eye. He was started on topical prednisolone acetate and ketorolac. The width of the hole initially decreased but eventually returned to baseline size despite continued topical therapy. Conservative management with topical therapy was continued in accordance with the patient's preferences. He later underwent phacoemulsification 20 months after presentation without significant improvement in visual acuity. Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling and C3F8 tamponade was ultimately performed 2 years after initial presentation. Postoperatively, the macular hole was closed and visual acuity improved to 20/40 at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Macular holes with significant CME may close with topical therapy alone. In persistent or recalcitrant cases, delayed surgical intervention to close the macular hole can be successful even at 2 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":53580,"journal":{"name":"Retinal Cases and Brief Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retinal Cases and Brief Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICB.0000000000001721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To report a patient with a persistent macular hole and cystoid macular edema (CME) successfully treated with pars plana vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling after failed topical therapy.

Methods: Case report.

Results: A 70-year-old male presented with a history of decreased vision in the right eye for 3-4 months. Best-corrected visual acuity at the initial examination was 20/80 in the right eye and 20/30 in the left. Optical coherence tomography demonstrated vitreomacular traction with a full-thickness macular hole and prominent CME in the right eye. He was started on topical prednisolone acetate and ketorolac. The width of the hole initially decreased but eventually returned to baseline size despite continued topical therapy. Conservative management with topical therapy was continued in accordance with the patient's preferences. He later underwent phacoemulsification 20 months after presentation without significant improvement in visual acuity. Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling and C3F8 tamponade was ultimately performed 2 years after initial presentation. Postoperatively, the macular hole was closed and visual acuity improved to 20/40 at 3 months.

Conclusion: Macular holes with significant CME may close with topical therapy alone. In persistent or recalcitrant cases, delayed surgical intervention to close the macular hole can be successful even at 2 years.

局部治疗失败后,采用玻璃体旁切除术治疗顽固性黄斑孔和囊样黄斑水肿。
目的:报告一例局部治疗失败的黄斑裂孔伴囊状黄斑水肿(CME)患者,经玻璃体切除及内限制膜剥离手术成功治疗。方法:病例报告。结果:男性,70岁,右眼视力下降3-4个月。初次检查最佳矫正视力为右眼20/80,左眼20/30。光学相干断层扫描显示右眼玻璃体黄斑牵拉伴全层黄斑孔和突出的CME。他开始局部使用醋酸强的松龙和酮酸。孔的宽度最初减小,但最终恢复到基线大小,尽管继续局部治疗。根据患者的喜好,继续采用局部治疗的保守治疗。20个月后,他接受了超声乳化术,视力没有明显改善。玻璃体切除伴内限制膜剥离和C3F8填塞最终在初次就诊后2年进行。术后黄斑孔闭合,3个月视力改善至20/40。结论:单纯局部治疗可使明显CME的黄斑孔闭合。在持续或顽固的情况下,延迟手术干预,以关闭黄斑孔可以成功,甚至在2年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Retinal Cases and Brief Reports
Retinal Cases and Brief Reports Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
342
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信