Evaluating the acceptability of a self-directed, self-management intervention for patients and caregivers facing advanced cancer.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Sydney Wasserman, Lydia Ould Brahim, Andrea Maria Laizner, Anita Mehta, José Côté, Melissa Henry, Kimberly Thibodeau, Vasiliki Bessy Bitzas, Sylvie D Lambert
{"title":"Evaluating the acceptability of a self-directed, self-management intervention for patients and caregivers facing advanced cancer.","authors":"Sydney Wasserman, Lydia Ould Brahim, Andrea Maria Laizner, Anita Mehta, José Côté, Melissa Henry, Kimberly Thibodeau, Vasiliki Bessy Bitzas, Sylvie D Lambert","doi":"10.1017/S1478951524001755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Coping-Together is a self-directed, self-management intervention initially developed for patients in early-stages of cancer and their caregivers. This study evaluated its acceptability among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six participants (patients with advanced cancer <i>n</i> = 15 and their caregivers <i>n</i> = 11) were given the Coping-Together materials (6 booklets and a workbook) for 7 weeks. Participants were interviewed twice during this time to solicit feedback on the intervention's content, design, and recommended changes. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants found Coping-Together was mostly relevant. All (<i>n</i> = 26, 100%) participants expressed interest and a desire to improve their self-management skills. Perceived benefits included learning to develop SMARTTER (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, timely, and done together) self-management plans, normalizing challenges, and enhancing communication within the dyad and with their healthcare team. Most (<i>n</i> = 25, 96%) identified strategies from the booklets that benefited them. Top strategies learned were skills to manage physical health (<i>n</i> = 20, 77%) (e.g., monitoring symptoms), emotional well-being (<i>n</i> = 21, 81%) (e.g., reducing stress by reframing thoughts), as well as social well-being (<i>n</i> = 24, 92%) (e.g., communicating with their healthcare team). Barriers included illness severity and time constraints. The unique advanced cancer needs that are to be integrated include support related to fear of death, uncertainty, palliative care and advanced care planning. Suggested modifications involved enhancing accessibility and including more advanced cancer information (e.g., end-of-life planning, comfort care, resources).</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Participants reported several benefits from using Coping-Together, with minimal adaptations needed. Creating SMARTTER self-management plans helped them implement self-management strategies. Specific areas for improvement addressed the need for improved accessibility and more content related to advanced cancer. Findings demonstrate how Coping-Together is acceptable for those living with advanced cancer and their caregivers, offering much of the support needed to enhance day-to-day quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524001755","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Coping-Together is a self-directed, self-management intervention initially developed for patients in early-stages of cancer and their caregivers. This study evaluated its acceptability among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.

Methods: Twenty-six participants (patients with advanced cancer n = 15 and their caregivers n = 11) were given the Coping-Together materials (6 booklets and a workbook) for 7 weeks. Participants were interviewed twice during this time to solicit feedback on the intervention's content, design, and recommended changes. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted.

Results: Participants found Coping-Together was mostly relevant. All (n = 26, 100%) participants expressed interest and a desire to improve their self-management skills. Perceived benefits included learning to develop SMARTTER (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, timely, and done together) self-management plans, normalizing challenges, and enhancing communication within the dyad and with their healthcare team. Most (n = 25, 96%) identified strategies from the booklets that benefited them. Top strategies learned were skills to manage physical health (n = 20, 77%) (e.g., monitoring symptoms), emotional well-being (n = 21, 81%) (e.g., reducing stress by reframing thoughts), as well as social well-being (n = 24, 92%) (e.g., communicating with their healthcare team). Barriers included illness severity and time constraints. The unique advanced cancer needs that are to be integrated include support related to fear of death, uncertainty, palliative care and advanced care planning. Suggested modifications involved enhancing accessibility and including more advanced cancer information (e.g., end-of-life planning, comfort care, resources).

Significance of results: Participants reported several benefits from using Coping-Together, with minimal adaptations needed. Creating SMARTTER self-management plans helped them implement self-management strategies. Specific areas for improvement addressed the need for improved accessibility and more content related to advanced cancer. Findings demonstrate how Coping-Together is acceptable for those living with advanced cancer and their caregivers, offering much of the support needed to enhance day-to-day quality of life.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信