In Vitro Comparison of Color Matching: Universal Shade Composite Resin vs Multi-shade Conventional Composite.

Q3 Dentistry
Walaa F Bisharah, Ahmed S Zahran, Mona T Rajeh, Nada A AbdelAleem
{"title":"<i>In Vitro</i> Comparison of Color Matching: Universal Shade Composite Resin vs Multi-shade Conventional Composite.","authors":"Walaa F Bisharah, Ahmed S Zahran, Mona T Rajeh, Nada A AbdelAleem","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the color matching of OMNICHROMA (OM), a universal shade composite, to the well-established 3M Filtek Z350 composites (FT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An <i>in vitro</i> experimental study was conducted on 80 freshly extracted permanent teeth, with intact buccal surfaces. The teeth were randomly assigned to four groups: Group I OM and groups II, III, and IV (3M Filtek Z350 in shades A3, A3.5, and B2, respectively). Class V cavity preparations were created and restored using the respective composites. Color matching was assessed instrumentally using a spectrophotometer to calculate the color difference (Δ<i>E</i>) values and visually by three trained observers using a standardized visual scoring system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visual assessments showed no significant differences in color matching across the four groups. However, the Δ<i>E</i> color matching analysis revealed significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), with OM exhibiting higher Δ<i>E</i> values compared to FT shades A3.5 and B2. No significant difference was found between OM and shade A3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OMNICHROMA demonstrated excellent visual color matching, comparable to the various shades of FT composites. Despite the higher Δ<i>E</i> values observed instrumentally in comparison to shades A3.5 and B2, OM's ability to blend with different tooth shades visually was highly effective.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>These results suggest that OM offers a versatile and reliable option for achieving satisfactory esthetic outcomes, reducing the need for multiple shade variations in restorative procedures. How to cite this article: Bisharah WF, Zahran AS, Rajeh MT, <i>et al.</i> <i>In Vitro</i> Comparison of Color Matching: Universal Shade Composite Resin vs Multi-shade Conventional Composite. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(11):1039-1044.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"25 11","pages":"1039-1044"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the color matching of OMNICHROMA (OM), a universal shade composite, to the well-established 3M Filtek Z350 composites (FT).

Materials and methods: An in vitro experimental study was conducted on 80 freshly extracted permanent teeth, with intact buccal surfaces. The teeth were randomly assigned to four groups: Group I OM and groups II, III, and IV (3M Filtek Z350 in shades A3, A3.5, and B2, respectively). Class V cavity preparations were created and restored using the respective composites. Color matching was assessed instrumentally using a spectrophotometer to calculate the color difference (ΔE) values and visually by three trained observers using a standardized visual scoring system.

Results: Visual assessments showed no significant differences in color matching across the four groups. However, the ΔE color matching analysis revealed significant differences (p < 0.0001), with OM exhibiting higher ΔE values compared to FT shades A3.5 and B2. No significant difference was found between OM and shade A3.

Conclusion: OMNICHROMA demonstrated excellent visual color matching, comparable to the various shades of FT composites. Despite the higher ΔE values observed instrumentally in comparison to shades A3.5 and B2, OM's ability to blend with different tooth shades visually was highly effective.

Clinical significance: These results suggest that OM offers a versatile and reliable option for achieving satisfactory esthetic outcomes, reducing the need for multiple shade variations in restorative procedures. How to cite this article: Bisharah WF, Zahran AS, Rajeh MT, et al. In Vitro Comparison of Color Matching: Universal Shade Composite Resin vs Multi-shade Conventional Composite. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(11):1039-1044.

体外配色比较:通用色调复合树脂与多色调传统复合树脂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信