Hamstrings and Quadriceps Weaknesses Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Persist Up to 6 Months After Return-to-Sport: An Angle-specific Strength Analysis.

IF 1.6 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.128505
Michiel Hagen, Jos Vanrenterghem, Yves Van den Borne, Maria A Diaz, Sabine Verschueren, Mark A Robinson, Annemie Smeets
{"title":"Hamstrings and Quadriceps Weaknesses Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Persist Up to 6 Months After Return-to-Sport: An Angle-specific Strength Analysis.","authors":"Michiel Hagen, Jos Vanrenterghem, Yves Van den Borne, Maria A Diaz, Sabine Verschueren, Mark A Robinson, Annemie Smeets","doi":"10.26603/001c.128505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hamstrings and quadriceps strength recovery and restoration of the hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio (H/Q ratio) is a major concern after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Recently, moment-angle profiles and angle-specific H/Q ratios are receiving increasing interest.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The first objective of this study was to investigate moment-angle profiles and angle-specific H/Q ratio profiles in athletes with ACLR at the time of RTS. The second objective of this study was to assess whether strength asymmetries identified at the time of RTS, persist after six months.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case-Control study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty athletes who had undergone ACLR performed isokinetic strength tests for concentric knee flexion and extension (60°/s) at RTS, and three and six months later. Twenty controls were tested once. T-tests were used to compare strength differences between 1) ACLR athletes and controls and 2) the injured and uninjured leg of the ACLR athletes. Finally, to assess strength deficits over time, two-way ANOVAs were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Angle-specific analyses and peak moments showed lower hamstrings strength in the injured leg of ACLR athletes compared to their uninjured leg at RTS. Furthermore, angle-specific analyses showed a lower hamstrings strength and H/Q ratio in the injured leg compared to controls at larger knee flexion angles. The latter deficit was not identified with a peak-based analysis. The asymmetries identified at RTS did not change over the six months following RTS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Athletes with ACLR show strength deficits and asymmetries that persist even six months after RTS. As some asymmetries may go undetected by peak-based analyses, angle-specific analyses are recommended.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3b.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 2","pages":"176-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.128505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hamstrings and quadriceps strength recovery and restoration of the hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio (H/Q ratio) is a major concern after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Recently, moment-angle profiles and angle-specific H/Q ratios are receiving increasing interest.

Purpose: The first objective of this study was to investigate moment-angle profiles and angle-specific H/Q ratio profiles in athletes with ACLR at the time of RTS. The second objective of this study was to assess whether strength asymmetries identified at the time of RTS, persist after six months.

Study design: Case-Control study.

Methods: Twenty athletes who had undergone ACLR performed isokinetic strength tests for concentric knee flexion and extension (60°/s) at RTS, and three and six months later. Twenty controls were tested once. T-tests were used to compare strength differences between 1) ACLR athletes and controls and 2) the injured and uninjured leg of the ACLR athletes. Finally, to assess strength deficits over time, two-way ANOVAs were used.

Results: Angle-specific analyses and peak moments showed lower hamstrings strength in the injured leg of ACLR athletes compared to their uninjured leg at RTS. Furthermore, angle-specific analyses showed a lower hamstrings strength and H/Q ratio in the injured leg compared to controls at larger knee flexion angles. The latter deficit was not identified with a peak-based analysis. The asymmetries identified at RTS did not change over the six months following RTS.

Conclusions: Athletes with ACLR show strength deficits and asymmetries that persist even six months after RTS. As some asymmetries may go undetected by peak-based analyses, angle-specific analyses are recommended.

Level of evidence: Level 3b.

前交叉韧带重建后腘绳肌和股四头肌的弱点在恢复运动后持续长达6个月:一个角度特定的力量分析。
背景:前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后腘绳肌和股四头肌力量恢复和腘绳肌与股四头肌比值(H/Q ratio)的恢复是一个主要关注的问题。最近,矩角剖面和角度相关的H/Q比正受到越来越多的关注。目的:本研究的第一个目的是研究RTS时ACLR运动员的力矩-角度特征和角度特异性H/Q比特征。本研究的第二个目的是评估在RTS时确定的力量不对称是否在6个月后持续存在。研究设计:病例对照研究。方法:20名接受ACLR的运动员在RTS和3个月和6个月后分别进行了同心圆膝关节屈伸(60°/s)的等速力量测试。对20个对照组进行了一次测试。采用t检验比较1)ACLR运动员和对照组的力量差异,2)ACLR运动员受伤和未受伤的腿之间的力量差异。最后,为了评估随时间推移的力量缺陷,采用了双向方差分析。结果:角度特异性分析和峰值力矩显示,与RTS中未受伤的腿相比,ACLR运动员受伤腿的下腘绳肌力量。此外,角度特异性分析显示,与大膝关节屈曲角度的对照组相比,受伤腿的腘绳肌强度和H/Q比更低。后一种赤字没有通过基于峰值的分析确定。在RTS之后的6个月里,我们发现的不对称性并没有改变。结论:ACLR运动员表现出力量缺陷和不对称,甚至在RTS后6个月仍持续存在。由于某些不对称可能无法通过基于峰的分析检测到,因此建议使用特定角度的分析。证据等级:3b级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信