[Neuroimaging predictors of favorable outcomes after shunting procedures in patients with Hakim-Adams syndrome: a pilot prospective randomized trial].

Q4 Medicine
A V Stanishevskiy, G V Gavrilov, B G Adleyba, M N Radkov, D V Svistov, I D Sukhinov
{"title":"[Neuroimaging predictors of favorable outcomes after shunting procedures in patients with Hakim-Adams syndrome: a pilot prospective randomized trial].","authors":"A V Stanishevskiy, G V Gavrilov, B G Adleyba, M N Radkov, D V Svistov, I D Sukhinov","doi":"10.17116/neiro20258901168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Higher effectiveness of cerebrospinal fluid shunting procedures is still an unresolved issue in the treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Thus, over 15% of patients do not experience symptom regression in postoperative period. In recent years, several MRI predictors have been actively investigated to forecast the outcomes of cerebrospinal fluid shunting procedures. We have previously introduced a prognostic model for comprehensive evaluation of MRI data facilitating identification of patients likely to benefit from surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate diagnostic properties of MRI data comprehensive assessment model compared to traditional invasive diagnostic method (spinal tap test) in prospective randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>MRI data and postoperative outcomes in patients diagnosed with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunting between September 2022 and April 2024 were analyzed in prospective randomized study. In the study group, surgical decisions were based on MRI data, while the control group followed an algorithm incorporating invasive diagnostic method (spinal tap-test). Ventriculoperitoneal shunting with constant-pressure valve implantation was performed in all patients selected for surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 54 patients (25 ones in the study group and 29 ones in the control group). Surgery was performed in 21 and 20 patients, respectively. We found no advantages of invasive diagnostic methods over comprehensive assessment of MRI data in predicting the effectiveness of surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comprehensive assessment of MRI findings allows for avoiding invasive diagnostic procedures in decision-making on cerebrospinal fluid shunting surgery in some patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.</p>","PeriodicalId":24032,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","volume":"89 1","pages":"68-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20258901168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Higher effectiveness of cerebrospinal fluid shunting procedures is still an unresolved issue in the treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Thus, over 15% of patients do not experience symptom regression in postoperative period. In recent years, several MRI predictors have been actively investigated to forecast the outcomes of cerebrospinal fluid shunting procedures. We have previously introduced a prognostic model for comprehensive evaluation of MRI data facilitating identification of patients likely to benefit from surgical intervention.

Objective: To evaluate diagnostic properties of MRI data comprehensive assessment model compared to traditional invasive diagnostic method (spinal tap test) in prospective randomized trial.

Material and methods: MRI data and postoperative outcomes in patients diagnosed with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunting between September 2022 and April 2024 were analyzed in prospective randomized study. In the study group, surgical decisions were based on MRI data, while the control group followed an algorithm incorporating invasive diagnostic method (spinal tap-test). Ventriculoperitoneal shunting with constant-pressure valve implantation was performed in all patients selected for surgery.

Results: The study included 54 patients (25 ones in the study group and 29 ones in the control group). Surgery was performed in 21 and 20 patients, respectively. We found no advantages of invasive diagnostic methods over comprehensive assessment of MRI data in predicting the effectiveness of surgical treatment.

Conclusion: Comprehensive assessment of MRI findings allows for avoiding invasive diagnostic procedures in decision-making on cerebrospinal fluid shunting surgery in some patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

[哈基姆-亚当斯综合征患者分流手术后有利结果的神经影像学预测:一项前瞻性随机试验]。
在特发性常压脑积水的治疗中,脑脊液分流术的更高有效性仍然是一个未解决的问题。因此,超过15%的患者在术后没有出现症状消退。近年来,一些MRI预测指标已被积极研究,以预测脑脊液分流手术的结果。我们之前已经介绍了一种预后模型,用于对MRI数据进行综合评估,以方便识别可能从手术干预中受益的患者。目的:在前瞻性随机试验中比较MRI资料综合评价模型与传统侵入性诊断方法(脊髓穿刺试验)的诊断性能。材料与方法:前瞻性随机研究分析了2022年9月至2024年4月期间诊断为特发性常压脑积水并行脑室-腹膜分流术的患者的MRI数据和术后结果。在研究组中,手术决定基于MRI数据,而对照组则采用结合侵入性诊断方法(脊柱轻叩试验)的算法。所有选择手术的患者均行恒压瓣膜植入的脑室-腹膜分流术。结果:共纳入54例患者,其中研究组25例,对照组29例。分别对21例和20例患者进行了手术。我们发现,在预测手术治疗的有效性方面,侵入性诊断方法与综合评估MRI数据相比没有优势。结论:对一些特发性常压脑积水患者的MRI表现进行综合评估,可以避免侵入性的诊断程序来决定是否进行脑脊液分流手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Scientific and practical peer-reviewed journal. This publication covers the theoretical, practical and organizational problems of modern neurosurgery, the latest advances in the treatment of various diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system. Founded in 1937. English version of the journal translates from Russian version since #1/2013.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信