[Continuous monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials following spinothalamic tract stimulation in brainstem and spinal cord surgery: case report and literature review].

Q4 Medicine
K N Lapteva, A V Gavryushin
{"title":"[Continuous monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials following spinothalamic tract stimulation in brainstem and spinal cord surgery: case report and literature review].","authors":"K N Lapteva, A V Gavryushin","doi":"10.17116/neiro20258901194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary objective of neurosurgical intervention for central nervous system tumors is a balance between optimal tumor resection and minimal postoperative neurological impairment. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is essential in safeguarding somatosensory tracts during surgery. Virtually the only tool for continuous monitoring of sensory pathways is registration of peripheral somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs). However, this method has some limitations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To increase the quality of intraoperative SSEP monitoring in surgical treatment of brainstem and spinal cord tumors.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>To ensure continuous monitoring of sensory pathway function in brainstem and spinal cord surgery, we modified the method for monitoring of SSEPs. Unlike standard technique, we placed two-contact electrode for stimulation either in the area of the bottom of the fourth ventricle or on posterior surface of the spinal cord along the midline. This allows us to stimulate pontine tegmentum or posterior columns of spinal cord.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrated the feasibility of this method in 2 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The advantage of this method is possible brainstem or spinal cord stimulation reducing the chain of somatosensory tract that is valuable to neutralize the effect of anesthesia on significance of neurophysiological data.</p>","PeriodicalId":24032,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","volume":"89 1","pages":"94-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20258901194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The primary objective of neurosurgical intervention for central nervous system tumors is a balance between optimal tumor resection and minimal postoperative neurological impairment. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is essential in safeguarding somatosensory tracts during surgery. Virtually the only tool for continuous monitoring of sensory pathways is registration of peripheral somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs). However, this method has some limitations.

Objective: To increase the quality of intraoperative SSEP monitoring in surgical treatment of brainstem and spinal cord tumors.

Material and methods: To ensure continuous monitoring of sensory pathway function in brainstem and spinal cord surgery, we modified the method for monitoring of SSEPs. Unlike standard technique, we placed two-contact electrode for stimulation either in the area of the bottom of the fourth ventricle or on posterior surface of the spinal cord along the midline. This allows us to stimulate pontine tegmentum or posterior columns of spinal cord.

Results: We demonstrated the feasibility of this method in 2 cases.

Conclusion: The advantage of this method is possible brainstem or spinal cord stimulation reducing the chain of somatosensory tract that is valuable to neutralize the effect of anesthesia on significance of neurophysiological data.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Scientific and practical peer-reviewed journal. This publication covers the theoretical, practical and organizational problems of modern neurosurgery, the latest advances in the treatment of various diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system. Founded in 1937. English version of the journal translates from Russian version since #1/2013.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信