Clinical effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab plus TKI as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): a single-center retrospective study.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Xi Zhong, Tingxuan Huang, Yulu Peng, Wensu Wei, Zhiling Zhang, Hui Han, Pei Dong
{"title":"Clinical effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab plus TKI as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): a single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Xi Zhong, Tingxuan Huang, Yulu Peng, Wensu Wei, Zhiling Zhang, Hui Han, Pei Dong","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05443-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The therapeutic efficacy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been significantly enhanced with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, there are limited data on the efficacy of Tislelizumab in patients with mRCC. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of Tislelizumab plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for patients with mRCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic and clinicopathological data of mRCC patients treated with first-line TKI monotherapy or Tislelizumab plus TKI therapy between March 2019 to February 2023 were collected. Outcome measures included the objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS). Patient baseline characteristics and adverse events (AEs) were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 136 patients were included in the analysis, with a median age of 57 years. Of the patients, 72.1% were male, 78.8% with intermediate/poor-risk disease. For the overall population, the combination group (n = 61) exhibited a longer PFS compared to the TKI monotherapy group (n = 75) (mPFS (95% CI): 15.9 (10.9-20.9) vs. 6.2 (5.4-6.9) months, P < 0.001) and improved ORR (44.3% vs. 18.7%, P = 0.001). In the non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC) subgroup (n = 39), the combination group (n = 20) showed improved PFS (mPFS (95% CI): 11.9 (0.6-23.3) vs. 4.6 (3.4-5.9) months, P < 0.001) and ORR (40.0% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.006) compared to the TKI monotherapy group (n = 19). The incidence of grade three or higher treatment-related AEs are comparable between the groups (47.54% vs. 40.00%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data demonstrated the promising efficacy and safety profile of Tislelizumab plus TKI as first-line treatment for both ccRCC and nccRCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05443-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The therapeutic efficacy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been significantly enhanced with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, there are limited data on the efficacy of Tislelizumab in patients with mRCC. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of Tislelizumab plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for patients with mRCC.

Methods: Demographic and clinicopathological data of mRCC patients treated with first-line TKI monotherapy or Tislelizumab plus TKI therapy between March 2019 to February 2023 were collected. Outcome measures included the objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS). Patient baseline characteristics and adverse events (AEs) were documented.

Results: Totally 136 patients were included in the analysis, with a median age of 57 years. Of the patients, 72.1% were male, 78.8% with intermediate/poor-risk disease. For the overall population, the combination group (n = 61) exhibited a longer PFS compared to the TKI monotherapy group (n = 75) (mPFS (95% CI): 15.9 (10.9-20.9) vs. 6.2 (5.4-6.9) months, P < 0.001) and improved ORR (44.3% vs. 18.7%, P = 0.001). In the non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC) subgroup (n = 39), the combination group (n = 20) showed improved PFS (mPFS (95% CI): 11.9 (0.6-23.3) vs. 4.6 (3.4-5.9) months, P < 0.001) and ORR (40.0% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.006) compared to the TKI monotherapy group (n = 19). The incidence of grade three or higher treatment-related AEs are comparable between the groups (47.54% vs. 40.00%).

Conclusion: Our data demonstrated the promising efficacy and safety profile of Tislelizumab plus TKI as first-line treatment for both ccRCC and nccRCC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信