Injury Prevention Strategies in Dance: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Meghan L Critchley, Ebonie Rio, Kenzie B Friesen, Anu M Räisänen, Sarah J Kenny, Carolyn A Emery
{"title":"Injury Prevention Strategies in Dance: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Meghan L Critchley, Ebonie Rio, Kenzie B Friesen, Anu M Räisänen, Sarah J Kenny, Carolyn A Emery","doi":"10.1177/1089313X251314987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Dance is a popular activity worldwide that comes with inherently high injury rates. Despite the call for implementation and evaluation of injury prevention strategies, the utility and efficacy of injury prevention practices in dance are unknown. <b>Objective:</b> The primary objective of this systematic review was to describe dance-specific injury prevention strategies in any dance population. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies in the reduction of injury prevalence or incidence rates. <b>Methods:</b> Six electronic databases were searched to March 2024 (Medline, EMBASE, SportDiscus, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Cochrane). Selected studies met a priori inclusion criteria that required original data describing an injury prevention strategy for any genre of dance. Studies were excluded if; no injury outcomes were reported, no injury prevention strategy was utilized, or if dance was used as a therapeutic intervention/fitness. Two reviewers independently assessed abstracts and full texts for inclusion. Study quality was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Level of Evidence tool. <b>Results:</b> From 2209 potentially relevant records, 8 studies met criteria for inclusion. Injury prevention strategies were diverse across conditioning and exercise programs, neuromuscular training warm-up, psychological coping skills training, and educational programs, with a range of duration and adherence measures. Due to inconsistent injury surveillance methodology, efficacy of these programs could not be determined. Quality of included studies was moderate to high, with moderate to low risk of bias. <b>Conclusions:</b> Efficacy and adherence to dance-specific injury prevention strategies are understudied in the dance science literature. Conditioning and exercise programs are currently the most common injury prevention strategies, with initial evidence suggesting they may be efficacious in reducing injury rates. Further research using valid injury surveillance methodologies and standardized injury definitions to examine the efficacy of these strategies in reducing dance-related injury is needed. <b>Level of evidence:</b> I.</p>","PeriodicalId":46421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","volume":" ","pages":"1089313X251314987"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313X251314987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dance is a popular activity worldwide that comes with inherently high injury rates. Despite the call for implementation and evaluation of injury prevention strategies, the utility and efficacy of injury prevention practices in dance are unknown. Objective: The primary objective of this systematic review was to describe dance-specific injury prevention strategies in any dance population. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies in the reduction of injury prevalence or incidence rates. Methods: Six electronic databases were searched to March 2024 (Medline, EMBASE, SportDiscus, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Cochrane). Selected studies met a priori inclusion criteria that required original data describing an injury prevention strategy for any genre of dance. Studies were excluded if; no injury outcomes were reported, no injury prevention strategy was utilized, or if dance was used as a therapeutic intervention/fitness. Two reviewers independently assessed abstracts and full texts for inclusion. Study quality was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Level of Evidence tool. Results: From 2209 potentially relevant records, 8 studies met criteria for inclusion. Injury prevention strategies were diverse across conditioning and exercise programs, neuromuscular training warm-up, psychological coping skills training, and educational programs, with a range of duration and adherence measures. Due to inconsistent injury surveillance methodology, efficacy of these programs could not be determined. Quality of included studies was moderate to high, with moderate to low risk of bias. Conclusions: Efficacy and adherence to dance-specific injury prevention strategies are understudied in the dance science literature. Conditioning and exercise programs are currently the most common injury prevention strategies, with initial evidence suggesting they may be efficacious in reducing injury rates. Further research using valid injury surveillance methodologies and standardized injury definitions to examine the efficacy of these strategies in reducing dance-related injury is needed. Level of evidence: I.

舞蹈伤害预防策略:系统回顾。
背景:舞蹈是一项世界范围内流行的运动,它本身就具有很高的受伤率。尽管呼吁实施和评估伤害预防策略,在舞蹈伤害预防实践的效用和功效是未知的。目的:本系统综述的主要目的是描述任何舞蹈人群中舞蹈特异性伤害预防策略。次要目的是评估这些策略在降低损伤流行率或发生率方面的有效性。方法:检索至2024年3月的6个电子数据库(Medline、EMBASE、SportDiscus、CINAHL、SCOPUS、Cochrane)。所选的研究符合先验的纳入标准,需要原始数据描述任何类型的舞蹈的伤害预防策略。研究被排除,如果;没有损伤结果的报道,没有使用损伤预防策略,或者如果舞蹈被用作治疗干预/健身。两位审稿人独立评估摘要和全文是否纳入。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所证据水平工具评估研究质量。结果:在2209份可能相关的记录中,有8项研究符合纳入标准。伤害预防策略在调节和锻炼计划、神经肌肉训练热身、心理应对技能训练和教育计划中是多种多样的,并有一系列的持续时间和坚持措施。由于不一致的损伤监测方法,这些方案的有效性不能确定。纳入研究的质量为中至高,偏倚风险为中至低。结论:舞蹈科学文献对舞蹈特定伤害预防策略的疗效和依从性研究不足。调节和锻炼计划是目前最常见的伤害预防策略,初步证据表明它们可能有效地降低受伤率。需要进一步研究使用有效的损伤监测方法和标准化的损伤定义来检查这些策略在减少舞蹈相关损伤方面的功效。证据等级:1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信