Benefits of movement-based Behaviors on improving erectile function in American men: a nationwide survey study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sexual Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-03 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/sexmed/qfaf003
Yiming Chen, Qianfeng Zhuang, Wei Xia, Naiyuan Shao, Bo Zhang, Xingliang Feng
{"title":"Benefits of movement-based Behaviors on improving erectile function in American men: a nationwide survey study.","authors":"Yiming Chen, Qianfeng Zhuang, Wei Xia, Naiyuan Shao, Bo Zhang, Xingliang Feng","doi":"10.1093/sexmed/qfaf003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent condition with significant psychological and physiological impacts. Recently, a new concept called movement-based behaviors (MBB) has been proposed, which includes four types of PA: vigorous PA (VPA), moderate-intensity PA (MPA), walking/cycling, and muscle-strengthening activities (MSA), and uses an MBB index (range 0-4) to estimate the combined effects of these activities on health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the relationship between different types of physical activities (PA) and ED using the MBB index in a nationally representative sample of U.S. men.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001-2004, including 3435 male participants. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to explore the associations, supplemented with subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The assessment of PA in this study is based on four self-reported questions from the NHANES Mobile Examination Center interview, including VPA, MPA, walking/cycling, and MSA. The MBB index, ranging from 0 to 4, was used to assess combined PA types. ED was evaluated using a single-question self-assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher MBB index values were associated with lower ED risk. Participants with an MBB index of 2 had a significantly lower risk of ED in Model 3 (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.43-0.97, P = 0.04). Those with an MBB index of 3 or 4 had the lowest risk of ED across all models, with OR_Model1 = 0.29 (95% CI: 0.21-0.40, P < 0.0001), OR_Model2 = 0.52 (95% CI: 0.37-0.73, P < 0.001), and OR_Model3 = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.41-0.90, P = 0.02). However, this relationship was not significant in subgroups with severe ED or comorbid conditions.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Our findings can provide clinicians with guidance to help patients personalize their selection of different exercise combinations.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>We explored the impact of different exercise combinations on reducing ED risk and innovatively proposed the MBB index for a comprehensive assessment of exercise benefits, supported by a large sample size and multivariable adjustments. However, the limitations of cross-sectional design and recall bias cannot be overlooked.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MBB index effectively demonstrates that combined PA can reduce ED risk, supporting tailored exercise recommendations for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21782,"journal":{"name":"Sexual Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"qfaf003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfaf003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent condition with significant psychological and physiological impacts. Recently, a new concept called movement-based behaviors (MBB) has been proposed, which includes four types of PA: vigorous PA (VPA), moderate-intensity PA (MPA), walking/cycling, and muscle-strengthening activities (MSA), and uses an MBB index (range 0-4) to estimate the combined effects of these activities on health outcomes.

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the relationship between different types of physical activities (PA) and ED using the MBB index in a nationally representative sample of U.S. men.

Methods: We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001-2004, including 3435 male participants. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to explore the associations, supplemented with subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis.

Outcomes: The assessment of PA in this study is based on four self-reported questions from the NHANES Mobile Examination Center interview, including VPA, MPA, walking/cycling, and MSA. The MBB index, ranging from 0 to 4, was used to assess combined PA types. ED was evaluated using a single-question self-assessment.

Results: Higher MBB index values were associated with lower ED risk. Participants with an MBB index of 2 had a significantly lower risk of ED in Model 3 (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.43-0.97, P = 0.04). Those with an MBB index of 3 or 4 had the lowest risk of ED across all models, with OR_Model1 = 0.29 (95% CI: 0.21-0.40, P < 0.0001), OR_Model2 = 0.52 (95% CI: 0.37-0.73, P < 0.001), and OR_Model3 = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.41-0.90, P = 0.02). However, this relationship was not significant in subgroups with severe ED or comorbid conditions.

Clinical implications: Our findings can provide clinicians with guidance to help patients personalize their selection of different exercise combinations.

Strengths and limitations: We explored the impact of different exercise combinations on reducing ED risk and innovatively proposed the MBB index for a comprehensive assessment of exercise benefits, supported by a large sample size and multivariable adjustments. However, the limitations of cross-sectional design and recall bias cannot be overlooked.

Conclusion: The MBB index effectively demonstrates that combined PA can reduce ED risk, supporting tailored exercise recommendations for patients.

以运动为基础的行为对改善美国男性勃起功能的益处:一项全国性调查研究。
背景:勃起功能障碍(ED)是一种普遍的疾病,具有显著的心理和生理影响。最近,一种新的概念被提出,称为运动行为(MBB),其中包括四种类型的运动行为:剧烈运动(VPA),中等强度运动(MPA),步行/骑自行车和肌肉强化活动(MSA),并使用MBB指数(范围0-4)来评估这些活动对健康结果的综合影响。目的:本研究旨在评估不同类型的体育活动(PA)和ED之间的关系,使用具有全国代表性的美国男性样本的MBB指数。方法:我们分析了2001-2004年美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)的数据,包括3435名男性参与者。采用多因素logistic回归探讨相关性,并辅以亚组分析和敏感性分析。结果:本研究中PA的评估基于来自NHANES移动检查中心访谈的四个自我报告问题,包括VPA、MPA、步行/骑自行车和MSA。MBB指数范围为0 ~ 4,用于评价组合PA类型。ED采用单题自我评估进行评估。结果:MBB指数值越高,ED风险越低。MBB指数为2的参与者在模型3中发生ED的风险显著降低(OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.43-0.97, P = 0.04)。在所有模型中,MBB指数为3或4的患者发生ED的风险最低,OR_Model1 = 0.29 (95% CI: 0.21-0.40, P)。临床意义:我们的研究结果可以为临床医生提供指导,帮助患者个性化选择不同的运动组合。优势和局限性:我们探索了不同运动组合对降低ED风险的影响,并创新性地提出了MBB指数,以大样本量和多变量调整为支持,用于综合评估运动益处。然而,横截面设计和回忆偏差的局限性不容忽视。结论:MBB指数有效地表明联合PA可以降低ED风险,为患者提供量身定制的运动建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual Medicine
Sexual Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual Medicine is an official publication of the International Society for Sexual Medicine, and serves the field as the peer-reviewed, open access journal for rapid dissemination of multidisciplinary clinical and basic research in all areas of global sexual medicine, and particularly acts as a venue for topics of regional or sub-specialty interest. The journal is focused on issues in clinical medicine and epidemiology but also publishes basic science papers with particular relevance to specific populations. Sexual Medicine offers clinicians and researchers a rapid route to publication and the opportunity to publish in a broadly distributed and highly visible global forum. The journal publishes high quality articles from all over the world and actively seeks submissions from countries with expanding sexual medicine communities. Sexual Medicine relies on the same expert panel of editors and reviewers as The Journal of Sexual Medicine and Sexual Medicine Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信