Effect of beta-agonist type and timing of Experior feeding on calculated cumulative ammonia gas emissions, live growth performance, and carcass outcomes, and objective tenderness outcomes of feedlot steers.

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2025-01-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txaf009
Wilsey M Wendler, Michael S Davis, Walter C Koers, Phillip J Rincker, Nathan A Pyatt, Loni W Lucherk, Ty E Lawrence
{"title":"Effect of beta-agonist type and timing of Experior feeding on calculated cumulative ammonia gas emissions, live growth performance, and carcass outcomes, and objective tenderness outcomes of feedlot steers.","authors":"Wilsey M Wendler, Michael S Davis, Walter C Koers, Phillip J Rincker, Nathan A Pyatt, Loni W Lucherk, Ty E Lawrence","doi":"10.1093/tas/txaf009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our objective was to compare beta-agonist feeding strategies and evaluate Experior (EXP) with added days on feed (DOF) for live growth performance and carcass outcomes. Steers (n = 2,517; initial BW = 336 ± 23 kg) were allocated to 36 pens in a randomized, complete-block design and assigned to 1 of 6 treatments. Treatments were negative control (no beta-ligand; CON), Optaflexx (ractopamine hydrochloride, 300 mg·head<sup>-1</sup>·day<sup>-1</sup> for 35 d; OPT), and Experior (lubabegron fumarate, 36 mg·head<sup>-1</sup>·day<sup>-1</sup> for 56 d + 4 d removal; 0EXP) with all three treatments fed for 198 d. Remaining treatments were fed EXP for same duration as 0EXP, but total DOF were adjusted by -14 d (-14EXP), +14 d (+14EXP) and +28 d (+28EXP). Statistical analyses were conducted using mixed models; treatment was the fixed effect, block was a random effect, means were separated with the Tukey-Kramer adjustment, and contrasts were calculated to test linear or quadratic effects of EXP across DOF. No treatment differences (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.72) were observed for daily dry matter intake. Calculated cumulative ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) gas emissions (CCAGE) expressed either as total NH<sub>3</sub> emitted (g) or NH<sub>3</sub> emitted per kg of BW or HCW was reduced (<i>P</i> < 0.01) by 5.6-8.5%, 5.1-10.7%, and 6.3-13.6%, respectively for 0EXP, +14EXP and +28EXP compared to CON. Carcass ADG of 0EXP steers was 6.8% greater (<i>P</i> < 0.01) than CON, which had similar (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.10) ADG to OPT, +14EXP, and +28EXP steers. Carcass G:F of 0EXP steers was improved 5.0% compared to CON (<i>P</i> = 0.01) and was not different (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.10) from OPT, -14EXP or +14EXP steers. Hot carcass weight of 0EXP, +14EXP, or +28EXP steers was 14-37 kg heavier (<i>P</i> < 0.01) than CON, which did not differ (<i>P</i> = 0.81) from OPT. Steers fed EXP had 1.15-2.5% point increase (<i>P</i> < 0.01) in dressed yields. <i>Longissimus</i> muscle area was 4.03-6.23 cm<sup>2</sup> larger (<i>P</i> < 0.01) in steers fed EXP compared to CON, which tended to differ (<i>P</i> = 0.08) from OPT. Marbling score was 31-39 points lower (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.02) for -14EXP compared to CON and OPT, whereas 0EXP tended (<i>P</i> = 0.09) to differ from CON and +14EXP and +28EXP were similar (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.28) to CON and OPT. Slice shear force values were 20.1% greater (<i>P</i> < 0.02) for +14EXP compared to CON, whereas 0EXP tended (<i>P</i> = 0.09) to be greater and +28EXP, -14EXP and OPT were similar (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.28) to CON. This study illustrates EXP decreased CCAGE and increased HCW with minimal quality changes when fed the last 56 d on feed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"9 ","pages":"txaf009"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our objective was to compare beta-agonist feeding strategies and evaluate Experior (EXP) with added days on feed (DOF) for live growth performance and carcass outcomes. Steers (n = 2,517; initial BW = 336 ± 23 kg) were allocated to 36 pens in a randomized, complete-block design and assigned to 1 of 6 treatments. Treatments were negative control (no beta-ligand; CON), Optaflexx (ractopamine hydrochloride, 300 mg·head-1·day-1 for 35 d; OPT), and Experior (lubabegron fumarate, 36 mg·head-1·day-1 for 56 d + 4 d removal; 0EXP) with all three treatments fed for 198 d. Remaining treatments were fed EXP for same duration as 0EXP, but total DOF were adjusted by -14 d (-14EXP), +14 d (+14EXP) and +28 d (+28EXP). Statistical analyses were conducted using mixed models; treatment was the fixed effect, block was a random effect, means were separated with the Tukey-Kramer adjustment, and contrasts were calculated to test linear or quadratic effects of EXP across DOF. No treatment differences (P ≥ 0.72) were observed for daily dry matter intake. Calculated cumulative ammonia (NH3) gas emissions (CCAGE) expressed either as total NH3 emitted (g) or NH3 emitted per kg of BW or HCW was reduced (P < 0.01) by 5.6-8.5%, 5.1-10.7%, and 6.3-13.6%, respectively for 0EXP, +14EXP and +28EXP compared to CON. Carcass ADG of 0EXP steers was 6.8% greater (P < 0.01) than CON, which had similar (P ≥ 0.10) ADG to OPT, +14EXP, and +28EXP steers. Carcass G:F of 0EXP steers was improved 5.0% compared to CON (P = 0.01) and was not different (P ≥ 0.10) from OPT, -14EXP or +14EXP steers. Hot carcass weight of 0EXP, +14EXP, or +28EXP steers was 14-37 kg heavier (P < 0.01) than CON, which did not differ (P = 0.81) from OPT. Steers fed EXP had 1.15-2.5% point increase (P < 0.01) in dressed yields. Longissimus muscle area was 4.03-6.23 cm2 larger (P < 0.01) in steers fed EXP compared to CON, which tended to differ (P = 0.08) from OPT. Marbling score was 31-39 points lower (P ≤ 0.02) for -14EXP compared to CON and OPT, whereas 0EXP tended (P = 0.09) to differ from CON and +14EXP and +28EXP were similar (P ≥ 0.28) to CON and OPT. Slice shear force values were 20.1% greater (P < 0.02) for +14EXP compared to CON, whereas 0EXP tended (P = 0.09) to be greater and +28EXP, -14EXP and OPT were similar (P ≥ 0.28) to CON. This study illustrates EXP decreased CCAGE and increased HCW with minimal quality changes when fed the last 56 d on feed.

受体激动剂类型和饲喂时间对饲养场阉牛计算累积氨气排放量、活产性能、胴体结局和客观嫩度结局的影响
我们的目的是比较-激动剂饲喂策略,并评估Experior (EXP)与饲料日增重(DOF)对活生长性能和胴体结局的影响。舵手(n = 2517;初始体重= 336±23 kg),按随机、完全区组设计,分配到36个栏中,分为6个处理中的1个。阴性对照(无-配体;CON), Optaflexx(盐酸莱克多巴胺,300 mg·head-1·day-1, 35 d;和Experior(富马酸润滑油,36 mg·头-1·天-1,56 d + 4 d去除;其余处理饲喂EXP的持续时间与0EXP相同,但总自由度分别调整为-14 d (-14EXP)、+14 d (+14EXP)和+28 d (+28EXP)。采用混合模型进行统计分析;处理为固定效应,块为随机效应,均值用Tukey-Kramer调整分离,并计算对比以检验EXP在DOF上的线性或二次效应。日干物质采食量无处理差异(P≥0.72)。计算的累积氨(NH3)气体排放量(CCAGE)以总NH3排放量(g)或每千克体重或HCW排放的NH3表示(P P P≥0.10),每g减少到OPT, +14EXP和+28EXP。0EXP组胴体G:F较CON组提高5.0% (P = 0.01),与OPT组、-14EXP组和+14EXP组相比差异不显著(P≥0.10)。热胴体重量的0 EXP + 14经验,或+ 28 EXP引导14-37公斤重的选择(P P = 0.81)。引导美联储EXP 1.15点增加-2.5% (P Longissimus肌肉面积是4.03 - -6.23厘米2从选择较大(P P = 0.08)。大理石花纹是31 - 39分低(P≤0.02)-14年实验相比,欺诈和选择,而0 EXP倾向(P = 0.09)不同于欺诈和+ 14 EXP + 28 EXP相似(P≥0.28)欺诈和选择。片剪切力值大20.1% (P P = 0.09), + 28大实验,-14EXP和OPT与con相似(P≥0.28)。本研究表明,在饲喂饲料的最后56 d时,EXP降低了CCAGE,增加了HCW,但质量变化最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信