Women's reproductive autonomy during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1518-8345.6910.4437
Carolyne Souza de Moura Barbosa, Ana Cecília Silvestre da Silva, Géssyca Cavalcante de Melo, Alba Maria Bomfim de França
{"title":"Women's reproductive autonomy during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Carolyne Souza de Moura Barbosa, Ana Cecília Silvestre da Silva, Géssyca Cavalcante de Melo, Alba Maria Bomfim de França","doi":"10.1590/1518-8345.6910.4437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to analyze the reproductive autonomy of women during the COVID-19 pandemic, considering sociodemographic, clinical, and reproductive factors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>a quantitative study with a cross-sectional design, conducted with 314 women aged 18 to 49 years old. Data were collected through an online questionnaire containing sociodemographic, clinical, and reproductive data, as well as the Reproductive Autonomy Scale. The Mann-Whitney and Student's t tests were used to compare variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>significant differences were found between the average scores of \"decision-making\" and marital status (p = <0.001); and \"absence of coercion\" and \"communication\" with age group (p = 0.03 e <0.001), residence (p = <0.001 and <0.01), schooling level (p = 0.02 e 0.02), pregnancy (p = <0.001 e 0.04) and contraception (p = 0.02 e <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>not having a sexual partner positively influenced autonomy in reproductive decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic. Women of younger age, living in the capital, with higher education levels, who had never been pregnant, and who used contraceptives during the pandemic showed greater autonomy in the absence of coercion and communication. It was possible to identify the groups that require greater attention and interventions to support their sexual health and reproductive choices.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>(1) A high reproductive autonomy score was observed even during the pandemic. (2) Not having a stable partner positively influenced reproductive decision-making. (3) Women living in the capital, of younger age, and with lower education levels experienced less coercion. (4) Being nulligravida and using contraception were associated with less coercion and better communication. (5) The use of an online tool during the pandemic expanded the program's reach to women.</p>","PeriodicalId":48692,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem","volume":"33 ","pages":"e4437"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.6910.4437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to analyze the reproductive autonomy of women during the COVID-19 pandemic, considering sociodemographic, clinical, and reproductive factors.

Method: a quantitative study with a cross-sectional design, conducted with 314 women aged 18 to 49 years old. Data were collected through an online questionnaire containing sociodemographic, clinical, and reproductive data, as well as the Reproductive Autonomy Scale. The Mann-Whitney and Student's t tests were used to compare variables.

Results: significant differences were found between the average scores of "decision-making" and marital status (p = <0.001); and "absence of coercion" and "communication" with age group (p = 0.03 e <0.001), residence (p = <0.001 and <0.01), schooling level (p = 0.02 e 0.02), pregnancy (p = <0.001 e 0.04) and contraception (p = 0.02 e <0.001).

Conclusion: not having a sexual partner positively influenced autonomy in reproductive decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic. Women of younger age, living in the capital, with higher education levels, who had never been pregnant, and who used contraceptives during the pandemic showed greater autonomy in the absence of coercion and communication. It was possible to identify the groups that require greater attention and interventions to support their sexual health and reproductive choices.

Background: (1) A high reproductive autonomy score was observed even during the pandemic. (2) Not having a stable partner positively influenced reproductive decision-making. (3) Women living in the capital, of younger age, and with lower education levels experienced less coercion. (4) Being nulligravida and using contraception were associated with less coercion and better communication. (5) The use of an online tool during the pandemic expanded the program's reach to women.

COVID-19大流行期间妇女的生殖自主权:一项横断面研究
目的:综合考虑社会人口、临床和生殖等因素,分析新冠肺炎大流行期间女性的生殖自主权。方法:采用横断面设计的定量研究,对314名年龄在18至49岁的女性进行了研究。数据通过包含社会人口统计、临床和生殖数据以及生殖自主量表的在线问卷收集。采用Mann-Whitney检验和Student’st检验比较变量。结果:“决策”平均分与婚姻状况之间存在显著差异(p =结论:无性伴侣对COVID-19大流行期间生殖决策自主权有积极影响。居住在首都、受教育程度较高、从未怀孕、在大流行病期间使用避孕药具的年轻妇女在没有强迫和沟通的情况下表现出更大的自主权。有可能确定需要更多关注和干预以支持其性健康和生殖选择的群体。背景:(1)即使在大流行期间,也观察到较高的生殖自主评分。(2)没有稳定的伴侣对生育决策有正向影响。(3)居住在首都、年龄较小、受教育程度较低的妇女受到的胁迫较少。(4)无配偶和采取避孕措施与较少的胁迫和更好的沟通有关。(5)大流行期间使用在线工具扩大了该方案对妇女的覆盖范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: A Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem constitui-se no órgão oficial de divulgação científica da Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo e do Centro Colaborador da OMS para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Enfermagem. Foi criada em abril de 1992 sendo sua primeira edição publicada em janeiro de 1993. No período de 1993 a 1997 tinha periodicidade semestral, de 1997 a 2000 trimestral e, a partir de janeiro de 2001, tem periodicidade bimestral. Caracteriza-se como periódico de circulação internacional, abrangendo predominantemente os países da América Latina e Caribe, embora seja também divulgado para assinantes dos Estados Unidos, Portugal e Espanha.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信