Behind the label: a qualitative study of the self-perceptions of individuals with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alanna K Chu, Wardat Yasmine Sehabi, Emma Kearns, Tim Aubry, Rinat Nissim, Paul Wheatley-Price, Sophie Lebel
{"title":"Behind the label: a qualitative study of the self-perceptions of individuals with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy.","authors":"Alanna K Chu, Wardat Yasmine Sehabi, Emma Kearns, Tim Aubry, Rinat Nissim, Paul Wheatley-Price, Sophie Lebel","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09152-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Individuals with lung cancer are living longer due to recent treatment advances such as immunotherapy and targeted therapy. The preferred label(s) of this new population are unknown. This is important as personal/advocacy benefits have been reported by using \"survivor\" or \"thriver\" by some groups; however, these same labels have been rejected by others. The goal of the present study was to explore the meaning of different labels and reasons given for preferred label(s) among people diagnosed with advanced lung cancer receiving these treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study is part of a larger project conducted in partnership with Lung Cancer Canada to identify the supportive care needs of individuals with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy. Participants (n = 24) were recruited across Canada. In-depth qualitative interviews were coded using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Labels are important and serve four functions: meaning-making, acceptance, maintaining a positive outlook, and shaping how people in participants' circle understand and react to them. Participants felt their experience did not fit traditional labels. While \"survivor\" was associated with maintaining a positive outlook by some, it was strongly rejected by others as it implied a cure. Some felt \"patient\" conveyed realism, but others found it deprived them of empowerment. \"Person living with cancer\" was perceived as reflecting the ongoing nature of the disease while not overly centring cancer within a person's identity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants identified with various labels and emphasized how the label reflected their identity and psychological experiences of the disease. Thus, it is important that clinicians elicit and use individuals' preferred terms, and default to person-first language if unknown.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 3","pages":"152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09152-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Individuals with lung cancer are living longer due to recent treatment advances such as immunotherapy and targeted therapy. The preferred label(s) of this new population are unknown. This is important as personal/advocacy benefits have been reported by using "survivor" or "thriver" by some groups; however, these same labels have been rejected by others. The goal of the present study was to explore the meaning of different labels and reasons given for preferred label(s) among people diagnosed with advanced lung cancer receiving these treatments.

Methods: The study is part of a larger project conducted in partnership with Lung Cancer Canada to identify the supportive care needs of individuals with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy. Participants (n = 24) were recruited across Canada. In-depth qualitative interviews were coded using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Labels are important and serve four functions: meaning-making, acceptance, maintaining a positive outlook, and shaping how people in participants' circle understand and react to them. Participants felt their experience did not fit traditional labels. While "survivor" was associated with maintaining a positive outlook by some, it was strongly rejected by others as it implied a cure. Some felt "patient" conveyed realism, but others found it deprived them of empowerment. "Person living with cancer" was perceived as reflecting the ongoing nature of the disease while not overly centring cancer within a person's identity.

Conclusion: Participants identified with various labels and emphasized how the label reflected their identity and psychological experiences of the disease. Thus, it is important that clinicians elicit and use individuals' preferred terms, and default to person-first language if unknown.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信