Who is to blame for the 'problem' of teenage pregnancy? Narratives of blame in two South African communities.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zoe Duby, Brittany Bunce, Chantal Fowler, Kate Bergh, Kim Jonas, Nevilene Slingers, Catherine Mathews, Fareed Abdullah
{"title":"Who is to blame for the 'problem' of teenage pregnancy? Narratives of blame in two South African communities.","authors":"Zoe Duby, Brittany Bunce, Chantal Fowler, Kate Bergh, Kim Jonas, Nevilene Slingers, Catherine Mathews, Fareed Abdullah","doi":"10.1186/s12978-025-01958-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The framing of teenage pregnancy in social discourse influences the way in which adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) are treated, the extent to which they are supported, and to which they are able to engage with services and enact pregnancy prevention behaviours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through the analysis of data from a qualitative study conducted in the South African communities of Newcastle in KwaZulu-Natal and Moretele in the North-West province, we explored narratives of blame for teenage pregnancy. Data derived from seventy-one in-depth interviews conducted with forty AGYW aged between 15 and 24, twenty-four parents/caregivers of AGYW, five service providers, ten school educators, and two other community members. Interpretation of data drew upon blame, attribution and framing theories.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The overall framing of teenage pregnancy was overwhelmingly negative, with participants labelling it immoral and 'wrong'. Findings were arranged into key thematic areas that emerged in the data relating to blame for teenage pregnancy: the individual centred 'wrong-girl' and developmental discourses, in which blame was apportioned to AGYW for being immature, reckless, irresponsible, disobedient and greedy; the 'wrong-family' discourse in which blame was attributed to parents of AGYW for poor parenting and failing to adequately care for the adolescents in their responsibility; the 'wrong-men' discourse in which blame was attributed to men for luring AGYW into transactional sex, and for perpetrating gender-based violence; and lastly the 'wrong-society' discourse which attributed blame to contextual/structural factors such as poverty, a high volume of unregulated drinking establishments, and a lack of youth-friendly services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policies, interventions and programmes focusing on adolescents' sexual and reproductive health need to carefully consider the framing and narratives of blame and responsibility. There is an urgent need to shift away from the individualised moralistic shaming of pregnant AGYW, towards a recognition of a complex interplay of multilevel factors that enable or constrain AGYW's agency. Policies and programmes should focus on both providing sufficient support to AGYW, while also addressing structural factors and harmful narratives and thus create the conditions necessary to enable AGYW to enact safe, informed, agentic and responsible decisions and behaviours about their own sexual and reproductive health.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":"22 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11796155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-025-01958-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The framing of teenage pregnancy in social discourse influences the way in which adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) are treated, the extent to which they are supported, and to which they are able to engage with services and enact pregnancy prevention behaviours.

Methods: Through the analysis of data from a qualitative study conducted in the South African communities of Newcastle in KwaZulu-Natal and Moretele in the North-West province, we explored narratives of blame for teenage pregnancy. Data derived from seventy-one in-depth interviews conducted with forty AGYW aged between 15 and 24, twenty-four parents/caregivers of AGYW, five service providers, ten school educators, and two other community members. Interpretation of data drew upon blame, attribution and framing theories.

Findings: The overall framing of teenage pregnancy was overwhelmingly negative, with participants labelling it immoral and 'wrong'. Findings were arranged into key thematic areas that emerged in the data relating to blame for teenage pregnancy: the individual centred 'wrong-girl' and developmental discourses, in which blame was apportioned to AGYW for being immature, reckless, irresponsible, disobedient and greedy; the 'wrong-family' discourse in which blame was attributed to parents of AGYW for poor parenting and failing to adequately care for the adolescents in their responsibility; the 'wrong-men' discourse in which blame was attributed to men for luring AGYW into transactional sex, and for perpetrating gender-based violence; and lastly the 'wrong-society' discourse which attributed blame to contextual/structural factors such as poverty, a high volume of unregulated drinking establishments, and a lack of youth-friendly services.

Conclusions: Policies, interventions and programmes focusing on adolescents' sexual and reproductive health need to carefully consider the framing and narratives of blame and responsibility. There is an urgent need to shift away from the individualised moralistic shaming of pregnant AGYW, towards a recognition of a complex interplay of multilevel factors that enable or constrain AGYW's agency. Policies and programmes should focus on both providing sufficient support to AGYW, while also addressing structural factors and harmful narratives and thus create the conditions necessary to enable AGYW to enact safe, informed, agentic and responsible decisions and behaviours about their own sexual and reproductive health.

谁该为青少年怀孕的“问题”负责?两个南非社区的相互指责。
背景:社会话语中对少女怀孕的界定影响到少女和年轻妇女(AGYW)受到对待的方式、她们得到支持的程度,以及她们参与服务和制定预防怀孕行为的能力。方法:通过分析在夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省纽卡斯尔和西北省莫雷特莱的南非社区进行的定性研究的数据,我们探讨了少女怀孕的指责叙述。数据来源于71次深度访谈,访谈对象包括40名年龄在15至24岁之间的AGYW, 24名AGYW的父母/照顾者,5名服务提供者,10名学校教育工作者和2名其他社区成员。对数据的解释借鉴了责备、归因和框架理论。调查结果:青少年怀孕的总体框架是负面的,参与者认为这是不道德的和“错误的”。调查结果被安排到与少女怀孕的责任相关的数据中出现的关键主题领域:以个人为中心的“错误女孩”和发展话语,其中指责AGYW不成熟,鲁莽,不负责任,不听话和贪婪;在“错误的家庭”的话语中,指责AGYW的父母养育不当,未能充分照顾青少年的责任;在“错误的男人”的话语中,指责男人引诱AGYW进行交易性行为,并实施基于性别的暴力;最后,“错误的社会”话语将责任归咎于环境/结构因素,如贫困,大量不受管制的饮酒场所,以及缺乏对青年友好的服务。结论:以青少年性健康和生殖健康为重点的政策、干预措施和方案需要仔细考虑责备和责任的框架和叙述。我们迫切需要摆脱对怀孕女性的个人道德羞辱,转而认识到多重因素的复杂相互作用,这些因素能够促进或限制女性的能动性。政策和方案应侧重于向妇女提供充分支持,同时也要解决结构性因素和有害说法,从而创造必要条件,使妇女能够就其自身的性健康和生殖健康作出安全、知情、主动和负责任的决定和行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
220
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access. Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信