Transarterial Chemoembolization with Radiofrequency Ablation versus Surgical Resection for Small Late-Recurrence Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1148/radiol.241096
Yao-Jun Zhang, Jinbin Chen, Zhongguo Zhou, Dandan Hu, Juncheng Wang, Yangxun Pan, Yizhen Fu, Zili Hu, Li Xu, Min-Shan Chen
{"title":"Transarterial Chemoembolization with Radiofrequency Ablation versus Surgical Resection for Small Late-Recurrence Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Yao-Jun Zhang, Jinbin Chen, Zhongguo Zhou, Dandan Hu, Juncheng Wang, Yangxun Pan, Yizhen Fu, Zili Hu, Li Xu, Min-Shan Chen","doi":"10.1148/radiol.241096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has comparable clinical outcomes to surgical resection (SR) for treating small recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, whether combined transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with RFA (hereafter, TACE-RFA) outperforms SR for treating small late-recurrence HCCs remains unknown. Purpose To compare the clinical outcome of TACE-RFA with that of SR in patients with small late-recurrence HCCs. Materials and Methods This randomized clinical trial recruited patients between July 2013 and March 2019. Patients with small late-recurrence HCCs (a single recurrent HCC nodule [≤ 5 cm in diameter] or three or fewer nodules [each ≤ 3 cm in diameter] and recurrence at least 12 months after radical therapy of primary HCC) were randomly assigned to receive TACE-RFA or SR. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The secondary end points included recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the incidence of complications. OS and RFS were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results In the intention-to-treat analysis, 210 patients (mean age, 52 years ± 12 [SD]; 194 male) were included, with 105 patients in each group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 99%, 81%, and 69%, respectively, in the TACE-RFA group and 96%, 81%, and 76%, respectively, in the SR group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 95% CI: 0.81, 2.23; <i>P</i> = .26). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates were 71%, 38%, and 24%, respectively, in the TACE-RFA group and 73%, 43%, and 29%, respectively, in the SR group (HR, 1.05; 95% CI: 0.76, 1.45; <i>P</i> = .78). The incidence of complications was greater in the SR group than in the TACE-RFA group (41% [43 of 104] vs 24% [23 of 96]; <i>P</i> = .01). Conclusion For patients with small late-recurrence HCCs, TACE-RFA did not yield better survival outcomes than SR. However, the incidence of complications was lower in patients who received TACE-RFA therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01833286 © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Ronot in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"314 2","pages":"e241096"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.241096","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has comparable clinical outcomes to surgical resection (SR) for treating small recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, whether combined transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with RFA (hereafter, TACE-RFA) outperforms SR for treating small late-recurrence HCCs remains unknown. Purpose To compare the clinical outcome of TACE-RFA with that of SR in patients with small late-recurrence HCCs. Materials and Methods This randomized clinical trial recruited patients between July 2013 and March 2019. Patients with small late-recurrence HCCs (a single recurrent HCC nodule [≤ 5 cm in diameter] or three or fewer nodules [each ≤ 3 cm in diameter] and recurrence at least 12 months after radical therapy of primary HCC) were randomly assigned to receive TACE-RFA or SR. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The secondary end points included recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the incidence of complications. OS and RFS were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results In the intention-to-treat analysis, 210 patients (mean age, 52 years ± 12 [SD]; 194 male) were included, with 105 patients in each group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 99%, 81%, and 69%, respectively, in the TACE-RFA group and 96%, 81%, and 76%, respectively, in the SR group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 95% CI: 0.81, 2.23; P = .26). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates were 71%, 38%, and 24%, respectively, in the TACE-RFA group and 73%, 43%, and 29%, respectively, in the SR group (HR, 1.05; 95% CI: 0.76, 1.45; P = .78). The incidence of complications was greater in the SR group than in the TACE-RFA group (41% [43 of 104] vs 24% [23 of 96]; P = .01). Conclusion For patients with small late-recurrence HCCs, TACE-RFA did not yield better survival outcomes than SR. However, the incidence of complications was lower in patients who received TACE-RFA therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01833286 © RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Ronot in this issue.

经动脉化疗栓塞射频消融与手术切除治疗小的晚期复发肝细胞癌。
背景射频消融(RFA)治疗复发性小肝细胞癌(HCC)的临床效果与手术切除(SR)相当。然而,经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合RFA(以下简称TACE-RFA)在治疗小的晚期复发hcc方面是否优于SR仍然未知。目的比较TACE-RFA与SR治疗晚期小复发hcc的临床疗效。该随机临床试验于2013年7月至2019年3月招募患者。小型晚期复发HCC患者(单个复发HCC结节[直径≤5cm]或三个或更少结节[每个直径≤3cm]且原发性HCC根治后至少12个月复发)被随机分配接受TACE-RFA或sr治疗。主要终点为总生存期(OS)。次要终点包括无复发生存期(RFS)和并发症发生率。采用Kaplan-Meier法和log-rank检验评价OS和RFS。结果意向治疗分析中,210例患者(平均年龄52岁±12岁[SD];194例(男性),每组105例。TACE-RFA组1年、3年和5年OS分别为99%、81%和69%,SR组分别为96%、81%和76%(风险比[HR], 1.34;95% ci: 0.81, 2.23;P = .26)。TACE-RFA组1、3、5年RFS率分别为71%、38%和24%,SR组分别为73%、43%和29% (HR, 1.05;95% ci: 0.76, 1.45;P = .78)。SR组并发症发生率高于TACE-RFA组(41% [43 / 104]vs 24% [23 / 96];P = 0.01)。结论对于小的晚期复发hcc患者,TACE-RFA并不比sr获得更好的生存结果,但接受TACE-RFA治疗的患者并发症发生率较低。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01833286©RSNA, 2025本文提供补充材料。请参阅Ronot在本期的社论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiology
Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
35.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
596
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Published regularly since 1923 by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiology has long been recognized as the authoritative reference for the most current, clinically relevant and highest quality research in the field of radiology. Each month the journal publishes approximately 240 pages of peer-reviewed original research, authoritative reviews, well-balanced commentary on significant articles, and expert opinion on new techniques and technologies. Radiology publishes cutting edge and impactful imaging research articles in radiology and medical imaging in order to help improve human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信