Interpreting the CTCF-mediated sequence grammar of genome folding with AkitaV2.

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Paulina N Smaruj, Fahad Kamulegeya, David R Kelley, Geoffrey Fudenberg
{"title":"Interpreting the CTCF-mediated sequence grammar of genome folding with AkitaV2.","authors":"Paulina N Smaruj, Fahad Kamulegeya, David R Kelley, Geoffrey Fudenberg","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interphase mammalian genomes are folded in 3D with complex locus-specific patterns that impact gene regulation. CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor) is a key architectural protein that binds specific DNA sites, halts cohesin-mediated loop extrusion, and enables long-range chromatin interactions. There are hundreds of thousands of annotated CTCF-binding sites in mammalian genomes; disruptions of some result in distinct phenotypes, while others have no visible effect. Despite their importance, the determinants of which CTCF sites are necessary for genome folding and gene regulation remain unclear. Here, we update and utilize Akita, a convolutional neural network model, to extract the sequence preferences and grammar of CTCF contributing to genome folding. Our analyses of individual CTCF sites reveal four predictions: (i) only a small fraction of genomic sites are impactful; (ii) impact is highly dependent on sequences flanking the core CTCF binding motif; (iii) core and flanking nucleotides contribute largely additively to the overall impact of a site; (iv) sites created as combinations of different core and flanking sequences have impacts proportional to the product of their average impacts, i.e. they are broadly compatible. Our analysis of collections of CTCF sites make two predictions for multi-motif grammar: (i) insulation strength depends on the number of CTCF sites within a cluster, and (ii) pattern formation is governed by the orientation and spacing of these sites, rather than any inherent specialization of the CTCF motifs themselves. In sum, we present a framework for using neural network models to probe the sequences instructing genome folding and provide a number of predictions to guide future experimental inquiries.</p>","PeriodicalId":20241,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Computational Biology","volume":"21 2","pages":"e1012824"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Computational Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012824","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interphase mammalian genomes are folded in 3D with complex locus-specific patterns that impact gene regulation. CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor) is a key architectural protein that binds specific DNA sites, halts cohesin-mediated loop extrusion, and enables long-range chromatin interactions. There are hundreds of thousands of annotated CTCF-binding sites in mammalian genomes; disruptions of some result in distinct phenotypes, while others have no visible effect. Despite their importance, the determinants of which CTCF sites are necessary for genome folding and gene regulation remain unclear. Here, we update and utilize Akita, a convolutional neural network model, to extract the sequence preferences and grammar of CTCF contributing to genome folding. Our analyses of individual CTCF sites reveal four predictions: (i) only a small fraction of genomic sites are impactful; (ii) impact is highly dependent on sequences flanking the core CTCF binding motif; (iii) core and flanking nucleotides contribute largely additively to the overall impact of a site; (iv) sites created as combinations of different core and flanking sequences have impacts proportional to the product of their average impacts, i.e. they are broadly compatible. Our analysis of collections of CTCF sites make two predictions for multi-motif grammar: (i) insulation strength depends on the number of CTCF sites within a cluster, and (ii) pattern formation is governed by the orientation and spacing of these sites, rather than any inherent specialization of the CTCF motifs themselves. In sum, we present a framework for using neural network models to probe the sequences instructing genome folding and provide a number of predictions to guide future experimental inquiries.

哺乳动物间期基因组呈三维折叠,具有复杂的基因座特异性模式,对基因调控产生影响。CTCF(CCCTC结合因子)是一种关键的结构蛋白,它能结合特定的DNA位点,阻止凝聚素介导的环挤出,并实现长程染色质相互作用。哺乳动物基因组中有成千上万个注释的 CTCF 结合位点;一些位点的破坏会导致不同的表型,而另一些则没有明显影响。尽管CTCF位点非常重要,但哪些CTCF位点是基因组折叠和基因调控所必需的决定因素仍不清楚。在这里,我们更新并利用卷积神经网络模型 Akita 来提取有助于基因组折叠的 CTCF 序列偏好和语法。我们对单个 CTCF 位点的分析揭示了四项预测:(i) 只有一小部分基因组位点具有影响;(ii) 影响高度依赖于 CTCF 核心结合基序的侧翼序列;(iii) 核心核苷酸和侧翼核苷酸对一个位点的整体影响的贡献在很大程度上是相加的;(iv) 由不同核心序列和侧翼序列组合而成的位点的影响与其平均影响的乘积成正比,即它们具有广泛的兼容性。我们对 CTCF 位点集合的分析为多主题语法做出了两个预测:(i) 绝缘强度取决于集群内 CTCF 位点的数量;(ii) 模式的形成受这些位点的方向和间距的制约,而不是受 CTCF 主题本身的任何固有特化的制约。总之,我们提出了一个使用神经网络模型探测指导基因组折叠的序列的框架,并提供了一些预测来指导未来的实验研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Computational Biology
PLoS Computational Biology BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.70%
发文量
820
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: PLOS Computational Biology features works of exceptional significance that further our understanding of living systems at all scales—from molecules and cells, to patient populations and ecosystems—through the application of computational methods. Readers include life and computational scientists, who can take the important findings presented here to the next level of discovery. Research articles must be declared as belonging to a relevant section. More information about the sections can be found in the submission guidelines. Research articles should model aspects of biological systems, demonstrate both methodological and scientific novelty, and provide profound new biological insights. Generally, reliability and significance of biological discovery through computation should be validated and enriched by experimental studies. Inclusion of experimental validation is not required for publication, but should be referenced where possible. Inclusion of experimental validation of a modest biological discovery through computation does not render a manuscript suitable for PLOS Computational Biology. Research articles specifically designated as Methods papers should describe outstanding methods of exceptional importance that have been shown, or have the promise to provide new biological insights. The method must already be widely adopted, or have the promise of wide adoption by a broad community of users. Enhancements to existing published methods will only be considered if those enhancements bring exceptional new capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信