The Effect of Gluing Versus Suturing of the Stapler Line in Sleeve Gastrectomy on Weight Loss.

IF 2.9 3区医学 Q1 SURGERY

Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1007/s11695-025-07728-5

Harbi Khalayleh, Ashraf Hallaj, Amir Shweiki, Barak Bar-Zakai, Shimon Sapojnikov, Ashraf Imam, Abed Khalaileh

{"title":"The Effect of Gluing Versus Suturing of the Stapler Line in Sleeve Gastrectomy on Weight Loss.","authors":"Harbi Khalayleh, Ashraf Hallaj, Amir Shweiki, Barak Bar-Zakai, Shimon Sapojnikov, Ashraf Imam, Abed Khalaileh","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07728-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Stapler line reinforcement during sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was assessed thoroughly in the context of postoperative complications focusing on leakage and bleeding. However, the effect of stapler line reinforcement techniques on the short- and long-term weight loss is still unclear and lacking. We hypothesize that inverting of the stapler line by Lembert suturing could lead to further additional reduction of the remnant gastric volume and accordingly a more significant weight reduction.Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients that underwent LSG (2012-2018) from the two university hospitals. The first hospital routinely performed oversewing with inversion of the stapler line (first group, Lembert suture), while the second university hospital performed LSG without stapler line oversewing and inversion, but routinely used VeraSeal glue (second group, non-Lembert); both groups were compared in terms of weight loss and complications.Results: Four hundred eighty and 550 patients underwent LSG in the first and second hospital, consequently. The mean BMI change and EBWL at 1, 3, and 5 years were better in the first group than in second group. The mean last follow-up BMI was significantly lower in Lembert group (29.8 ± 5.2kg/m2) than in non-Lembert group (32.9 ± 6.7 kg/m2), P = 0.001. The mean EBWL at last follow-up point was significantly better for the Lembert group as compared to non-Lembert group (73.7 ± 26.59 versus 57.12 ± 27.71, P = 0.001).Conclusions: Lembert suture line oversewing and inversion in LSG is associated with noticeable improvement in weight loss outcomes at 1, 3, and 5 years and last follow-up compared to LSG with VeraSeal gluing.","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07728-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stapler line reinforcement during sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was assessed thoroughly in the context of postoperative complications focusing on leakage and bleeding. However, the effect of stapler line reinforcement techniques on the short- and long-term weight loss is still unclear and lacking. We hypothesize that inverting of the stapler line by Lembert suturing could lead to further additional reduction of the remnant gastric volume and accordingly a more significant weight reduction.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients that underwent LSG (2012-2018) from the two university hospitals. The first hospital routinely performed oversewing with inversion of the stapler line (first group, Lembert suture), while the second university hospital performed LSG without stapler line oversewing and inversion, but routinely used VeraSeal glue (second group, non-Lembert); both groups were compared in terms of weight loss and complications.

Results: Four hundred eighty and 550 patients underwent LSG in the first and second hospital, consequently. The mean BMI change and EBWL at 1, 3, and 5 years were better in the first group than in second group. The mean last follow-up BMI was significantly lower in Lembert group (29.8 ± 5.2kg/m²) than in non-Lembert group (32.9 ± 6.7 kg/m²), P = 0.001. The mean EBWL at last follow-up point was significantly better for the Lembert group as compared to non-Lembert group (73.7 ± 26.59 versus 57.12 ± 27.71, P = 0.001).

Conclusions: Lembert suture line oversewing and inversion in LSG is associated with noticeable improvement in weight loss outcomes at 1, 3, and 5 years and last follow-up compared to LSG with VeraSeal gluing.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Obesity Surgery 医学-外科

CiteScore

5.80

自引率

24.10%

发文量

567

审稿时长

3-6 weeks

期刊介绍： Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.