Effectiveness of Attentional Bias Modification Combined With Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Reducing Relapse Risk and Cravings in Male Patients With Alcohol Use Disorder: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Yoshifumi Amano, Kohei Koizumi, Hirokazu Takizawa, Shota Tasaka, Toyohiro Hamaguchi
{"title":"Effectiveness of Attentional Bias Modification Combined With Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Reducing Relapse Risk and Cravings in Male Patients With Alcohol Use Disorder: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yoshifumi Amano, Kohei Koizumi, Hirokazu Takizawa, Shota Tasaka, Toyohiro Hamaguchi","doi":"10.1002/npr2.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is characterized by severe dependence on alcohol, poor impulse control, and heightened attention to alcohol-related cues. Attention bias modification (ABM) retrains individuals to distract attention from alcohol-related cues. This study investigates the effect of combining ABM with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to reduce relapse risk and cravings in male patients with AUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-randomized controlled trial was conducted among male inpatients diagnosed with AUD. Participants were divided into an intervention group receiving ABM in addition to CBT and a control group receiving CBT with a placebo intervention. The primary outcomes-risk of relapse and craving levels-were measured using the Alcohol Relapse Risk Scale (ARRS) and a visual analog scale (VAS), respectively. Participants underwent weekly sessions over 6 weeks, and outcomes were analyzed using generalized linear models (GLMs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis did not reveal significant interactions between the intervention group and time for ARRS scores and craving levels. Both groups experienced a reduction in relapse risk and cravings. However, there was no significant difference between the ABM + CBT and CBT-only groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the combined ABM and CBT intervention did not result in statistically significant reductions in relapse risk and cravings compared to CBT alone, the overall reduction in these outcomes in both groups highlights the effectiveness of CBT in treating AUD. Future studies should use naturalistic settings and tailor the intervention to individual cognitive profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":19137,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports","volume":"45 1","pages":"e70002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/npr2.70002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is characterized by severe dependence on alcohol, poor impulse control, and heightened attention to alcohol-related cues. Attention bias modification (ABM) retrains individuals to distract attention from alcohol-related cues. This study investigates the effect of combining ABM with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to reduce relapse risk and cravings in male patients with AUD.

Methods: A quasi-randomized controlled trial was conducted among male inpatients diagnosed with AUD. Participants were divided into an intervention group receiving ABM in addition to CBT and a control group receiving CBT with a placebo intervention. The primary outcomes-risk of relapse and craving levels-were measured using the Alcohol Relapse Risk Scale (ARRS) and a visual analog scale (VAS), respectively. Participants underwent weekly sessions over 6 weeks, and outcomes were analyzed using generalized linear models (GLMs).

Results: The analysis did not reveal significant interactions between the intervention group and time for ARRS scores and craving levels. Both groups experienced a reduction in relapse risk and cravings. However, there was no significant difference between the ABM + CBT and CBT-only groups.

Conclusions: Although the combined ABM and CBT intervention did not result in statistically significant reductions in relapse risk and cravings compared to CBT alone, the overall reduction in these outcomes in both groups highlights the effectiveness of CBT in treating AUD. Future studies should use naturalistic settings and tailor the intervention to individual cognitive profiles.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

注意偏倚矫正联合认知行为疗法降低男性酒精使用障碍患者复发风险和渴望的有效性:一项准随机对照试验
背景:酒精使用障碍(AUD)的特征是严重依赖酒精,冲动控制能力差,对酒精相关线索的高度关注。注意偏差修正(ABM)重新训练个体将注意力从酒精相关线索上转移。本研究探讨ABM联合认知行为疗法(CBT)降低男性AUD患者复发风险和渴望的效果。方法:对诊断为AUD的男性住院患者进行准随机对照试验。参与者被分为接受ABM和CBT的干预组和接受CBT和安慰剂干预的对照组。主要结果-复发风险和渴望水平-分别使用酒精复发风险量表(ARRS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行测量。参与者接受为期6周的每周治疗,并使用广义线性模型(GLMs)分析结果。结果:分析没有显示干预组与ARRS评分和渴望水平的时间之间有显著的相互作用。两组都经历了复发风险和渴望的降低。然而,ABM + CBT组和CBT组之间没有显著差异。结论:尽管与单独使用CBT相比,ABM和CBT联合干预并没有导致复发风险和渴望的统计学显著降低,但两组中这些结果的总体降低突出了CBT治疗AUD的有效性。未来的研究应该使用自然环境,并根据个体的认知概况调整干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信