Cross-Platform Analysis of Mammography Narratives: A Comparative Study on Social Media Engagement.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2025-01-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.17294/2330-0698.2100
Thomas Stirrat, Jonathan Garner, Parth Tailor, Daniel Weitz, Muhammad Umair, Yusuf T Akpolat
{"title":"Cross-Platform Analysis of Mammography Narratives: A Comparative Study on Social Media Engagement.","authors":"Thomas Stirrat, Jonathan Garner, Parth Tailor, Daniel Weitz, Muhammad Umair, Yusuf T Akpolat","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.2100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines the representation of mammography on social media platforms, specifically, X (Twitter), Facebook, TikTok, and Instagram, from 2006 to 2023. X (Twitter) went public in 2006, Facebook in 2004, Instagram in 2012, and TikTok in 2018 (after merging with Musical.ly). The analysis starts from after the public launch years to analyze personal experiences shared online.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective content analysis was conducted on 1,771 posts using specific hashtags related to mammography. Posts were categorized into themes including emotional and psychological impacts, clinical and procedural details, and social and supportive interactions. The analysis involved summarizing the distribution of themes across different social media platforms, focusing on frequency counts and percentages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that, among included posts, Instagram hosted the most discussions (621 posts), followed by TikTok (457 posts), X (Twitter) (403 posts), and Facebook (290 posts). Key themes identified included raising awareness (1,735 posts), spreading positivity (1,675 posts), and discussing clinical aspects, such as diagnosis (1,197 posts) and quality of life (1,011 posts). Posts often highlighted concerns about discomfort (701 posts) and anxiety (835 posts) related to mammography, while also emphasizing the importance of early detection and the support found within online communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social media serves as a powerful tool for public health communication, offering a mix of positive narratives and highlighting concerns about mammography. The significant engagement from the general public reflects a diverse array of perspectives that can inform future health communication strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":"12 1","pages":"9-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789821/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.2100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the representation of mammography on social media platforms, specifically, X (Twitter), Facebook, TikTok, and Instagram, from 2006 to 2023. X (Twitter) went public in 2006, Facebook in 2004, Instagram in 2012, and TikTok in 2018 (after merging with Musical.ly). The analysis starts from after the public launch years to analyze personal experiences shared online.

Methods: A retrospective content analysis was conducted on 1,771 posts using specific hashtags related to mammography. Posts were categorized into themes including emotional and psychological impacts, clinical and procedural details, and social and supportive interactions. The analysis involved summarizing the distribution of themes across different social media platforms, focusing on frequency counts and percentages.

Results: The analysis revealed that, among included posts, Instagram hosted the most discussions (621 posts), followed by TikTok (457 posts), X (Twitter) (403 posts), and Facebook (290 posts). Key themes identified included raising awareness (1,735 posts), spreading positivity (1,675 posts), and discussing clinical aspects, such as diagnosis (1,197 posts) and quality of life (1,011 posts). Posts often highlighted concerns about discomfort (701 posts) and anxiety (835 posts) related to mammography, while also emphasizing the importance of early detection and the support found within online communities.

Conclusions: Social media serves as a powerful tool for public health communication, offering a mix of positive narratives and highlighting concerns about mammography. The significant engagement from the general public reflects a diverse array of perspectives that can inform future health communication strategies.

目的:本研究探讨了 2006 年至 2023 年期间乳腺 X(Twitter)、Facebook、TikTok 和 Instagram 等社交媒体平台上乳腺摄影的表现形式。X(推特)于 2006 年上市,Facebook 于 2004 年上市,Instagram 于 2012 年上市,TikTok 于 2018 年上市(与 Musical.ly 合并后)。分析从上市后的几年开始,分析网上分享的个人经历:对1771条使用与乳房X光摄影相关的特定标签的帖子进行了回顾性内容分析。帖子按主题分类,包括情绪和心理影响、临床和程序细节以及社会和支持性互动。分析包括总结主题在不同社交媒体平台上的分布情况,重点是频率计数和百分比:分析结果显示,在包含的帖子中,Instagram 上的讨论最多(621 篇帖子),其次是 TikTok(457 篇帖子)、X(Twitter)(403 篇帖子)和 Facebook(290 篇帖子)。确定的关键主题包括提高认识(1,735 篇帖子)、传播积极信息(1,675 篇帖子)以及讨论临床方面的问题,如诊断(1,197 篇帖子)和生活质量(1,011 篇帖子)。帖子通常强调了与乳腺 X 射线照相有关的不适(701 篇帖子)和焦虑(835 篇帖子),同时也强调了早期发现的重要性以及在网络社区中找到的支持:结论:社交媒体是公共卫生传播的有力工具,它既有正面的叙述,也强调了人们对乳房 X 射线照相术的担忧。普通公众的大量参与反映了各种不同的观点,可以为未来的健康传播策略提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信