Factors affecting visual outcomes after dural venous sinus stenting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Shuran Wang, Raynald, Runhua Zhang, Hongchao Yang, Xu Tong, Shuang Song, Xiaofang Liang, Yilong Wang, Zhongrong Miao, Dapeng Mo
{"title":"Factors affecting visual outcomes after dural venous sinus stenting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.","authors":"Shuran Wang, Raynald, Runhua Zhang, Hongchao Yang, Xu Tong, Shuang Song, Xiaofang Liang, Yilong Wang, Zhongrong Miao, Dapeng Mo","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify factors at baseline associated with visual outcomes of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) with venous sinus stenosis who underwent venous sinus stenting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study eyes were divided into two groups according to mean deviation (MD) at 6-month post-stenting follow-up: MD better than -2.0 dB (the favorable visual outcome group) and equal to -2.0 or worse (the poorer visual outcome group). Variables at baseline between the two groups were compared. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed to identify the factors at baseline associated with poorer MD outcomes at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The poorer recovery group had a lower incidence of tinnitus (5.9% vs 27.5%, P=0.015), worse initial best corrected visual acuity (0.22 vs 0, in logMAR, P=0.000), worse preoperative MD (-8.64 vs -3.05, P=0.000) and higher trans-stenotic gradient pressure (19.5 vs 16, P=0.002) and total cranial gradient pressure (TCGP) (25.75 vs 18, P=0.000), lower ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness (90.5 vs 99, P=0.005), higher focal loss volume percentage (2.35 vs 0.84, P=0.002) and global loss volume percentage (4.87 vs 1.8, P=0.012) of GCC. Multivariate analysis showed that worse preoperative MD and higher TCGP (OR 45.61, 95% CI 5.21 to 399.48; P=0.001 and OR 8.45, 95% CI 1.60 to 44.67; P=0.012, respectively) were associated with an increased risk of poorer MD outcomes at the 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that worse preoperative MD and higher TCGP at baseline may be associated with poorer visual outcomes after stenting treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022727","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to identify factors at baseline associated with visual outcomes of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) with venous sinus stenosis who underwent venous sinus stenting.

Methods: The study eyes were divided into two groups according to mean deviation (MD) at 6-month post-stenting follow-up: MD better than -2.0 dB (the favorable visual outcome group) and equal to -2.0 or worse (the poorer visual outcome group). Variables at baseline between the two groups were compared. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed to identify the factors at baseline associated with poorer MD outcomes at 6 months.

Results: The poorer recovery group had a lower incidence of tinnitus (5.9% vs 27.5%, P=0.015), worse initial best corrected visual acuity (0.22 vs 0, in logMAR, P=0.000), worse preoperative MD (-8.64 vs -3.05, P=0.000) and higher trans-stenotic gradient pressure (19.5 vs 16, P=0.002) and total cranial gradient pressure (TCGP) (25.75 vs 18, P=0.000), lower ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness (90.5 vs 99, P=0.005), higher focal loss volume percentage (2.35 vs 0.84, P=0.002) and global loss volume percentage (4.87 vs 1.8, P=0.012) of GCC. Multivariate analysis showed that worse preoperative MD and higher TCGP (OR 45.61, 95% CI 5.21 to 399.48; P=0.001 and OR 8.45, 95% CI 1.60 to 44.67; P=0.012, respectively) were associated with an increased risk of poorer MD outcomes at the 6-month follow-up.

Conclusion: This study found that worse preoperative MD and higher TCGP at baseline may be associated with poorer visual outcomes after stenting treatment.

影响特发性颅内高压患者硬脑膜静脉窦支架植入术后视力的因素。
目的:本研究旨在确定特发性颅内高压(IIH)合并静脉窦狭窄患者行静脉窦支架植入术后视力预后的基线相关因素。方法:根据研究眼在支架置入术后6个月随访时的平均偏差(MD)分为两组:MD优于-2.0 dB(视力结果良好组),MD等于-2.0或更差(视力结果较差组)。比较两组的基线变量。采用多变量logistic回归模型确定与6个月时较差MD结果相关的基线因素。结果:恢复较差组耳鸣发生率较低(5.9% vs 27.5%, P=0.015),初始最佳矫正视力较差(0.22 vs 0, logMAR, P=0.000),术前MD较差(-8.64 vs -3.05, P=0.000),经狭窄梯度压(19.5 vs 16, P=0.002)和总颅梯度压(TCGP)较高(25.75 vs 18, P=0.000),下神经节细胞复合物(GCC)厚度(90.5 vs 99, P=0.005),较高的focal loss体积百分比(2.35 vs 0.84),P=0.002)和GCC的全球损失量百分比(4.87 vs 1.8, P=0.012)。多因素分析显示术前MD较差,TCGP较高(OR 45.61, 95% CI 5.21 ~ 399.48;P=0.001, OR为8.45,95% CI 1.60 ~ 44.67;P=0.012)与6个月随访时不良MD预后风险增加相关。结论:本研究发现术前MD较差和基线TCGP较高可能与支架治疗后较差的视力结果相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信