Enhancing microbial predator-prey detection with network and trait-based analyses.

IF 13.8 1区 生物学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Cristina Martínez Rendón, Christina Braun, Maria Kappelsberger, Jens Boy, Angélica Casanova-Katny, Karin Glaser, Kenneth Dumack
{"title":"Enhancing microbial predator-prey detection with network and trait-based analyses.","authors":"Cristina Martínez Rendón, Christina Braun, Maria Kappelsberger, Jens Boy, Angélica Casanova-Katny, Karin Glaser, Kenneth Dumack","doi":"10.1186/s40168-025-02035-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Network analyses are often applied to microbial communities using sequencing survey datasets. However, associations in such networks do not necessarily indicate actual biotic interactions, and even if they do, the nature of the interactions commonly remains unclear. While network analyses are valuable for generating hypotheses, the inferred hypotheses are rarely experimentally confirmed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We employed cross-kingdom network analyses, applied trait-based functions to the microorganisms, and subsequently experimentally investigated the found putative predator-prey interactions to evaluate whether, and to what extent, correlations indicate actual predator-prey relationships. For this, we investigated algae and their protistan predators in biocrusts of three distinct polar regions, i.e., Svalbard, the Antarctic Peninsula, and Continental Antarctica. Network analyses using FlashWeave indicated that 89, 138, and 51 correlations occurred between predatory protists and algae, respectively. However, trait assignment revealed that only 4.7-9.3% of said correlations link predators to actually suitable prey. We further confirmed these results with HMSC modeling, which resulted in similar numbers of 7.5% and 4.8% linking predators to suitable prey for full co-occurrence and abundance models, respectively. The combination of network analyses and trait assignment increased confidence in the prediction of predator-prey interactions, as we show that 82% of all experimentally investigated correlations could be verified. Furthermore, we found that more vicious predators, i.e., predators with the highest growth rate in co-culture with their prey, exhibit higher stress and betweenness centrality - giving rise to the future possibility of determining important predators from their network statistics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results support the idea of using network analyses for inferring predator-prey interactions, but at the same time call for cautionary consideration of the results, by combining them with trait-based approaches to increase confidence in the prediction of biological interactions. Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":18447,"journal":{"name":"Microbiome","volume":"13 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":13.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-025-02035-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Network analyses are often applied to microbial communities using sequencing survey datasets. However, associations in such networks do not necessarily indicate actual biotic interactions, and even if they do, the nature of the interactions commonly remains unclear. While network analyses are valuable for generating hypotheses, the inferred hypotheses are rarely experimentally confirmed.

Results: We employed cross-kingdom network analyses, applied trait-based functions to the microorganisms, and subsequently experimentally investigated the found putative predator-prey interactions to evaluate whether, and to what extent, correlations indicate actual predator-prey relationships. For this, we investigated algae and their protistan predators in biocrusts of three distinct polar regions, i.e., Svalbard, the Antarctic Peninsula, and Continental Antarctica. Network analyses using FlashWeave indicated that 89, 138, and 51 correlations occurred between predatory protists and algae, respectively. However, trait assignment revealed that only 4.7-9.3% of said correlations link predators to actually suitable prey. We further confirmed these results with HMSC modeling, which resulted in similar numbers of 7.5% and 4.8% linking predators to suitable prey for full co-occurrence and abundance models, respectively. The combination of network analyses and trait assignment increased confidence in the prediction of predator-prey interactions, as we show that 82% of all experimentally investigated correlations could be verified. Furthermore, we found that more vicious predators, i.e., predators with the highest growth rate in co-culture with their prey, exhibit higher stress and betweenness centrality - giving rise to the future possibility of determining important predators from their network statistics.

Conclusions: Our results support the idea of using network analyses for inferring predator-prey interactions, but at the same time call for cautionary consideration of the results, by combining them with trait-based approaches to increase confidence in the prediction of biological interactions. Video Abstract.

利用网络和性状分析增强微生物捕食-猎物检测。
背景:网络分析通常应用于微生物群落使用测序调查数据集。然而,这种网络中的关联并不一定表明实际的生物相互作用,即使它们是,相互作用的性质通常仍然不清楚。虽然网络分析对产生假设很有价值,但推断出来的假设很少得到实验证实。结果:我们采用跨界网络分析,将基于特征的函数应用于微生物,并随后实验研究了发现的假定的捕食者-猎物相互作用,以评估相关性是否以及在多大程度上表明了实际的捕食者-猎物关系。为此,我们研究了三个不同极地地区(即斯瓦尔巴群岛、南极半岛和南极洲大陆)生物壳中的藻类及其原生捕食者。利用FlashWeave进行的网络分析表明,捕食性原生生物和藻类之间的相关性分别为89、138和51。然而,性状分配显示,只有4.7% -9.3%的相关性将捕食者与真正合适的猎物联系起来。我们通过HMSC模型进一步证实了这些结果,结果表明,在完全共现和丰度模型中,捕食者与合适猎物的关联率分别为7.5%和4.8%。网络分析和性状分配的结合增加了预测捕食者-猎物相互作用的信心,因为我们表明82%的实验研究相关性可以得到验证。此外,我们还发现,更凶残的捕食者,即与猎物共培养中生长速度最高的捕食者,表现出更高的压力和中间性中心性,这为未来从其网络统计中确定重要捕食者提供了可能性。结论:我们的研究结果支持使用网络分析来推断捕食者-猎物相互作用的想法,但同时也呼吁对结果进行谨慎考虑,将其与基于特征的方法相结合,以增加预测生物相互作用的信心。视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbiome
Microbiome MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
198
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Microbiome is a journal that focuses on studies of microbiomes in humans, animals, plants, and the environment. It covers both natural and manipulated microbiomes, such as those in agriculture. The journal is interested in research that uses meta-omics approaches or novel bioinformatics tools and emphasizes the community/host interaction and structure-function relationship within the microbiome. Studies that go beyond descriptive omics surveys and include experimental or theoretical approaches will be considered for publication. The journal also encourages research that establishes cause and effect relationships and supports proposed microbiome functions. However, studies of individual microbial isolates/species without exploring their impact on the host or the complex microbiome structures and functions will not be considered for publication. Microbiome is indexed in BIOSIS, Current Contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citations Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信