Vivien Hébert, Sami Hamwi, Emmanuelle Tancrède-Bohin, Gaelle Quéreux, Anne Pham-Ledard, Frédéric Caux, Billal Tedbirt, Alexis Lefebvre, Nadège Cordel, Marina Alexandre, Manuelle Viguier, Géraldine Jeudy, Michel D'Incan, Sébastien Debarbieux, Alexis Brue, Sophie Duvert-Lehembre, Marion Fenot, Vannina Seta, Saskia Ingen-Housz-Oro, Clémence Lepelletier, Pascal Joly
{"title":"Optimizing Pemphigus Management With Rituximab and Short-Term Relapse Predictors.","authors":"Vivien Hébert, Sami Hamwi, Emmanuelle Tancrède-Bohin, Gaelle Quéreux, Anne Pham-Ledard, Frédéric Caux, Billal Tedbirt, Alexis Lefebvre, Nadège Cordel, Marina Alexandre, Manuelle Viguier, Géraldine Jeudy, Michel D'Incan, Sébastien Debarbieux, Alexis Brue, Sophie Duvert-Lehembre, Marion Fenot, Vannina Seta, Saskia Ingen-Housz-Oro, Clémence Lepelletier, Pascal Joly","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.6130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Rituximab is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe pemphigus. However, 20% of patients in the RITUX 3 trial relapsed within the first year of treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the outcome of an additional rituximab infusion at month 6 in patients with pemphigus who were in complete remission (CR) after rituximab regimen but had 1 or more predictors of relapse at month 3.</p><p><strong>Design, settings, and participants: </strong>This multicenter cohort study was conducted in France from September 2018 to June 2023 to assess patients with newly diagnosed pemphigus who were in CR after treatment with the RITUX 3 regimen but had predictors of relapse at month 3. Relapse factors were a Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) score of 45 or higher, desmoglein 1 (DSG1) antibodies greater than 20 IU/mL, and/or DSG3 antibodies greater than 130 IU/mL.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Patients in CR at month 6 with at least 1 predictor of relapse were treated with an additional rituximab infusion at month 6.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary end point was the rate of CR without corticosteroid therapy for 2 months at month 12. Secondary end points were the rate of relapse, number of patients needing to be re-treated (NNT) with rituximab to avoid a relapse, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population comprised 87 patients (44 females [50.6%] and 43 [49.4%] males), with a mean (SD [range]) age of 55.3 (15.2 [24-92]) years at pemphigus diagnosis. Of these, 64 patients (73.6%) had pemphigus vulgaris and 23 (26.4%) had pemphigus foliaceus. At month 6, CR had been achieved by 77 patients (88.5%), and 10 (11.5%) had persistent disease activity. Of the 77 patients in CR, 30 (39.0%) had at least 1 predictor of relapse and received an additional infusion of rituximab; 47 patients (61.0%) without a predictor did not. Two patients without a predictor and no patients with a predictor experienced relapse-an overall relapse rate of 2.6% and an NNT of 3.6 (95% CI, 1.6-46.5). The 10 patients (11.5%) with persistent disease activity at month 6 were re-treated with rituximab, 1000 mg. At month 12, the rate of CR without corticosteroid therapy for a minimum of 2 months was 72 of 77 (93.5%) among patients who had achieved CR at month 6, and 72 of 87 (82.7%) for the whole study population. Eight serious adverse effects were reported among 5 patients; there were no deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>This multicenter cohort study indicates that using predictors such as baseline PDAI score, anti-DSG1 antibodies, and/or anti-DSG3 antibodies to initiate preemptive treatment with additional rituximab may reduce the rate of short-term relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11800125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.6130","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: Rituximab is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe pemphigus. However, 20% of patients in the RITUX 3 trial relapsed within the first year of treatment.
Objective: To assess the outcome of an additional rituximab infusion at month 6 in patients with pemphigus who were in complete remission (CR) after rituximab regimen but had 1 or more predictors of relapse at month 3.
Design, settings, and participants: This multicenter cohort study was conducted in France from September 2018 to June 2023 to assess patients with newly diagnosed pemphigus who were in CR after treatment with the RITUX 3 regimen but had predictors of relapse at month 3. Relapse factors were a Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) score of 45 or higher, desmoglein 1 (DSG1) antibodies greater than 20 IU/mL, and/or DSG3 antibodies greater than 130 IU/mL.
Exposure: Patients in CR at month 6 with at least 1 predictor of relapse were treated with an additional rituximab infusion at month 6.
Main outcomes and measures: Primary end point was the rate of CR without corticosteroid therapy for 2 months at month 12. Secondary end points were the rate of relapse, number of patients needing to be re-treated (NNT) with rituximab to avoid a relapse, and safety.
Results: The study population comprised 87 patients (44 females [50.6%] and 43 [49.4%] males), with a mean (SD [range]) age of 55.3 (15.2 [24-92]) years at pemphigus diagnosis. Of these, 64 patients (73.6%) had pemphigus vulgaris and 23 (26.4%) had pemphigus foliaceus. At month 6, CR had been achieved by 77 patients (88.5%), and 10 (11.5%) had persistent disease activity. Of the 77 patients in CR, 30 (39.0%) had at least 1 predictor of relapse and received an additional infusion of rituximab; 47 patients (61.0%) without a predictor did not. Two patients without a predictor and no patients with a predictor experienced relapse-an overall relapse rate of 2.6% and an NNT of 3.6 (95% CI, 1.6-46.5). The 10 patients (11.5%) with persistent disease activity at month 6 were re-treated with rituximab, 1000 mg. At month 12, the rate of CR without corticosteroid therapy for a minimum of 2 months was 72 of 77 (93.5%) among patients who had achieved CR at month 6, and 72 of 87 (82.7%) for the whole study population. Eight serious adverse effects were reported among 5 patients; there were no deaths.
Conclusion and relevance: This multicenter cohort study indicates that using predictors such as baseline PDAI score, anti-DSG1 antibodies, and/or anti-DSG3 antibodies to initiate preemptive treatment with additional rituximab may reduce the rate of short-term relapse.
期刊介绍:
JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery.
JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care.
The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists.
JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.