Accuracy of the Heijl-Krakau Method During Blind-spot Stimulation with the Head Mounted Imo Perimeter in Patients with Glaucoma and Glaucoma Suspects.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Mariko Eura, Hiroki Nomoto, Chota Matsumoto, Takuya Ishibashi, Fumi Tanabe, Keiji Yoshikawa, Mami Nanno, Shunji Kusaka
{"title":"Accuracy of the Heijl-Krakau Method During Blind-spot Stimulation with the Head Mounted Imo Perimeter in Patients with Glaucoma and Glaucoma Suspects.","authors":"Mariko Eura, Hiroki Nomoto, Chota Matsumoto, Takuya Ishibashi, Fumi Tanabe, Keiji Yoshikawa, Mami Nanno, Shunji Kusaka","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>13.9% of fixation loss responses by the Heijl-Krakau method were observed even in stable fixation eyes. The Heijl-Krakau method would overestimate the fixation loss responses.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the Heijl-Krakau method by measuring eye positions during blind-spot stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two thousand one hundred fifty-three eyes of 1155 glaucoma and glaucoma-suspect patients. All patients underwent a head-mounted perimeter imo test. The imo has an eye tracking system that records eye position during tests and assists the device with stimulating corrected points corresponding to eye movement. All stimulus presentations were classified into three groups: 1. fixation loss (FL) stimulus: responded to Heijl-Krakau stimuli; 2. non-FL stimulus: did not respond to Heijl-Krakau stimuli; 3. total stimuli: all other stimuli except for Heijl-Krakau stimuli. We compared the amount of fixation displacement between the FL, non-FL, and total stimuli by the Mann-Whitney U test. Relationships between the FL and mean deviation (MD), the FL and age were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median fixation displacements with the FL, non-FL, and total stimuli were 3.2°, 1.4° and 1.5°, respectively. The fixation displacement in the FL stimulus group was greater than that in the non-FL and total stimuli groups (P<0.001). When we defined fixation displacement in the range of less than 1° as \"stable eye fixation\", 13.9% of the stimulus points corresponded to \"stable eye fixation\" with the FL stimulus. No significant relationships were found in the FL and MD, as well as in the FL and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In glaucoma and glaucoma suspected patients, after allowance for eye movement by imo patients still responded to the Heijl-Krakau blind spot monitor on 13.9% of occasions.. Our results suggest that the Heijl-Krakau method overestimates the FL response in glaucoma and glaucoma suspected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prcis: 13.9% of fixation loss responses by the Heijl-Krakau method were observed even in stable fixation eyes. The Heijl-Krakau method would overestimate the fixation loss responses.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the Heijl-Krakau method by measuring eye positions during blind-spot stimulation.

Methods: Two thousand one hundred fifty-three eyes of 1155 glaucoma and glaucoma-suspect patients. All patients underwent a head-mounted perimeter imo test. The imo has an eye tracking system that records eye position during tests and assists the device with stimulating corrected points corresponding to eye movement. All stimulus presentations were classified into three groups: 1. fixation loss (FL) stimulus: responded to Heijl-Krakau stimuli; 2. non-FL stimulus: did not respond to Heijl-Krakau stimuli; 3. total stimuli: all other stimuli except for Heijl-Krakau stimuli. We compared the amount of fixation displacement between the FL, non-FL, and total stimuli by the Mann-Whitney U test. Relationships between the FL and mean deviation (MD), the FL and age were analyzed.

Results: The median fixation displacements with the FL, non-FL, and total stimuli were 3.2°, 1.4° and 1.5°, respectively. The fixation displacement in the FL stimulus group was greater than that in the non-FL and total stimuli groups (P<0.001). When we defined fixation displacement in the range of less than 1° as "stable eye fixation", 13.9% of the stimulus points corresponded to "stable eye fixation" with the FL stimulus. No significant relationships were found in the FL and MD, as well as in the FL and age.

Conclusion: In glaucoma and glaucoma suspected patients, after allowance for eye movement by imo patients still responded to the Heijl-Krakau blind spot monitor on 13.9% of occasions.. Our results suggest that the Heijl-Krakau method overestimates the FL response in glaucoma and glaucoma suspected patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信