Accuracy of the Heijl-Krakau Method During Blind-Spot Stimulation With the Head Mounted Imo Perimeter in Patients With Glaucoma and Glaucoma Suspects.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Glaucoma Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002549
Mariko Eura, Hiroki Nomoto, Chota Matsumoto, Takuya Ishibashi, Fumi Tanabe, Keiji Yoshikawa, Mami Nanno, Shunji Kusaka
{"title":"Accuracy of the Heijl-Krakau Method During Blind-Spot Stimulation With the Head Mounted Imo Perimeter in Patients With Glaucoma and Glaucoma Suspects.","authors":"Mariko Eura, Hiroki Nomoto, Chota Matsumoto, Takuya Ishibashi, Fumi Tanabe, Keiji Yoshikawa, Mami Nanno, Shunji Kusaka","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>13.9% of fixation loss responses by the Heijl-Krakau method were observed even in stable fixation eyes. The Heijl-Krakau method would overestimate the fixation loss responses.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the Heijl-Krakau method by measuring eye positions during blind-spot stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two thousand one hundred fifty-three eyes of 1155 glaucoma and glaucoma-suspect patients. All patients underwent a head-mounted perimeter imo test. The imo has an eye tracking system that records eye position during tests and assists the device with stimulating corrected points corresponding to eye movement. All stimulus presentations were classified into 3 groups: (1) fixation loss (FL) stimulus: responded to Heijl-Krakau stimuli; (2) non-FL stimulus: did not respond to Heijl-Krakau stimuli; and (3) total stimuli: all other stimuli except for Heijl-Krakau stimuli. We compared the amount of fixation displacement between the FL, non-FL, and total stimuli by the Mann-Whitney U test. Relationships between the FL and mean deviation (MD), the FL and age were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median fixation displacements with the FL, non-FL, and total stimuli were 3.2, 1.4, and 1.5 degrees, respectively. The fixation displacement in the FL stimulus group was greater than that in the non-FL and total stimuli groups ( P <0.001). When we defined fixation displacement in the range of <1 degree as \"stable eye fixation,\" 13.9% of the stimulus points corresponded to \"stable eye fixation\" with the FL stimulus. No significant relationships were found in the FL and MD, as well as in the FL and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In glaucoma and glaucoma suspected patients, after allowance for eye movement by imo patients still responded to the Heijl-Krakau blind spot monitor on 13.9% of occasions. Our results suggest that the Heijl-Krakau method overestimates the FL response in glaucoma and glaucoma suspected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":"400-403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prcis: 13.9% of fixation loss responses by the Heijl-Krakau method were observed even in stable fixation eyes. The Heijl-Krakau method would overestimate the fixation loss responses.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the Heijl-Krakau method by measuring eye positions during blind-spot stimulation.

Methods: Two thousand one hundred fifty-three eyes of 1155 glaucoma and glaucoma-suspect patients. All patients underwent a head-mounted perimeter imo test. The imo has an eye tracking system that records eye position during tests and assists the device with stimulating corrected points corresponding to eye movement. All stimulus presentations were classified into 3 groups: (1) fixation loss (FL) stimulus: responded to Heijl-Krakau stimuli; (2) non-FL stimulus: did not respond to Heijl-Krakau stimuli; and (3) total stimuli: all other stimuli except for Heijl-Krakau stimuli. We compared the amount of fixation displacement between the FL, non-FL, and total stimuli by the Mann-Whitney U test. Relationships between the FL and mean deviation (MD), the FL and age were analyzed.

Results: The median fixation displacements with the FL, non-FL, and total stimuli were 3.2, 1.4, and 1.5 degrees, respectively. The fixation displacement in the FL stimulus group was greater than that in the non-FL and total stimuli groups ( P <0.001). When we defined fixation displacement in the range of <1 degree as "stable eye fixation," 13.9% of the stimulus points corresponded to "stable eye fixation" with the FL stimulus. No significant relationships were found in the FL and MD, as well as in the FL and age.

Conclusion: In glaucoma and glaucoma suspected patients, after allowance for eye movement by imo patients still responded to the Heijl-Krakau blind spot monitor on 13.9% of occasions. Our results suggest that the Heijl-Krakau method overestimates the FL response in glaucoma and glaucoma suspected patients.

在青光眼和疑似青光眼患者的头戴式Imo周长刺激盲点时Heijl-Krakau方法的准确性。
实践:即使在稳定的固定眼中,Heijl-Krakau法也观察到13.9%的固定丧失反应。Heijl-Krakau方法会高估注视损失反应。目的:本研究旨在通过测量盲点刺激时眼睛的位置来评估Heijl-Krakau法的准确性。方法:对1155例青光眼及疑似青光眼患者共2153眼进行分析。所有患者都进行了头戴式周边imo测试。imo有一个眼球追踪系统,在测试过程中记录眼球位置,并协助设备刺激与眼球运动相对应的校正点。所有的刺激呈现分为三组:1。固定损失刺激:对Heijl-Krakau刺激有反应;2. 非fl刺激:对Heijl-Krakau刺激无反应;3. 总刺激:除黑-克拉考刺激外的所有其他刺激。我们通过Mann-Whitney U测试比较了FL、非FL和总刺激的固定位移量。分析FL与平均偏差(MD)、FL与年龄的关系。结果:前FL、非前FL和总刺激的中位固定位移分别为3.2°、1.4°和1.5°。结论:在青光眼和疑似青光眼患者中,在允许眼球运动后,仍有13.9%的患者对Heijl-Krakau盲点监测有反应。我们的结果表明,Heijl-Krakau方法高估了青光眼和疑似青光眼患者的FL反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信