De-biasing microbiome sequencing data: bacterial morphology-based correction of extraction bias and correlates of chimera formation.

IF 13.8 1区 生物学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Luise Rauer, Amedeo De Tomassi, Christian L Müller, Claudia Hülpüsch, Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann, Matthias Reiger, Avidan U Neumann
{"title":"De-biasing microbiome sequencing data: bacterial morphology-based correction of extraction bias and correlates of chimera formation.","authors":"Luise Rauer, Amedeo De Tomassi, Christian L Müller, Claudia Hülpüsch, Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann, Matthias Reiger, Avidan U Neumann","doi":"10.1186/s40168-024-01998-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Microbiome amplicon sequencing data are distorted by multiple protocol-dependent biases from bacterial DNA extraction, contamination, sequence errors, and chimeras, hindering clinical microbiome applications. In particular, extraction bias is a major confounder in sequencing-based microbiome analyses, with no correction method available to date. Here, we suggest using mock community controls to computationally correct extraction bias based on bacterial morphological properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared dilution series of 3 cell mock communities with an even or staggered composition. DNA of these mock, and additional skin microbiome samples, was extracted with 8 different extraction protocols (2 buffers, 2 extraction kits, 2 lysis conditions). Extracted DNA was sequenced (V1-V3 16S rRNA gene) together with corresponding DNA mocks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Microbiome composition was significantly different between extraction kits and lysis conditions, but not between buffers. Independent of the extraction protocol, chimera formation increased with higher input cell numbers. Contaminants originated mostly from buffers, and considerable cross-contamination was observed in low-input samples. Comparing the microbiome composition of the cell mocks to corresponding DNA mocks revealed taxon-specific protocol-dependent extraction bias. Strikingly, this extraction bias per species was predictable by bacterial cell morphology. Morphology-based computational correction of extraction bias significantly improved resulting microbial compositions when applied to different mock samples, even with different taxa. Equivalent correction of the skin samples showed a substantial impact on microbiome compositions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicate that higher DNA density increases chimera formation during PCR amplification. Furthermore, we show that computational correction of extraction bias based on bacterial cell morphology would be feasible using appropriate positive controls, thus constituting an important step toward overcoming protocol biases in microbiome analysis. Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":18447,"journal":{"name":"Microbiome","volume":"13 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":13.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792448/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-024-01998-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Microbiome amplicon sequencing data are distorted by multiple protocol-dependent biases from bacterial DNA extraction, contamination, sequence errors, and chimeras, hindering clinical microbiome applications. In particular, extraction bias is a major confounder in sequencing-based microbiome analyses, with no correction method available to date. Here, we suggest using mock community controls to computationally correct extraction bias based on bacterial morphological properties.

Methods: We compared dilution series of 3 cell mock communities with an even or staggered composition. DNA of these mock, and additional skin microbiome samples, was extracted with 8 different extraction protocols (2 buffers, 2 extraction kits, 2 lysis conditions). Extracted DNA was sequenced (V1-V3 16S rRNA gene) together with corresponding DNA mocks.

Results: Microbiome composition was significantly different between extraction kits and lysis conditions, but not between buffers. Independent of the extraction protocol, chimera formation increased with higher input cell numbers. Contaminants originated mostly from buffers, and considerable cross-contamination was observed in low-input samples. Comparing the microbiome composition of the cell mocks to corresponding DNA mocks revealed taxon-specific protocol-dependent extraction bias. Strikingly, this extraction bias per species was predictable by bacterial cell morphology. Morphology-based computational correction of extraction bias significantly improved resulting microbial compositions when applied to different mock samples, even with different taxa. Equivalent correction of the skin samples showed a substantial impact on microbiome compositions.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that higher DNA density increases chimera formation during PCR amplification. Furthermore, we show that computational correction of extraction bias based on bacterial cell morphology would be feasible using appropriate positive controls, thus constituting an important step toward overcoming protocol biases in microbiome analysis. Video Abstract.

去除微生物组测序数据的偏差:基于细菌形态的提取偏差校正和嵌合体形成的相关因素。
微生物组扩增子测序数据由于细菌DNA提取、污染、序列错误和嵌合体等多种方案相关偏差而失真,阻碍了微生物组的临床应用。特别是,在基于测序的微生物组分析中,提取偏差是一个主要的混杂因素,迄今为止还没有可用的校正方法。在这里,我们建议使用模拟群落控制来计算纠正基于细菌形态特性的提取偏差。方法:我们比较了3个细胞模拟群落均匀或交错组成的稀释系列。用8种不同的提取方案(2种缓冲液,2种提取试剂盒,2种裂解条件)提取这些模拟物和其他皮肤微生物组样本的DNA。对提取的DNA (V1-V3 16S rRNA基因)进行测序,并制作相应的DNA模拟物。结果:微生物组组成在不同提取试剂盒和不同裂解条件下有显著差异,但在不同缓冲液之间无显著差异。与提取方案无关,嵌合体的形成随着输入细胞数量的增加而增加。污染物主要来自缓冲液,在低输入样本中观察到相当大的交叉污染。将细胞模拟物的微生物组组成与相应的DNA模拟物进行比较,揭示了分类单元特定协议依赖的提取偏差。引人注目的是,每个物种的提取偏差是可以通过细菌细胞形态来预测的。当应用于不同的模拟样品,甚至不同的分类群时,基于形态的提取偏差计算校正显着改善了所得微生物组成。皮肤样品的等效校正显示对微生物组组成有实质性影响。结论:我们的结果表明,在PCR扩增过程中,更高的DNA密度增加了嵌合体的形成。此外,我们表明,使用适当的阳性对照,基于细菌细胞形态的提取偏差的计算校正是可行的,从而构成了克服微生物组分析方案偏差的重要一步。视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbiome
Microbiome MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
198
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Microbiome is a journal that focuses on studies of microbiomes in humans, animals, plants, and the environment. It covers both natural and manipulated microbiomes, such as those in agriculture. The journal is interested in research that uses meta-omics approaches or novel bioinformatics tools and emphasizes the community/host interaction and structure-function relationship within the microbiome. Studies that go beyond descriptive omics surveys and include experimental or theoretical approaches will be considered for publication. The journal also encourages research that establishes cause and effect relationships and supports proposed microbiome functions. However, studies of individual microbial isolates/species without exploring their impact on the host or the complex microbiome structures and functions will not be considered for publication. Microbiome is indexed in BIOSIS, Current Contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citations Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信