A comparative analysis of gallstones from gallbladder cancer patients and cholelithiasis patients unveiling the association between gallstones and gallbladder cancer.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Bhavna Sharma, Ratnakar Shukla, Anand Nagar, Nishith Ekka, Vinay Kumar Kapoor, Anu Behari, Shubha Rani Sharma
{"title":"A comparative analysis of gallstones from gallbladder cancer patients and cholelithiasis patients unveiling the association between gallstones and gallbladder cancer.","authors":"Bhavna Sharma, Ratnakar Shukla, Anand Nagar, Nishith Ekka, Vinay Kumar Kapoor, Anu Behari, Shubha Rani Sharma","doi":"10.1007/s12032-025-02614-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gallstones (GS) are one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases. Till date medical cure for gallstones is not available. Unlike kidney stones, GS need cholecystectomy, i.e. surgical removal of the gallbladder (GB). GS are asymptomatic in most of the cases. They are the cause of GB inflammation that is chronic cholecystitis. GS have been supposed to be an important risk factor for causing gallbladder cancer (GBC). But the exact relationship between GS and GBC is not clear till date. In this study, we have compared the gallstones from cholelithiasis patients with those from patients with GBC. The size, volume and weight of these GS were comparatively analyzed. We have performed compositional as well as heavy metal analysis of the GS for both groups of patients by FTIR, FESEM and ICP-MS. The size and volume of gallstones from GBC patients was found to be on the higher side. We found that the GS from GBC patients were only of cholesterol type while those from cholelithiasis patients were mixed and pigment type. Heavy metals such as As, Pb, Fe were detected in higher concentration in GS from GBC patients. Thus, heavy metals detected in the gallstones could be regarded as the contributing factors to GBC. Further the mechanism of initiation of cancer by heavy metals in presence of cholesterol GS needs to be studied, so that novel strategies can be developed for the prevention of GBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":18433,"journal":{"name":"Medical Oncology","volume":"42 3","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-025-02614-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gallstones (GS) are one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases. Till date medical cure for gallstones is not available. Unlike kidney stones, GS need cholecystectomy, i.e. surgical removal of the gallbladder (GB). GS are asymptomatic in most of the cases. They are the cause of GB inflammation that is chronic cholecystitis. GS have been supposed to be an important risk factor for causing gallbladder cancer (GBC). But the exact relationship between GS and GBC is not clear till date. In this study, we have compared the gallstones from cholelithiasis patients with those from patients with GBC. The size, volume and weight of these GS were comparatively analyzed. We have performed compositional as well as heavy metal analysis of the GS for both groups of patients by FTIR, FESEM and ICP-MS. The size and volume of gallstones from GBC patients was found to be on the higher side. We found that the GS from GBC patients were only of cholesterol type while those from cholelithiasis patients were mixed and pigment type. Heavy metals such as As, Pb, Fe were detected in higher concentration in GS from GBC patients. Thus, heavy metals detected in the gallstones could be regarded as the contributing factors to GBC. Further the mechanism of initiation of cancer by heavy metals in presence of cholesterol GS needs to be studied, so that novel strategies can be developed for the prevention of GBC.

胆囊癌患者与胆石症患者胆结石的比较分析揭示了胆结石与胆囊癌的关系。
胆结石是最常见的胃肠道疾病之一。迄今为止,胆结石还没有医学上的治疗方法。与肾结石不同,GS需要胆囊切除术,即手术切除胆囊(GB)。大多数情况下,GS是无症状的。它们是GB炎症的原因,即慢性胆囊炎。GS被认为是导致胆囊癌(GBC)的重要危险因素。但GS和GBC之间的确切关系至今尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们比较了胆石症患者和GBC患者的胆结石。对这些GS的尺寸、体积和重量进行了比较分析。我们通过FTIR, FESEM和ICP-MS对两组患者的GS进行了成分和重金属分析。GBC患者胆结石的大小和体积均偏大。我们发现GBC患者的GS仅为胆固醇型,而胆石症患者的GS为混合型和色素型。GBC患者GS中重金属as、Pb、Fe含量较高。因此,胆结石中检测到的重金属可视为GBC的促成因素。在胆固醇GS存在的情况下,需要进一步研究重金属引发癌症的机制,从而开发新的策略来预防GBC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Oncology
Medical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
259
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Medical Oncology (MO) communicates the results of clinical and experimental research in oncology and hematology, particularly experimental therapeutics within the fields of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. It also provides state-of-the-art reviews on clinical and experimental therapies. Topics covered include immunobiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of malignant tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信