Verena Kantenwein, Elisabeth Martini, Bernhard Haller, Marta Telishevska, Felix Bourier, Tilko Reents, Marc Kottmaier, Sarah Lengauer, Isabel Deisenhofer, Christof Kolb
{"title":"Long-term outcome after ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with postprocedurally unmasked sinus node disease.","authors":"Verena Kantenwein, Elisabeth Martini, Bernhard Haller, Marta Telishevska, Felix Bourier, Tilko Reents, Marc Kottmaier, Sarah Lengauer, Isabel Deisenhofer, Christof Kolb","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-01998-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>About three percent of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) additionally suffer from a concealed sinus node disease (SND). We sought to determine the success of ablation one year after ablation of persistent AF in patients with postprocedurally unmasked SND.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In total, 2539 patients with an ablation of persistent AF at our centre were screened for a postprocedurally unmasked SND, which made acute cardiac pacing necessary within one week after ablation. In a propensity score-matched case-control study (1:2 matching), the long-term ablation success of 51 patients (mean age 73 ± 8 years, 59% male) with unmasked SND after ablation of persistent AF was compared to that of 102 patients without SND after ablation of persistent AF. Controls were matched to cases based on the propensity score considering age, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, gender, blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, atrial low voltage, previous number of ablations, and method of ablation. One year after ablation of persistent AF, 20 (39%) patients with postprocedurally unmasked SND and 61 (60%) patients without postprocedurally unmasked SND were in sinus rhythm (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.90, p = 0.017). The number of repeat ablation procedures within the follow-up year did not differ significantly between cases and controls (mean 0.60 ± 0.68 vs 0.53 ± 0.80, rate ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.78, p = 0.566).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with a postprocedurally unmasked SND after ablation of persistent AF, long-term ablation success seems to be worse compared to patients without postprocedurally unmasked SND.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"985-993"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-01998-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: About three percent of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) additionally suffer from a concealed sinus node disease (SND). We sought to determine the success of ablation one year after ablation of persistent AF in patients with postprocedurally unmasked SND.
Methods and results: In total, 2539 patients with an ablation of persistent AF at our centre were screened for a postprocedurally unmasked SND, which made acute cardiac pacing necessary within one week after ablation. In a propensity score-matched case-control study (1:2 matching), the long-term ablation success of 51 patients (mean age 73 ± 8 years, 59% male) with unmasked SND after ablation of persistent AF was compared to that of 102 patients without SND after ablation of persistent AF. Controls were matched to cases based on the propensity score considering age, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, gender, blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, atrial low voltage, previous number of ablations, and method of ablation. One year after ablation of persistent AF, 20 (39%) patients with postprocedurally unmasked SND and 61 (60%) patients without postprocedurally unmasked SND were in sinus rhythm (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.90, p = 0.017). The number of repeat ablation procedures within the follow-up year did not differ significantly between cases and controls (mean 0.60 ± 0.68 vs 0.53 ± 0.80, rate ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.78, p = 0.566).
Conclusion: In patients with a postprocedurally unmasked SND after ablation of persistent AF, long-term ablation success seems to be worse compared to patients without postprocedurally unmasked SND.
背景:大约3%的持续性心房颤动(AF)患者还伴有隐蔽性窦房结疾病(SND)。我们试图确定手术后未隐匿SND的持续性房颤患者在消融一年后的消融成功率。方法和结果:在我们的中心,总共有2539例持续性房颤消融患者接受了术后SND筛查,这使得消融后一周内需要进行急性心脏起搏。在一项倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究中(1:2匹配),将51例(平均年龄73±8岁,59%男性)顽固性房颤消融后未隐匿SND患者与102例顽固性房颤消融后未隐匿SND患者的长期消融成功率进行比较。对照根据倾向评分,考虑年龄、体重指数、左心室射血分数、性别、血压、糖尿病、心房低压、既往消融次数及消融方法。顽固性房颤消融一年后,20例(39%)术后无隐匿性SND患者和61例(60%)术后无隐匿性SND患者处于窦性心律(OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22 ~ 0.90, p = 0.017)。随访一年内重复消融次数在病例和对照组之间无显著差异(平均0.60±0.68 vs 0.53±0.80,比率比1.14,95% CI 0.72 ~ 1.78, p = 0.566)。结论:在持续性房颤消融后出现隐匿性SND的患者中,与没有隐匿性SND的患者相比,长期消融的成功率似乎更低。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.