Appendicolith as a sign of complicated appendicitis - a myth or reality? A retrospective study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Ceith Nikkolo, Mariliis Muuli, Ülle Kirsimägi, Urmas Lepner
{"title":"Appendicolith as a sign of complicated appendicitis - a myth or reality? A retrospective study.","authors":"Ceith Nikkolo, Mariliis Muuli, Ülle Kirsimägi, Urmas Lepner","doi":"10.1159/000543683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Appendicolith can be incidentally detected on abdominal computer tomography (CT) without any signs of appendicitis. However, it has also been found to be a risk factor for failure of nonoperative management in acute appendicitis. The present retrospective study aimed to evaluate whether appendicolith predicts complicated appendicitis in patients with any appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients undergoing appendectomy from January 2016 to December 2018. Appendicolith was considered to be present when it was described in a CT scan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 267 patients, appendicolith was found in 120 cases, while there were no in 147 cases in preoperative CT scans. In the case of complicated appendicitis (gangrenous or gangrenous perforated appendicitis), appendicolith was visible in CT scans in 57.7% of the patients. Of the patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, 38.3% had appendicolith in CT scan (p=0.002). In univariate logistic regression analysis, based on the finding of the histological specimen, appendicolith was associated with complicated appendicitis (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.28-3.51 p=0.004). When adjusting for sex, age group (age ≤50 vs >50 years), and duration of symptoms (≤24 vs >24 hours), the odds ratio was 3.52 (95% CI 1.88-6.58; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that appendicolith can be considered an independent risk factor for complicated appendicitis. Therefore, in the presence of appendicolith, surgical treatment should probably be preferred over non-surgical treatment in acute appendicitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12222,"journal":{"name":"European Surgical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543683","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Appendicolith can be incidentally detected on abdominal computer tomography (CT) without any signs of appendicitis. However, it has also been found to be a risk factor for failure of nonoperative management in acute appendicitis. The present retrospective study aimed to evaluate whether appendicolith predicts complicated appendicitis in patients with any appendicitis.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients undergoing appendectomy from January 2016 to December 2018. Appendicolith was considered to be present when it was described in a CT scan.

Results: Of the 267 patients, appendicolith was found in 120 cases, while there were no in 147 cases in preoperative CT scans. In the case of complicated appendicitis (gangrenous or gangrenous perforated appendicitis), appendicolith was visible in CT scans in 57.7% of the patients. Of the patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, 38.3% had appendicolith in CT scan (p=0.002). In univariate logistic regression analysis, based on the finding of the histological specimen, appendicolith was associated with complicated appendicitis (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.28-3.51 p=0.004). When adjusting for sex, age group (age ≤50 vs >50 years), and duration of symptoms (≤24 vs >24 hours), the odds ratio was 3.52 (95% CI 1.88-6.58; p<0.001).

Conclusions: Our study found that appendicolith can be considered an independent risk factor for complicated appendicitis. Therefore, in the presence of appendicolith, surgical treatment should probably be preferred over non-surgical treatment in acute appendicitis.

阑尾结石是复杂性阑尾炎的征兆--神话还是现实?一项回顾性研究。
简介阑尾结石可在没有任何阑尾炎症状的情况下通过腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)偶然发现。然而,它也被发现是急性阑尾炎非手术治疗失败的一个风险因素。本回顾性研究旨在评估阑尾结石是否能预测任何阑尾炎患者的复杂性阑尾炎:对2016年1月至2018年12月接受阑尾切除术的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。当 CT 扫描中描述阑尾结石时,即认为存在阑尾结石:在 267 例患者中,120 例发现阑尾结石,147 例在术前 CT 扫描中未发现阑尾结石。在复杂性阑尾炎(坏疽性阑尾炎或坏疽性穿孔性阑尾炎)病例中,57.7%的患者在 CT 扫描中可见阑尾结石。在非复杂性阑尾炎患者中,38.3%的患者在 CT 扫描中发现阑尾结石(P=0.002)。在单变量逻辑回归分析中,根据组织学标本的发现,阑尾结石与复杂性阑尾炎相关(OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.28-3.51 p=0.004)。当调整性别、年龄组(年龄≤50岁 vs >50岁)和症状持续时间(≤24小时 vs >24小时)后,几率比为3.52(95% CI 1.88-6.58; p结论:我们的研究发现,阑尾结石可被视为复杂性阑尾炎的独立风险因素。因此,在急性阑尾炎患者中,如果存在阑尾结石,手术治疗可能优于非手术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Surgical Research'' features original clinical and experimental papers, condensed reviews of new knowledge relevant to surgical research, and short technical notes serving the information needs of investigators in various fields of operative medicine. Coverage includes surgery, surgical pathophysiology, drug usage, and new surgical techniques. Special consideration is given to information on the use of animal models, physiological and biological methods as well as biophysical measuring and recording systems. The journal is of particular value for workers interested in pathophysiologic concepts, new techniques and in how these can be introduced into clinical work or applied when critical decisions are made concerning the use of new procedures or drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信