Valve Thrombosis and Antithrombotic Therapy After Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

Abstract

Aims: Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has become a feasible alternative to surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) in selected patients at high surgical risk. The risk of valve thrombosis following SMVR and TMVR, and the optimal antithrombotic therapy following these procedures, remains uncertain. We aimed to compare the incidence of bioprosthetic mitral valve thrombosis (bMVT) after SMVR and TMVR, and the incidence of bMVT between patients on different antithrombotic regimens.

Methods and results: A literature search of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library was performed between January 2000 and August 2024. Random-effects models were used to derive pooled estimates of the incidence of bMVT in the absence of prior or active endocarditis and valve thrombosis. 47 studies (6170 patients, total follow-up 9541.8 patient-years) were eligible for inclusion. The overall incidence of bMVT was 5.05 (95%CI 3.18-8.01, I2 = 82%) per 100-patient-years. Subclinical bMVT was more common than clinically significant bMVT: incidence 19.11 vs 7.91 per 100-patient-years, adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 4.62 (95%CI 1.39-15.36), p = 0.012. bMVT was numerically more common after TMVR than SMVR, but the comparison was not statistically significant: incidence 7.03 vs 0.58 per 100-patient-years, aIRR 2.19 (95%CI 0.72-6.72), p = 0.170. Patients on vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) had a lower incidence of bMVT than patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC; incidence 5.72 vs 17.08, aIRR 0.31, 95%CI 0.13-0.73, p = 0.007).

Conclusions: bMVT is not uncommon, with numerically higher incidence in transcatheter compared to surgical valves, but the comparison was not statistically significant. VKAs are associated with a lower incidence of bMVT compared to DOACs.