Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) of Extraperitoneal Abdominal Disease, is it Appropriate?

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16866-6
Christopher W Mangieri, Konstantinos I Votanopoulos, Perry Shen, Edward A Levine
{"title":"Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) of Extraperitoneal Abdominal Disease, is it Appropriate?","authors":"Christopher W Mangieri, Konstantinos I Votanopoulos, Perry Shen, Edward A Levine","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-16866-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cytoreductive surgery-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) candidates often have extraperitoneal abdominal disease. Current expert peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) guidelines recommend that the presence of extraperitoneal disease is a contraindication to CRS-HIPEC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional appendiceal and colorectal CRS-HIPEC registries. Two study cohorts were constructed: (1) cytoreduction with extraperitoneal abdominal disease, and (2) cytoreductions limited to peritoneal structures alone. The primary study outcome was survival. Subgroup analysis was based on the primary tumor and completeness of cytoreduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 864 CRS-HIPEC cases were evaluated, consisting of 578 appendiceal primaries and 286 colorectal cancers. The extraperitoneal cohort included 101 patients, with 763 patients in the non-extraperitoneal group. The median follow-up time was 13.18 years. The main analysis showed no significant differences in survival times. For overall survival (OS) there was a mean OS time of 5.87 years and a median OS time of 4.43 years for extraperitoneal cytoreductions compared with a mean of 5.90 years and a median of 4.76 years for non-extraperitoneal cytoreductions (p = 0.955). Five-year OS rates did not differ at 49.1% versus 49.5% (odds ratio [OR] 1.036, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.671-1.597, p = 0.874). Disease-free survival (DFS) times showed a mean of 4.40 years and a median of 1.93 years for extraperitoneal cases versus a mean of 5.44 years and a median of 3.05 years for non-extraperitoneal cases (p = 0.210). Five-year DFS rates also showed no differences (OR 0.894, 95% CI 0.476-1.681, p = 0.728). No significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS)Pp times (p = 0.061) were reported. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that extraperitoneal CRS was not an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.281, 95% CI 0.885-1.854, p = 0.190), DFS (HR 1.087, 95% CI 0.694-1.701, p = 0.716), or PFS (HR 0.650, 95% CI 0.243-1.738).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conducted the largest analysis evaluating extraperitoneal cytoreductions, with no significant differences in almost all survival outcomes. We propose that the presence of extraperitoneal abdominal disease is not a contraindication to proceeding with CRS-HIPEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2893-2902"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16866-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cytoreductive surgery-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) candidates often have extraperitoneal abdominal disease. Current expert peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) guidelines recommend that the presence of extraperitoneal disease is a contraindication to CRS-HIPEC.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional appendiceal and colorectal CRS-HIPEC registries. Two study cohorts were constructed: (1) cytoreduction with extraperitoneal abdominal disease, and (2) cytoreductions limited to peritoneal structures alone. The primary study outcome was survival. Subgroup analysis was based on the primary tumor and completeness of cytoreduction.

Results: Overall, 864 CRS-HIPEC cases were evaluated, consisting of 578 appendiceal primaries and 286 colorectal cancers. The extraperitoneal cohort included 101 patients, with 763 patients in the non-extraperitoneal group. The median follow-up time was 13.18 years. The main analysis showed no significant differences in survival times. For overall survival (OS) there was a mean OS time of 5.87 years and a median OS time of 4.43 years for extraperitoneal cytoreductions compared with a mean of 5.90 years and a median of 4.76 years for non-extraperitoneal cytoreductions (p = 0.955). Five-year OS rates did not differ at 49.1% versus 49.5% (odds ratio [OR] 1.036, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.671-1.597, p = 0.874). Disease-free survival (DFS) times showed a mean of 4.40 years and a median of 1.93 years for extraperitoneal cases versus a mean of 5.44 years and a median of 3.05 years for non-extraperitoneal cases (p = 0.210). Five-year DFS rates also showed no differences (OR 0.894, 95% CI 0.476-1.681, p = 0.728). No significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS)Pp times (p = 0.061) were reported. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that extraperitoneal CRS was not an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.281, 95% CI 0.885-1.854, p = 0.190), DFS (HR 1.087, 95% CI 0.694-1.701, p = 0.716), or PFS (HR 0.650, 95% CI 0.243-1.738).

Conclusion: We conducted the largest analysis evaluating extraperitoneal cytoreductions, with no significant differences in almost all survival outcomes. We propose that the presence of extraperitoneal abdominal disease is not a contraindication to proceeding with CRS-HIPEC.

导言:细胞减毒手术-腹腔内热化疗(CRS-HIPEC)的候选者通常有腹膜外腹腔疾病。目前的腹膜表面恶性肿瘤(PSM)专家指南建议,腹膜外疾病是 CRS-HIPEC 的禁忌症:我们对本机构的阑尾和结直肠 CRS-HIPEC 登记进行了回顾性审查。我们构建了两个研究队列:(1)腹膜外腹腔疾病的细胞减灭术;(2)仅限于腹膜结构的细胞减灭术。主要研究结果为存活率。根据原发肿瘤和细胞减灭术的完整性进行分组分析:总共评估了864例CRS-HIPEC病例,其中包括578例阑尾原发癌和286例结直肠癌。腹膜外组包括101名患者,非腹膜外组包括763名患者。中位随访时间为 13.18 年。主要分析结果显示,生存时间没有明显差异。就总生存期(OS)而言,腹膜外细胞剥脱术的平均OS时间为5.87年,中位OS时间为4.43年,而非腹膜外细胞剥脱术的平均OS时间为5.90年,中位OS时间为4.76年(P = 0.955)。五年OS率为49.1%与49.5%,两者没有差异(几率比[OR]1.036,95%置信区间[CI]0.671-1.597,P = 0.874)。无病生存(DFS)时间显示,腹膜外病例平均为 4.40 年,中位数为 1.93 年,而非腹膜外病例平均为 5.44 年,中位数为 3.05 年(P = 0.210)。五年无进展生存率也无差异(OR 0.894,95% CI 0.476-1.681,p = 0.728)。无进展生存期(PFS)Pp 时间无明显差异(p = 0.061)。多变量 Cox 回归分析表明,腹膜外 CRS 不是 OS(危险比 [HR] 1.281,95% CI 0.885-1.854,p = 0.190)、DFS(HR 1.087,95% CI 0.694-1.701,p = 0.716)或 PFS(HR 0.650,95% CI 0.243-1.738)的独立预测因素:我们进行了最大规模的腹膜外细胞减灭术评估分析,几乎所有生存结果都没有显著差异。我们认为,腹膜外疾病并不是进行CRS-HIPEC的禁忌症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信