PyViscount: Validating False Discovery Rate Estimation Methods via Random Search Space Partition.

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Dominik Madej, Henry Lam
{"title":"PyViscount: Validating False Discovery Rate Estimation Methods via Random Search Space Partition.","authors":"Dominik Madej, Henry Lam","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Validating false discovery rate (FDR) estimation is an essential but surprisingly understudied aspect of method development in shotgun proteomics. Currently available validation protocols mostly rely on ground truth data sets, which typically involve manipulating the properties of the search space or query spectra used. As a result, comparing estimated FDR and ground truth-based false discovery proportion values may not be representative of the scenarios involving natural data sets encountered in practice. In this study, we introduce PyViscount─a Python tool implementing a novel validation protocol based on random search space partition, which enables generating a quasi ground-truth using unaltered search spaces of unique candidate peptides and generic data sets of experimental query spectra. Furthermore, validation of existing FDR estimation methods by PyViscount is consistent with alternative validation protocols. The presented novel approach to validation free from the need for synthetic data sets or dubious manipulation of the data may be an attractive alternative for proteomics practitioners, allowing them to obtain deeper insights into the performance of existing and new FDR estimation methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Validating false discovery rate (FDR) estimation is an essential but surprisingly understudied aspect of method development in shotgun proteomics. Currently available validation protocols mostly rely on ground truth data sets, which typically involve manipulating the properties of the search space or query spectra used. As a result, comparing estimated FDR and ground truth-based false discovery proportion values may not be representative of the scenarios involving natural data sets encountered in practice. In this study, we introduce PyViscount─a Python tool implementing a novel validation protocol based on random search space partition, which enables generating a quasi ground-truth using unaltered search spaces of unique candidate peptides and generic data sets of experimental query spectra. Furthermore, validation of existing FDR estimation methods by PyViscount is consistent with alternative validation protocols. The presented novel approach to validation free from the need for synthetic data sets or dubious manipulation of the data may be an attractive alternative for proteomics practitioners, allowing them to obtain deeper insights into the performance of existing and new FDR estimation methods.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信