Comparison of Different Membranes for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapies: An In Vitro Study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Benjamin Malard, Michael Hulko, Julia Koch, Rose Speidel, Dominique Pouchoulin, Jorge Echeverri, Lenar Yessayan
{"title":"Comparison of Different Membranes for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapies: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Benjamin Malard, Michael Hulko, Julia Koch, Rose Speidel, Dominique Pouchoulin, Jorge Echeverri, Lenar Yessayan","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inflammatory mediators play a major role in the development and progression of acute kidney injury (AKI). Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) removes these mediators from the blood using AN69-M, AN69-ST, and HF1400 filters to target low and middle-molecular weight molecules. We characterized the in vitro removal performance of each filter in a 72 hour simulated CRRT procedure. Urea clearance with AN69-M and AN69-ST remained stable (52.4 and 51.2 ml/minute, respectively) but decreased with HF1400 (47.0 ml/minute; p < 0.001). Vancomycin clearance remained stable for AN69 filters but decreased for HF1400. Interleukin (IL)-8 was removed primarily via adsorption with the AN69 filters (92.2 and 91.2 ml/minute for AN69-M and AN69-ST, respectively), but clearance was significantly lower with HF1400 (8.4 ml/minute). Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α clearance was higher with AN69-ST compared with AN69-M or HF1400 (10.3, 1.8, and 2.3 ml/minute, respectively). β2-microglobulin clearance was higher with both AN69-based filters. The hydrogel water repartition of AN69 filters was different, with a higher percentage of bound water in AN69-ST versus AN69-M (30.5% ± 0.2% and 19.3% ± 1.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). These results suggest that clearance profiles of CRRT filters differ according to their properties; further investigation is needed to translate this into clinical improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002387","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inflammatory mediators play a major role in the development and progression of acute kidney injury (AKI). Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) removes these mediators from the blood using AN69-M, AN69-ST, and HF1400 filters to target low and middle-molecular weight molecules. We characterized the in vitro removal performance of each filter in a 72 hour simulated CRRT procedure. Urea clearance with AN69-M and AN69-ST remained stable (52.4 and 51.2 ml/minute, respectively) but decreased with HF1400 (47.0 ml/minute; p < 0.001). Vancomycin clearance remained stable for AN69 filters but decreased for HF1400. Interleukin (IL)-8 was removed primarily via adsorption with the AN69 filters (92.2 and 91.2 ml/minute for AN69-M and AN69-ST, respectively), but clearance was significantly lower with HF1400 (8.4 ml/minute). Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α clearance was higher with AN69-ST compared with AN69-M or HF1400 (10.3, 1.8, and 2.3 ml/minute, respectively). β2-microglobulin clearance was higher with both AN69-based filters. The hydrogel water repartition of AN69 filters was different, with a higher percentage of bound water in AN69-ST versus AN69-M (30.5% ± 0.2% and 19.3% ± 1.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). These results suggest that clearance profiles of CRRT filters differ according to their properties; further investigation is needed to translate this into clinical improvements.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信