Antifungal Efficacy of Ganoderma lucidum and Clotrimazole for Treatment of Denture Stomatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Q3 Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-12-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18502/fid.v21i45.17178
Fahimeh Pakravan, Afsaneh Yegdaneh, Somayeh Taymouri, Shiva Rahimi, Negin Ghahremani
{"title":"Antifungal Efficacy of Ganoderma lucidum and Clotrimazole for Treatment of Denture Stomatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Fahimeh Pakravan, Afsaneh Yegdaneh, Somayeh Taymouri, Shiva Rahimi, Negin Ghahremani","doi":"10.18502/fid.v21i45.17178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to compare the antifungal efficacy of <i>Ganoderma lucidum</i> (<i>G. lucidum</i>) and clotrimazole for treatment of denture stomatitis (DS). <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 50 patients with DS types I and II assigned to two groups (N=25). In the first group, <i>G. lucidum</i> extract was administered in the form of 5% gel while 1% clotrimazole gel was prescribed for the second group. Pain intensity according to the visual analog scale (VAS), and the percentage of DS recovery based on the Budtz-Jorgenson index were evaluated and recorded after 7 and 14 days. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test, independent samples t-test, repeated measures ANOVA, and logistic regression (alpha=0.05). <b>Results:</b> The percentage of complete recovery on day 7 in the <i>G. lucidum</i> group (28%) was higher than that in the clotrimazole group (16%) but not significantly (P=0.592). Not wearing dentures overnight significantly increased the odds of recovery by 6.56 times, while the odds of recovery decreased by 0.03 times in DS type II, as compared to DS type I (P= 0.009). <b>Conclusion:</b> No significant difference existed between the antifungal efficacy of <i>G. lucidum</i> and clotrimazole for clinical treatment of DS. Thus, Ganoderma may be regarded as an alternative treatment, especially in patients' resistant to azoles. Nonetheless, further clinical studies are required to shed more light on this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":12445,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dentistry","volume":"21 ","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v21i45.17178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the antifungal efficacy of Ganoderma lucidum (G. lucidum) and clotrimazole for treatment of denture stomatitis (DS). Materials and Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 50 patients with DS types I and II assigned to two groups (N=25). In the first group, G. lucidum extract was administered in the form of 5% gel while 1% clotrimazole gel was prescribed for the second group. Pain intensity according to the visual analog scale (VAS), and the percentage of DS recovery based on the Budtz-Jorgenson index were evaluated and recorded after 7 and 14 days. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test, independent samples t-test, repeated measures ANOVA, and logistic regression (alpha=0.05). Results: The percentage of complete recovery on day 7 in the G. lucidum group (28%) was higher than that in the clotrimazole group (16%) but not significantly (P=0.592). Not wearing dentures overnight significantly increased the odds of recovery by 6.56 times, while the odds of recovery decreased by 0.03 times in DS type II, as compared to DS type I (P= 0.009). Conclusion: No significant difference existed between the antifungal efficacy of G. lucidum and clotrimazole for clinical treatment of DS. Thus, Ganoderma may be regarded as an alternative treatment, especially in patients' resistant to azoles. Nonetheless, further clinical studies are required to shed more light on this topic.

灵芝联合克霉唑治疗义齿口炎的随机临床研究。
目的:比较灵芝与克霉唑治疗义齿性口炎(DS)的抗真菌效果。材料与方法:本双盲随机临床试验将50例1型和2型DS患者分为两组(N=25)。第一组以5%凝胶形式给予灵芝提取物,第二组以1%克霉唑凝胶形式给予。分别于第7天和第14天以视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛强度,以Budtz-Jorgenson指数(Budtz-Jorgenson index)评估DS恢复百分比。数据分析采用卡方检验、独立样本t检验、重复测量方差分析和logistic回归(α =0.05)。结果:灵芝组第7天完全恢复率(28%)高于克霉唑组(16%),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.592)。不佩戴假牙过夜明显增加了6.56倍的康复几率,而II型DS患者的康复几率比I型DS患者降低了0.03倍(P= 0.009)。结论:灵芝与克霉唑在DS临床治疗中的抗真菌效果无显著差异。因此,灵芝可被视为一种替代治疗,特别是对唑类药物耐药的患者。尽管如此,需要进一步的临床研究来阐明这一主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Dentistry-General Dentistry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信