Investigations on structural-sized GLT beams reinforced with steel and FRP composite bars: experimental tests and nonlinear numerical approach

IF 4.4 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Agnieszka Wdowiak-Postulak, Bartosz Kawecki
{"title":"Investigations on structural-sized GLT beams reinforced with steel and FRP composite bars: experimental tests and nonlinear numerical approach","authors":"Agnieszka Wdowiak-Postulak,&nbsp;Bartosz Kawecki","doi":"10.1007/s43452-025-01123-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper presents experimental and numerical investigations on structural-sized glued laminated timber beams made of coniferous wood with different reinforcing bars configurations (steel, BFRP and GFRP). Thirty-nine specimens were analysed in a four-point bending testing scheme. The highest improvements in stiffness (23.9% and 38.9%) and ultimate load-carrying capacity (13.6% and 29.4%) were observed for beams reinforced with steel bars. However, plasticisation in the steel occurred before wood failure. Beams reinforced with BFRP bars showed intermediate improvements in stiffness (8.2%, 14.2%) and ultimate load (9.6%, 17.5%), followed by those with GFRP bars (5.1% and 9.0%, and 6.2% and 10.7%). Most times, final failure occurred in the tension zone because of cracking at wood defects such as knots and was preceded by ductile failure in the compression zone. The entire experimental programme enabled to validate the FE model, based on the orthotropic Hill yield criterion for wood and cohesive surface for the adhesive behaviour. The proposed FE model shows the ability to predict accurately the failure load and the mid-span deflection. In addition, it can reliably forecast failure modes in both compression (upper lamella) and tension (lower lamella), as well as shear failure because of excessive shearing stresses in the adhesive. The model also supports the analysis of different reinforcement configurations and materials within the tension zone, accounting for varying wood properties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55474,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43452-025-01123-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper presents experimental and numerical investigations on structural-sized glued laminated timber beams made of coniferous wood with different reinforcing bars configurations (steel, BFRP and GFRP). Thirty-nine specimens were analysed in a four-point bending testing scheme. The highest improvements in stiffness (23.9% and 38.9%) and ultimate load-carrying capacity (13.6% and 29.4%) were observed for beams reinforced with steel bars. However, plasticisation in the steel occurred before wood failure. Beams reinforced with BFRP bars showed intermediate improvements in stiffness (8.2%, 14.2%) and ultimate load (9.6%, 17.5%), followed by those with GFRP bars (5.1% and 9.0%, and 6.2% and 10.7%). Most times, final failure occurred in the tension zone because of cracking at wood defects such as knots and was preceded by ductile failure in the compression zone. The entire experimental programme enabled to validate the FE model, based on the orthotropic Hill yield criterion for wood and cohesive surface for the adhesive behaviour. The proposed FE model shows the ability to predict accurately the failure load and the mid-span deflection. In addition, it can reliably forecast failure modes in both compression (upper lamella) and tension (lower lamella), as well as shear failure because of excessive shearing stresses in the adhesive. The model also supports the analysis of different reinforcement configurations and materials within the tension zone, accounting for varying wood properties.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
201
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering (ACME) publishes both theoretical and experimental original research articles which explore or exploit new ideas and techniques in three main areas: structural engineering, mechanics of materials and materials science. The aim of the journal is to advance science related to structural engineering focusing on structures, machines and mechanical systems. The journal also promotes advancement in the area of mechanics of materials, by publishing most recent findings in elasticity, plasticity, rheology, fatigue and fracture mechanics. The third area the journal is concentrating on is materials science, with emphasis on metals, composites, etc., their structures and properties as well as methods of evaluation. In addition to research papers, the Editorial Board welcomes state-of-the-art reviews on specialized topics. All such articles have to be sent to the Editor-in-Chief before submission for pre-submission review process. Only articles approved by the Editor-in-Chief in pre-submission process can be submitted to the journal for further processing. Approval in pre-submission stage doesn''t guarantee acceptance for publication as all papers are subject to a regular referee procedure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信