Effects of displacing modified distillers grains with dry-rolled corn in a totally mixed ration on performance of growing beef steers consuming cornstalk residue from different harvest methods

IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
V.B. Ferrari , R.G. Bondurant , G.E. Erickson , K.H. Wilke , J.C. MacDonald
{"title":"Effects of displacing modified distillers grains with dry-rolled corn in a totally mixed ration on performance of growing beef steers consuming cornstalk residue from different harvest methods","authors":"V.B. Ferrari ,&nbsp;R.G. Bondurant ,&nbsp;G.E. Erickson ,&nbsp;K.H. Wilke ,&nbsp;J.C. MacDonald","doi":"10.15232/aas.2024-02551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective was to determine the effects of displacing modified distillers grains with dry-rolled corn in a TMR for steers consuming corn residue from 2 baling methods on growth of beef steers.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Crossbred beef steers (n = 120; initial BW = 281; SD = 15 kg) were assigned in a randomized complete block design with a 4 × 3 factorial treatment arrangement (10 steer/treatment). Factors included proportion of modified distillers grains with solubles (MDGS) and dry-rolled corn (DRC; 100:0, 80:20, 60:40, and 40:60 respectively) in the concentrate, and 3 forages; either high quality (70% brome hay and 30% sorghum silage; HQ) or corn residue from 2 baling methods. Corn residue was baled as a conventional rake and bale system (RB), or by disengaging the spreader on the combine and baling the tailings (DS). Steers were fed diets as a TMR (60:40 roughage:concentrate) individually for 84 d making steer the experimental unit.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><div>A significant interaction was observed for DMI. At each proportion of MDGS in the concentrate, DMI for HQ (8.7, 9.2, 9.4, 8.5 kg/d) was greater than for RB (6.0, 5.5, 5.2, 5.6 kg/d) and DS (5.5, 5.0, 5.5, and 4.8 kg/d), which were not different. The interaction was due to the magnitude of the difference between intakes at the 40% MDGS level. Steers fed HQ had greater ending BW (393 kg) and ADG (1.31 kg/d) than those in RB (350 kg; 0.81 kg/d) and DS (346 kg; 0.76 kg/d). The G:F was not different for HQ, RB, and DS (0.148, 0.146, 0.149, respectively). As MDGS:DRC ratio decreased, ending BW (369, 365, 362, 356 kg), ADG (1.03,0.98, 0.96, 0.87 kg/d), and G:F (0.153, 0.153, 0.145, 0.139) decreased linearly.</div></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><div>Disengaging the spreader on the combine could result in similar animal performance as raking and baling for producers feeding crop residues. Decreasing the ratio of MDGS to DRC fed to growing steers fed a forage-based TMR reduced ending BW and ADG suggesting the energy supplied by MDGS cannot be replaced with DRC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"40 6","pages":"Pages 717-724"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524001113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The objective was to determine the effects of displacing modified distillers grains with dry-rolled corn in a TMR for steers consuming corn residue from 2 baling methods on growth of beef steers.

Materials and Methods

Crossbred beef steers (n = 120; initial BW = 281; SD = 15 kg) were assigned in a randomized complete block design with a 4 × 3 factorial treatment arrangement (10 steer/treatment). Factors included proportion of modified distillers grains with solubles (MDGS) and dry-rolled corn (DRC; 100:0, 80:20, 60:40, and 40:60 respectively) in the concentrate, and 3 forages; either high quality (70% brome hay and 30% sorghum silage; HQ) or corn residue from 2 baling methods. Corn residue was baled as a conventional rake and bale system (RB), or by disengaging the spreader on the combine and baling the tailings (DS). Steers were fed diets as a TMR (60:40 roughage:concentrate) individually for 84 d making steer the experimental unit.

Results and Discussion

A significant interaction was observed for DMI. At each proportion of MDGS in the concentrate, DMI for HQ (8.7, 9.2, 9.4, 8.5 kg/d) was greater than for RB (6.0, 5.5, 5.2, 5.6 kg/d) and DS (5.5, 5.0, 5.5, and 4.8 kg/d), which were not different. The interaction was due to the magnitude of the difference between intakes at the 40% MDGS level. Steers fed HQ had greater ending BW (393 kg) and ADG (1.31 kg/d) than those in RB (350 kg; 0.81 kg/d) and DS (346 kg; 0.76 kg/d). The G:F was not different for HQ, RB, and DS (0.148, 0.146, 0.149, respectively). As MDGS:DRC ratio decreased, ending BW (369, 365, 362, 356 kg), ADG (1.03,0.98, 0.96, 0.87 kg/d), and G:F (0.153, 0.153, 0.145, 0.139) decreased linearly.

Implications and Applications

Disengaging the spreader on the combine could result in similar animal performance as raking and baling for producers feeding crop residues. Decreasing the ratio of MDGS to DRC fed to growing steers fed a forage-based TMR reduced ending BW and ADG suggesting the energy supplied by MDGS cannot be replaced with DRC.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Animal Science
Applied Animal Science AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信