Assessing the impacts of chemicals reduction on arable farms through an integrated agro-economic model

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rebecca Buttinelli, Gabriele Dono, Raffaele Cortignani
{"title":"Assessing the impacts of chemicals reduction on arable farms through an integrated agro-economic model","authors":"Rebecca Buttinelli,&nbsp;Gabriele Dono,&nbsp;Raffaele Cortignani","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>The concurrent global demands of ensuring food production, preserving the environment, and responsibly managing natural resources, shape the formulation of EU policies, influencing farmers' decision-making processes and production activities. In this context the Farm to Fork Strategy plays a crucial role, setting specific targets such as a 50 % and a 20 % reduction in pesticides and fertilizers use by 2030.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This paper addresses the growing concern regarding the potential adverse effects of the Farm to Fork Strategy's targets on EU agricultural production, with a particular focus on Italian arable farms cultivating maize. The objectives are to analyze the impact of F2F targets on chemical reduction on Italian arable farms and maize grain production, identifying vulnerable areas and farms.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>A Farm Accountancy Data Network sample of 395 arable farms is analyzed through an integrated approach, combining an agro-economic supply model with an econometrically estimated translog production function. This integration enhances the model's flexibility, endogenizing maize grain gross saleable product, fertilizers, and pesticide quantities. This approach enables an assessment of the F2F targets' economic impacts in terms of economic variables and resource use, production output, and chemical intensity at the farm and crop level.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Our findings indicate that reducing chemical inputs may lead to declines in agricultural production, income, and added value for Italian arable farms in the short to medium term, alongside reductions in variable costs, irrigation water, and labor. Maize grain production is particularly vulnerable in less suitable areas, such as the Central-South. However, significant impacts are also observed in more intensive regions like North-West Italy, while the North-East is less affected due to greater input efficiency and lower costs. While crop diversification helps mitigate the impact at the farm level, it does not fully offset the effects on maize production.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>The application of uniform targets across Europe poses a significant risk to agricultural production in the short term, especially for certain sectors. To facilitate the transition to low-input agriculture, it is crucial to develop region-specific strategies and provide support to vulnerable areas and farms. The EU Commission's reconsideration of chemical reduction targets introduces new challenges, highlighting the need for solutions that balance production and environmental sustainability. This underscores the critical role of such analyses in understanding the dynamics of production processes and the impact of such policies by identifying specific vulnerabilities of sectors, regions, and contexts and supporting policy implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 104254"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24004049","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

The concurrent global demands of ensuring food production, preserving the environment, and responsibly managing natural resources, shape the formulation of EU policies, influencing farmers' decision-making processes and production activities. In this context the Farm to Fork Strategy plays a crucial role, setting specific targets such as a 50 % and a 20 % reduction in pesticides and fertilizers use by 2030.

OBJECTIVE

This paper addresses the growing concern regarding the potential adverse effects of the Farm to Fork Strategy's targets on EU agricultural production, with a particular focus on Italian arable farms cultivating maize. The objectives are to analyze the impact of F2F targets on chemical reduction on Italian arable farms and maize grain production, identifying vulnerable areas and farms.

METHODS

A Farm Accountancy Data Network sample of 395 arable farms is analyzed through an integrated approach, combining an agro-economic supply model with an econometrically estimated translog production function. This integration enhances the model's flexibility, endogenizing maize grain gross saleable product, fertilizers, and pesticide quantities. This approach enables an assessment of the F2F targets' economic impacts in terms of economic variables and resource use, production output, and chemical intensity at the farm and crop level.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that reducing chemical inputs may lead to declines in agricultural production, income, and added value for Italian arable farms in the short to medium term, alongside reductions in variable costs, irrigation water, and labor. Maize grain production is particularly vulnerable in less suitable areas, such as the Central-South. However, significant impacts are also observed in more intensive regions like North-West Italy, while the North-East is less affected due to greater input efficiency and lower costs. While crop diversification helps mitigate the impact at the farm level, it does not fully offset the effects on maize production.

SIGNIFICANCE

The application of uniform targets across Europe poses a significant risk to agricultural production in the short term, especially for certain sectors. To facilitate the transition to low-input agriculture, it is crucial to develop region-specific strategies and provide support to vulnerable areas and farms. The EU Commission's reconsideration of chemical reduction targets introduces new challenges, highlighting the need for solutions that balance production and environmental sustainability. This underscores the critical role of such analyses in understanding the dynamics of production processes and the impact of such policies by identifying specific vulnerabilities of sectors, regions, and contexts and supporting policy implementation.

Abstract Image

通过综合农业经济模型评估减少化学品对耕地的影响
同时,确保粮食生产、保护环境和负责任地管理自然资源的全球需求塑造了欧盟政策的制定,影响了农民的决策过程和生产活动。在此背景下,“从农场到餐桌”战略发挥着至关重要的作用,该战略制定了具体目标,例如到2030年将农药和化肥使用量减少50%和20%。本文讨论了关于“从农场到餐桌”战略目标对欧盟农业生产的潜在不利影响的日益关注,特别关注意大利种植玉米的耕地。目的是分析F2F目标对减少意大利耕地和玉米谷物生产的化学物质的影响,确定易受影响的地区和农场。方法采用农业经济供给模型和计量估计的超对数生产函数相结合的综合方法,对农业会计数据网络395个耕地农场样本进行分析。这种整合增强了模型的灵活性,内化了玉米谷物总销售产品、肥料和农药的数量。这种方法能够从经济变量和资源利用、产量以及农场和作物层面的化学强度等方面评估F2F目标的经济影响。结果与结论我们的研究结果表明,减少化学品投入可能导致意大利可耕地农场的农业生产、收入和附加值在中短期内下降,同时减少可变成本、灌溉用水和劳动力。在中南部等不太适宜种植的地区,玉米产量尤其脆弱。然而,在意大利西北部等集约化程度较高的地区也观察到显著的影响,而东北部由于投入效率较高和成本较低,受影响较小。虽然作物多样化有助于减轻农场一级的影响,但它并不能完全抵消对玉米生产的影响。欧洲统一目标的应用在短期内对农业生产构成重大风险,特别是对某些部门。为促进向低投入农业的过渡,必须制定针对特定区域的战略,并向脆弱地区和农场提供支持。欧盟委员会对化学品减排目标的重新考虑带来了新的挑战,强调需要找到平衡生产和环境可持续性的解决方案。这强调了通过确定部门、地区和背景的具体脆弱性并支持政策实施,这种分析在理解生产过程的动态和这种政策的影响方面的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信