New inequalities for comparing ordinary differential equations arising in global dynamic optimization

IF 2.1 3区 计算机科学 Q3 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Yingkai Song, Kamil A. Khan
{"title":"New inequalities for comparing ordinary differential equations arising in global dynamic optimization","authors":"Yingkai Song,&nbsp;Kamil A. Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.sysconle.2024.106004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Deterministic methods for global optimization typically rely on convex relaxations to infer crucial bounding information. In global dynamic optimization, comparing convex relaxation approaches can be challenging due to limitations in established differential inequality theory. In this article, we provide new comparison results for the Carathéodory solutions of related ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Our results are applicable to certain ODEs whose right-hand side functions need not be quasimonotonic or continuous with respect to state variables; they require only a weakened variant of the standard Lipschitz continuity assumption, along with mild differential inequality requirements motivated by interval analysis. Using our new comparison results, we reveal an intuitive monotonicity result for global dynamic optimization that was previously unknown: when constructing convex relaxations of parametric ODE solutions within a relaxation framework by Scott and Barton (J. Glob. Optim. 57:143–176, 2013), supplying tighter relaxations of the ODE right-hand sides will always translate into relaxations of the ODE solutions that are at least as tight.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49450,"journal":{"name":"Systems & Control Letters","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 106004"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems & Control Letters","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167691124002925","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deterministic methods for global optimization typically rely on convex relaxations to infer crucial bounding information. In global dynamic optimization, comparing convex relaxation approaches can be challenging due to limitations in established differential inequality theory. In this article, we provide new comparison results for the Carathéodory solutions of related ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Our results are applicable to certain ODEs whose right-hand side functions need not be quasimonotonic or continuous with respect to state variables; they require only a weakened variant of the standard Lipschitz continuity assumption, along with mild differential inequality requirements motivated by interval analysis. Using our new comparison results, we reveal an intuitive monotonicity result for global dynamic optimization that was previously unknown: when constructing convex relaxations of parametric ODE solutions within a relaxation framework by Scott and Barton (J. Glob. Optim. 57:143–176, 2013), supplying tighter relaxations of the ODE right-hand sides will always translate into relaxations of the ODE solutions that are at least as tight.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systems & Control Letters
Systems & Control Letters 工程技术-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1981 by two of the pre-eminent control theorists, Roger Brockett and Jan Willems, Systems & Control Letters is one of the leading journals in the field of control theory. The aim of the journal is to allow dissemination of relatively concise but highly original contributions whose high initial quality enables a relatively rapid review process. All aspects of the fields of systems and control are covered, especially mathematically-oriented and theoretical papers that have a clear relevance to engineering, physical and biological sciences, and even economics. Application-oriented papers with sophisticated and rigorous mathematical elements are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信