Examining postoperative care: Predictors of perceived pain relief and satisfaction with pain management after orthopedic surgeries

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING
Heba Khalil , Abedalmajeed Shajrawi , Ahmed Mohammad Al-Smadi , Wegdan Bani-Issa , Fatma Refaat Ahmed , Loai AbuSharour , Nabeel AL. Yateem , Khalil Yousef
{"title":"Examining postoperative care: Predictors of perceived pain relief and satisfaction with pain management after orthopedic surgeries","authors":"Heba Khalil ,&nbsp;Abedalmajeed Shajrawi ,&nbsp;Ahmed Mohammad Al-Smadi ,&nbsp;Wegdan Bani-Issa ,&nbsp;Fatma Refaat Ahmed ,&nbsp;Loai AbuSharour ,&nbsp;Nabeel AL. Yateem ,&nbsp;Khalil Yousef","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2025.101159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study examines predictors of postoperative pain relief and patient satisfaction among orthopedic patients in Jordan, emphasizing demographic and clinical factors, patient involvement in pain management, Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) utilization, and non-pharmacological pain relief techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This observational, predictive study included 300 orthopedic surgery patients. Pain intensity was measured 24 h post-surgery, and patients completed the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R). Demographic and clinical data were collected from medical records. Statistical analyses, including t-tests, ANOVA, and regression models, identified significant predictors of perceived pain relief and satisfaction with pain management.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients reported high pain levels early post-surgery, with an average peak pain intensity of 8.52/10. Combined treatments provided an average pain relief score of 81.9%, and satisfaction with pain management averaged 7.86. Higher satisfaction was associated with PCA use, non-pharmacological methods, and information on pain management options. Key predictors of pain relief included surgery type, pain management information availability, the impact of opioid side effects, and pain's impact on activities, sleep, and emotional well-being. Satisfaction was also predicted by information on pain treatment, opioid side effects, and the total impact of pain.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Enhanced patient education, active involvement in care, individualized non-pharmacological pain relief methods, and PCA use improve perceived pain relief and satisfaction with pain management. This study emphasizes the importance of personalized, multimodal pain management strategies to improve postoperative care and enhance recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124125000036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study examines predictors of postoperative pain relief and patient satisfaction among orthopedic patients in Jordan, emphasizing demographic and clinical factors, patient involvement in pain management, Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) utilization, and non-pharmacological pain relief techniques.

Methods

This observational, predictive study included 300 orthopedic surgery patients. Pain intensity was measured 24 h post-surgery, and patients completed the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R). Demographic and clinical data were collected from medical records. Statistical analyses, including t-tests, ANOVA, and regression models, identified significant predictors of perceived pain relief and satisfaction with pain management.

Results

Patients reported high pain levels early post-surgery, with an average peak pain intensity of 8.52/10. Combined treatments provided an average pain relief score of 81.9%, and satisfaction with pain management averaged 7.86. Higher satisfaction was associated with PCA use, non-pharmacological methods, and information on pain management options. Key predictors of pain relief included surgery type, pain management information availability, the impact of opioid side effects, and pain's impact on activities, sleep, and emotional well-being. Satisfaction was also predicted by information on pain treatment, opioid side effects, and the total impact of pain.

Conclusion

Enhanced patient education, active involvement in care, individualized non-pharmacological pain relief methods, and PCA use improve perceived pain relief and satisfaction with pain management. This study emphasizes the importance of personalized, multimodal pain management strategies to improve postoperative care and enhance recovery.
检查术后护理:骨科手术后感知疼痛缓解和疼痛管理满意度的预测因素
目的:本研究探讨约旦骨科患者术后疼痛缓解和患者满意度的预测因素,强调人口统计学和临床因素、患者参与疼痛管理、患者自控镇痛(PCA)的使用和非药物疼痛缓解技术。方法本观察性、预测性研究纳入300例骨科手术患者。术后24小时测量疼痛强度,患者完成修订后的美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷(APS-POQ-R)。从医疗记录中收集人口统计和临床数据。统计分析,包括t检验、方差分析和回归模型,确定了感知疼痛缓解和疼痛管理满意度的显著预测因子。结果患者术后早期疼痛水平较高,平均峰值疼痛强度为8.52/10。联合治疗的平均疼痛缓解评分为81.9%,疼痛管理满意度平均为7.86。较高的满意度与PCA的使用、非药物方法和疼痛管理选择的信息有关。疼痛缓解的关键预测因素包括手术类型、疼痛管理信息的可用性、阿片类药物副作用的影响、疼痛对活动、睡眠和情绪健康的影响。满意度还可以通过疼痛治疗、阿片类药物副作用和疼痛总影响的信息来预测。结论加强患者教育、积极参与护理、个性化的非药物缓解疼痛方法和PCA的使用可提高疼痛缓解感和疼痛管理满意度。本研究强调个性化、多模式疼痛管理策略对改善术后护理和促进康复的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信