Undergraduates' appraisal and coping responses to dis/misinformation issues on social media: Implications for information literacy education

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Sei-Ching Joanna Sin , Kyung-Sun Kim
{"title":"Undergraduates' appraisal and coping responses to dis/misinformation issues on social media: Implications for information literacy education","authors":"Sei-Ching Joanna Sin ,&nbsp;Kyung-Sun Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social media is increasingly recognized as a prominent stressor and source of societal problems (e.g., dis/misinformation) that impact students' growth and well-being. Academic libraries, as leaders in information literacy (IL), can play an important role in mitigating the problem. This includes advancing a holistic IL education, focusing not only on students' intellectual growth but also their affective responses to informational issues, as some affective reactions may lead to unproductive behaviors. To discover areas warranting IL interventions, the current study identified a typology of undergraduates' responses to dis/misinformation problems on social media. Applying the <em>Transactional Model of Stress and Coping</em> by Lazarus and Folkman, the study analyzed students' Twitter usage, cognitive appraisals, and coping responses (U-A-C) to dis/misinformation on Twitter. Two waves of survey were conducted, collecting a total of 1735 responses from undergraduates. The study identified five user profiles. The most prevalent profile (36 % of the sample) showed scant coping responses to dis/misinformation issues in all three categories (escape-avoidance, planful problem-solving, and seeking social support). Demographic differences (including gender and age) in U-A-C profiles were also found. The results revealed several patterns that IL education may need to address. For instance, one user profile showed low primary and secondary appraisals (i.e., low levels of perceived importance and self-efficacy related to addressing dis/misinformation problems) and high escape-avoidance coping, which would benefit from fine-tuned IL training that not only develops students' skills and self-confidence in IL, but also seeks to reduce avoidance behaviors. Implications for IL training and research are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 2","pages":"Article 103019"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133325000151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media is increasingly recognized as a prominent stressor and source of societal problems (e.g., dis/misinformation) that impact students' growth and well-being. Academic libraries, as leaders in information literacy (IL), can play an important role in mitigating the problem. This includes advancing a holistic IL education, focusing not only on students' intellectual growth but also their affective responses to informational issues, as some affective reactions may lead to unproductive behaviors. To discover areas warranting IL interventions, the current study identified a typology of undergraduates' responses to dis/misinformation problems on social media. Applying the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping by Lazarus and Folkman, the study analyzed students' Twitter usage, cognitive appraisals, and coping responses (U-A-C) to dis/misinformation on Twitter. Two waves of survey were conducted, collecting a total of 1735 responses from undergraduates. The study identified five user profiles. The most prevalent profile (36 % of the sample) showed scant coping responses to dis/misinformation issues in all three categories (escape-avoidance, planful problem-solving, and seeking social support). Demographic differences (including gender and age) in U-A-C profiles were also found. The results revealed several patterns that IL education may need to address. For instance, one user profile showed low primary and secondary appraisals (i.e., low levels of perceived importance and self-efficacy related to addressing dis/misinformation problems) and high escape-avoidance coping, which would benefit from fine-tuned IL training that not only develops students' skills and self-confidence in IL, but also seeks to reduce avoidance behaviors. Implications for IL training and research are discussed.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信