Wei Wang , Krishanu Roy , Hooman Rezaeian , Kang Huang , Shubham Tiwari , James B.P. Lim
{"title":"Compressive behavior of a novel cold-formed steel built-up box section: Tests, modelling and design","authors":"Wei Wang , Krishanu Roy , Hooman Rezaeian , Kang Huang , Shubham Tiwari , James B.P. Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.tws.2025.113024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates a novel built-up box section constructed from single cold-formed steel (CFS) C- and U-sections, which are connected using self-drilling screws along their extended flanges. Both experimental and numerical analyses were conducted to study the buckling behavior and ultimate strength of these pin-ended, axially loaded CFS built-up box section columns. The study focuses on key parameters such as thicknesses (0.95 mm and 1.15 mm), screw spacing (300 mm and 600 mm), and slenderness ratios (42, 72, 102, 132). A total of 48 specimens were tested under axial compression, exhibiting significant local-distortional and local-flexural interactive buckling modes. Finite element models were developed using ABAQUS software and validated based on the experimental results. The numerical simulations were used to assess the effects of screw spacing and thickness on the ultimate strength of the built-up box columns. The ultimate strengths obtained from both the experiments and the finite element analysis were then compared to the predictions made using the Effective Width Method (EWM) and the Direct Strength Method (DSM), as outlined in AISI S100 (2016) and AS/NZS 4600 (2018). The comparison shows that DSM overestimated the axial capacity of these novel built-up box section columns by an average of 15 %, while EWM was overly conservative, with mean experimental-to-design strength ratios exceeding 2.5.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49435,"journal":{"name":"Thin-Walled Structures","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 113024"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thin-Walled Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263823125001181","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper investigates a novel built-up box section constructed from single cold-formed steel (CFS) C- and U-sections, which are connected using self-drilling screws along their extended flanges. Both experimental and numerical analyses were conducted to study the buckling behavior and ultimate strength of these pin-ended, axially loaded CFS built-up box section columns. The study focuses on key parameters such as thicknesses (0.95 mm and 1.15 mm), screw spacing (300 mm and 600 mm), and slenderness ratios (42, 72, 102, 132). A total of 48 specimens were tested under axial compression, exhibiting significant local-distortional and local-flexural interactive buckling modes. Finite element models were developed using ABAQUS software and validated based on the experimental results. The numerical simulations were used to assess the effects of screw spacing and thickness on the ultimate strength of the built-up box columns. The ultimate strengths obtained from both the experiments and the finite element analysis were then compared to the predictions made using the Effective Width Method (EWM) and the Direct Strength Method (DSM), as outlined in AISI S100 (2016) and AS/NZS 4600 (2018). The comparison shows that DSM overestimated the axial capacity of these novel built-up box section columns by an average of 15 %, while EWM was overly conservative, with mean experimental-to-design strength ratios exceeding 2.5.
期刊介绍:
Thin-walled structures comprises an important and growing proportion of engineering construction with areas of application becoming increasingly diverse, ranging from aircraft, bridges, ships and oil rigs to storage vessels, industrial buildings and warehouses.
Many factors, including cost and weight economy, new materials and processes and the growth of powerful methods of analysis have contributed to this growth, and led to the need for a journal which concentrates specifically on structures in which problems arise due to the thinness of the walls. This field includes cold– formed sections, plate and shell structures, reinforced plastics structures and aluminium structures, and is of importance in many branches of engineering.
The primary criterion for consideration of papers in Thin–Walled Structures is that they must be concerned with thin–walled structures or the basic problems inherent in thin–walled structures. Provided this criterion is satisfied no restriction is placed on the type of construction, material or field of application. Papers on theory, experiment, design, etc., are published and it is expected that many papers will contain aspects of all three.