{"title":"Enhancing simulations of biomass and nitrous oxide emissions in vineyard, orchard, and vegetable cropping systems","authors":"Mu Hong , Yao Zhang , Lidong Li , Keith Paustian","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) is a potent greenhouse gas with a high global warming potential. Specialty crop (SC) systems, including vineyards, orchards, and vegetable farms, are among the highest value crops grown and emit N<sub>2</sub>O. Knowledge regarding N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from SCs remains limited, necessitating simulations using process-based models. However, model calibration and validation for SC biomass dynamics and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions are lacking.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aimed to: 1) conduct calibrations and validations of DayCent®, a process-based model, for SC biomass dynamics in eight SC systems with diverse pedological and climatic conditions; 2) evaluate N<sub>2</sub>O emission simulations based only on calibrating crop-specific parameters; and 3) simulate N<sub>2</sub>O emissions of each SC production region in California as a case study.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>A comprehensive dataset of 408 biomass carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) and 185 N<sub>2</sub>O emission observations from global field studies in eight SC systems was compiled. The DayCent model was calibrated and validated for SC biomass dynamics and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions across various management treatments, soils, and climates. Current yield-scaled N<sub>2</sub>O emissions were simulated for each SC among major production regions in California.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Calibration on crop-specific parameters of DayCent based on the biomass collection can generally improve model performance for simulating biomass C (MRE = 0.148, RRMSE = 0.368, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.913, IA = 0.976), N (MRE = 0.549, RRMSE = 0.711, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.298, IA = 0.730), and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions (MRE = 1.226, RRMSE = 0.971, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.407, IA = 0.772), compared with using original crop-specific parameterization for biomass C (MRE = 0.309, RRMSE = 0.847, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.589, IA = 0.865), N (MRE = 1.327, RRMSE = 0.996, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.001, IA = 0.366), and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions (MRE = 1.454, RRMSE = 1.102, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.326, IA = 0.728), which also outperformed the 2019 refined IPCC Tier 1 method (MRE = 4.085, RRMSE = 1.835, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.031, IA = 0.448). Yield-scaled annual N<sub>2</sub>O emissions averaged over the major production areas in California were 0.45, 0.18, 0.28, 0.46 kg N<sub>2</sub>O_N MgC<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> for vineyards, almond, peach, and walnut orchards, and 1.02, 1.41, 1.18, and 1.37 kg N<sub>2</sub>O_N MgC<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> for lettuce, broccoli, cauliflower, and tomato cropping systems, respectively. The case study identified high-emission regions and highlighted the spatial and temporal N<sub>2</sub>O emission variations at the county level.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This is one of the very few comprehensive studies that compiled the largest dataset of biomass and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from SC systems, as well as calibrated and validated model applications across diverse species, management practices, soil and climatic types. The findings underscored the need for process-based assessment of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and targeted adoption of mitigation practices in high-emission areas to reduce emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 104243"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24003937","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CONTEXT
Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent greenhouse gas with a high global warming potential. Specialty crop (SC) systems, including vineyards, orchards, and vegetable farms, are among the highest value crops grown and emit N2O. Knowledge regarding N2O emissions from SCs remains limited, necessitating simulations using process-based models. However, model calibration and validation for SC biomass dynamics and N2O emissions are lacking.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to: 1) conduct calibrations and validations of DayCent®, a process-based model, for SC biomass dynamics in eight SC systems with diverse pedological and climatic conditions; 2) evaluate N2O emission simulations based only on calibrating crop-specific parameters; and 3) simulate N2O emissions of each SC production region in California as a case study.
METHODS
A comprehensive dataset of 408 biomass carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) and 185 N2O emission observations from global field studies in eight SC systems was compiled. The DayCent model was calibrated and validated for SC biomass dynamics and N2O emissions across various management treatments, soils, and climates. Current yield-scaled N2O emissions were simulated for each SC among major production regions in California.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Calibration on crop-specific parameters of DayCent based on the biomass collection can generally improve model performance for simulating biomass C (MRE = 0.148, RRMSE = 0.368, R2 = 0.913, IA = 0.976), N (MRE = 0.549, RRMSE = 0.711, R2 = 0.298, IA = 0.730), and N2O emissions (MRE = 1.226, RRMSE = 0.971, R2 = 0.407, IA = 0.772), compared with using original crop-specific parameterization for biomass C (MRE = 0.309, RRMSE = 0.847, R2 = 0.589, IA = 0.865), N (MRE = 1.327, RRMSE = 0.996, R2 = 0.001, IA = 0.366), and N2O emissions (MRE = 1.454, RRMSE = 1.102, R2 = 0.326, IA = 0.728), which also outperformed the 2019 refined IPCC Tier 1 method (MRE = 4.085, RRMSE = 1.835, R2 = 0.031, IA = 0.448). Yield-scaled annual N2O emissions averaged over the major production areas in California were 0.45, 0.18, 0.28, 0.46 kg N2O_N MgC−1 yr−1 for vineyards, almond, peach, and walnut orchards, and 1.02, 1.41, 1.18, and 1.37 kg N2O_N MgC−1 yr−1 for lettuce, broccoli, cauliflower, and tomato cropping systems, respectively. The case study identified high-emission regions and highlighted the spatial and temporal N2O emission variations at the county level.
SIGNIFICANCE
This is one of the very few comprehensive studies that compiled the largest dataset of biomass and N2O emissions from SC systems, as well as calibrated and validated model applications across diverse species, management practices, soil and climatic types. The findings underscored the need for process-based assessment of N2O emissions and targeted adoption of mitigation practices in high-emission areas to reduce emissions.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.