Risk-based optimal management of a multi-energy community integrated with P2X-based vector-bridging systems considering natural gas/hydrogen refueling and electric vehicle charging stations

IF 4.2 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Zahra Moshaver Shoja , Ali Bohluli Oskouei , Morteza Nazari-Heris
{"title":"Risk-based optimal management of a multi-energy community integrated with P2X-based vector-bridging systems considering natural gas/hydrogen refueling and electric vehicle charging stations","authors":"Zahra Moshaver Shoja ,&nbsp;Ali Bohluli Oskouei ,&nbsp;Morteza Nazari-Heris","doi":"10.1016/j.ref.2025.100680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Growing environmental concerns have increased interest in renewable energy-powered natural gas/hydrogen refueling (NGHR) and electric charging (EC) stations, driving the adoption of advanced energy resources like power-to-X (P2X) technologies in energy systems. This paper introduces vector-bridging systems (VBSs). In this concept, P2X technologies coupled with energy storage form a bridge across multiple energy vectors, such as electricity, gas, heat, and hydrogen, to enhance flexibility in community-integrated energy systems (CIESs). We propose a risk-based optimal energy management framework that integrates P2X-based VBSs to optimize participation in multi-energy markets while meeting power, gas, heat, and hydrogen demands from NGHR and EC stations at minimum cost. An incentive-based integrated demand response (IDR) model is also incorporated to reduce daily operation costs for power and heat demands. To manage uncertainties, a hybrid multi-objective info-gap decision theory (MOIGDT)/stochastic programming approach is used, adapting to the nature and knowledge of uncertain parameters. The multi-objective problem is solved using the augmented ε-constraint method, with the best solution selected through fuzzy decision-making and the min-max approach. Numerical results demonstrate that the combined use of P2X-based VBSs and IDR lowers daily operating costs by up to 8.36% and reduces risk levels in short-term CIES scheduling by 11.3%, underscoring the effectiveness of VBSs in achieving cost-efficient, resilient energy management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29780,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy Focus","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 100680"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175500842500002X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing environmental concerns have increased interest in renewable energy-powered natural gas/hydrogen refueling (NGHR) and electric charging (EC) stations, driving the adoption of advanced energy resources like power-to-X (P2X) technologies in energy systems. This paper introduces vector-bridging systems (VBSs). In this concept, P2X technologies coupled with energy storage form a bridge across multiple energy vectors, such as electricity, gas, heat, and hydrogen, to enhance flexibility in community-integrated energy systems (CIESs). We propose a risk-based optimal energy management framework that integrates P2X-based VBSs to optimize participation in multi-energy markets while meeting power, gas, heat, and hydrogen demands from NGHR and EC stations at minimum cost. An incentive-based integrated demand response (IDR) model is also incorporated to reduce daily operation costs for power and heat demands. To manage uncertainties, a hybrid multi-objective info-gap decision theory (MOIGDT)/stochastic programming approach is used, adapting to the nature and knowledge of uncertain parameters. The multi-objective problem is solved using the augmented ε-constraint method, with the best solution selected through fuzzy decision-making and the min-max approach. Numerical results demonstrate that the combined use of P2X-based VBSs and IDR lowers daily operating costs by up to 8.36% and reduces risk levels in short-term CIES scheduling by 11.3%, underscoring the effectiveness of VBSs in achieving cost-efficient, resilient energy management.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable Energy Focus
Renewable Energy Focus Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信