{"title":"Multilevel student-perceived teaching practices profiles: Associations with competence beliefs, task value, behavioral engagement, and academic achievement","authors":"Elizabeth Olivier , Benoit Galand , Jessica Bélanger , Alexandre J.S. Morin","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study assesses student perceptions of their teachers' practices and their associations with motivational and academic achievement. Multilevel latent profile analyses (3710 grade 9 students, 245 classrooms) identified five profiles at the student level: <em>Average with focus on rules</em> (20.50 %), <em>Average with focus on need-support</em> (30.45 %), <em>Differential treatment</em> (18.86 %), <em>Need-support and differential treatment</em> (11.70 %), and <em>High-on-all</em> (18.50 %). Students corresponding to the <em>High-on-all</em> profile reported the most positive outcomes. We identified three profiles at the classroom level: <em>Mostly differential treatment</em> (20.75 %), which was associated with the worst outcomes, <em>Average and high-on-all</em> (41.20 %), and <em>Mostly need-supportive</em> (38.06 %).</div></div><div><h3>Educational Relevance Statement</h3><div>This study has implications for initial and continuing teacher training. By identifying profiles of teaching practices perceived by students and classrooms, the study informs what combinations of practices are positively associated with different aspects of student motivation and achievement, according to their perceptions. The findings also contribute to understanding that some practices (e.g., differential treatment), generally thought to deplete student motivation, might not need to be proscribed as long as they are counterbalanced with high levels of other positive practices (e.g., need supportive practices and rule enforcement).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 102631"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025000068","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The study assesses student perceptions of their teachers' practices and their associations with motivational and academic achievement. Multilevel latent profile analyses (3710 grade 9 students, 245 classrooms) identified five profiles at the student level: Average with focus on rules (20.50 %), Average with focus on need-support (30.45 %), Differential treatment (18.86 %), Need-support and differential treatment (11.70 %), and High-on-all (18.50 %). Students corresponding to the High-on-all profile reported the most positive outcomes. We identified three profiles at the classroom level: Mostly differential treatment (20.75 %), which was associated with the worst outcomes, Average and high-on-all (41.20 %), and Mostly need-supportive (38.06 %).
Educational Relevance Statement
This study has implications for initial and continuing teacher training. By identifying profiles of teaching practices perceived by students and classrooms, the study informs what combinations of practices are positively associated with different aspects of student motivation and achievement, according to their perceptions. The findings also contribute to understanding that some practices (e.g., differential treatment), generally thought to deplete student motivation, might not need to be proscribed as long as they are counterbalanced with high levels of other positive practices (e.g., need supportive practices and rule enforcement).
期刊介绍:
Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).