Redefining education: The role of study crafting in enhancing students' well-being, self-direction, and academic achievement

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Lorenzo Duchi , Lisette Wijnia , Sofie Loyens , Fred Paas
{"title":"Redefining education: The role of study crafting in enhancing students' well-being, self-direction, and academic achievement","authors":"Lorenzo Duchi ,&nbsp;Lisette Wijnia ,&nbsp;Sofie Loyens ,&nbsp;Fred Paas","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we examine the concept of “study crafting”, whereby students personalize their education in line with their strengths, interests, and goals. It is based on the concept of job crafting that has gained traction in work and organizational psychology. Study crafting could be valuable in higher education, where personalized learning experiences are increasingly vital. We developed a measurement for study crafting and analyzed its relationships with related constructs in a sample of 382 Dutch university students. Study crafting was positively associated with psychological need satisfaction, self-directed learning skills, and academic satisfaction, and negatively with burnout. Structural equation modeling revealed that study crafting had an indirect effect on self-directed learning, burnout, academic satisfaction, and academic achievement through psychological need satisfaction. While our findings suggest significant associations between study crafting and various student outcomes, it is important to note that cross-sectional designs limit the ability to draw causal inferences.</div></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implication statement</h3><div>This study introduces “study crafting” as a concept for creating personalized learning experiences that embrace students' knowledge, skills, attitudes, and ambitions. It finds that students can actively shape their education to match their strengths, interests, and goals, which in turn impacts their psychological well-being, self-directed learning skills, as well as academic satisfaction and success. The research highlights that learners can proactively design their education to experience a more engaged, empowered, and healthier life. By fostering a partnership between students and educators, the study suggests a shift towards a more student-centered education, where learners have a significant say in their educational journey, enhancing its relevance and impact on their lives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 102608"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024002012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we examine the concept of “study crafting”, whereby students personalize their education in line with their strengths, interests, and goals. It is based on the concept of job crafting that has gained traction in work and organizational psychology. Study crafting could be valuable in higher education, where personalized learning experiences are increasingly vital. We developed a measurement for study crafting and analyzed its relationships with related constructs in a sample of 382 Dutch university students. Study crafting was positively associated with psychological need satisfaction, self-directed learning skills, and academic satisfaction, and negatively with burnout. Structural equation modeling revealed that study crafting had an indirect effect on self-directed learning, burnout, academic satisfaction, and academic achievement through psychological need satisfaction. While our findings suggest significant associations between study crafting and various student outcomes, it is important to note that cross-sectional designs limit the ability to draw causal inferences.

Educational relevance and implication statement

This study introduces “study crafting” as a concept for creating personalized learning experiences that embrace students' knowledge, skills, attitudes, and ambitions. It finds that students can actively shape their education to match their strengths, interests, and goals, which in turn impacts their psychological well-being, self-directed learning skills, as well as academic satisfaction and success. The research highlights that learners can proactively design their education to experience a more engaged, empowered, and healthier life. By fostering a partnership between students and educators, the study suggests a shift towards a more student-centered education, where learners have a significant say in their educational journey, enhancing its relevance and impact on their lives.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信