Changes in socioeconomic inequality in self-assessed health in South Africa: The contributions of changes in inequalities between and within socioeconomic groups
IF 3.6 2区 医学Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"Changes in socioeconomic inequality in self-assessed health in South Africa: The contributions of changes in inequalities between and within socioeconomic groups","authors":"John E. Ataguba","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Globally, poor health is associated with lower socioeconomic status (i.e., the gradient). While significant socio-demographic drivers of socioeconomic inequalities have been documented in South Africa, little is known about changes in socioeconomic inequalities in health between and within socioeconomic groups, an essential consideration for closing the gaps between socioeconomic groups. This paper assesses changes in health inequalities in South Africa, using self-assessed health (SAH) to uncover the relative contributions of inequalities between and within socioeconomic groups to changes in socioeconomic inequalities in SAH. It uses data from five waves (2008, 2010/11, 2012, 2014/15, and 2017) of South Africa's nationally representative National Income Dynamics Study (NIDS) as cross-sectional with a final sample size ranging between 13,732 and 21,303 adults (>18 years). Based on five categories, SAH was recategorised and dichotomised as “good health” with SAH = 1. Socioeconomic status and quintiles were based on per capita household expenditure. The standard concentration index measured socioeconomic inequality in SAH. A recent methodology decomposes changes in the concentration index of SAH into changes in inequality within and between socioeconomic groups. A pro-poor shift or change is when socioeconomic inequality in health (including for between- and within-socioeconomic groups) reduces between two time periods, while an increase in inequalities means a pro-rich shift or change. The results show a significant pro-rich gradient in SAH among adults in South Africa (concentration index ranging between 0.0053 and 0.0327), with good health reported more by relatively wealthier adults than their more socioeconomically deprived counterparts. This pro-rich gradient declined overall between 2008 and 2017 (a pro-poor shift), associated mainly (between 96% and 100%) with reduced inequalities between socioeconomic groups, i.e., closing gaps between socioeconomic groups. Addressing health inequalities in South Africa requires a multisectoral approach prioritising socioeconomically deprived individuals and policy to reduce health disparities between groups that leave no one behind.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47780,"journal":{"name":"Ssm-Population Health","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101755"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ssm-Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827325000096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Globally, poor health is associated with lower socioeconomic status (i.e., the gradient). While significant socio-demographic drivers of socioeconomic inequalities have been documented in South Africa, little is known about changes in socioeconomic inequalities in health between and within socioeconomic groups, an essential consideration for closing the gaps between socioeconomic groups. This paper assesses changes in health inequalities in South Africa, using self-assessed health (SAH) to uncover the relative contributions of inequalities between and within socioeconomic groups to changes in socioeconomic inequalities in SAH. It uses data from five waves (2008, 2010/11, 2012, 2014/15, and 2017) of South Africa's nationally representative National Income Dynamics Study (NIDS) as cross-sectional with a final sample size ranging between 13,732 and 21,303 adults (>18 years). Based on five categories, SAH was recategorised and dichotomised as “good health” with SAH = 1. Socioeconomic status and quintiles were based on per capita household expenditure. The standard concentration index measured socioeconomic inequality in SAH. A recent methodology decomposes changes in the concentration index of SAH into changes in inequality within and between socioeconomic groups. A pro-poor shift or change is when socioeconomic inequality in health (including for between- and within-socioeconomic groups) reduces between two time periods, while an increase in inequalities means a pro-rich shift or change. The results show a significant pro-rich gradient in SAH among adults in South Africa (concentration index ranging between 0.0053 and 0.0327), with good health reported more by relatively wealthier adults than their more socioeconomically deprived counterparts. This pro-rich gradient declined overall between 2008 and 2017 (a pro-poor shift), associated mainly (between 96% and 100%) with reduced inequalities between socioeconomic groups, i.e., closing gaps between socioeconomic groups. Addressing health inequalities in South Africa requires a multisectoral approach prioritising socioeconomically deprived individuals and policy to reduce health disparities between groups that leave no one behind.
期刊介绍:
SSM - Population Health. The new online only, open access, peer reviewed journal in all areas relating Social Science research to population health. SSM - Population Health shares the same Editors-in Chief and general approach to manuscripts as its sister journal, Social Science & Medicine. The journal takes a broad approach to the field especially welcoming interdisciplinary papers from across the Social Sciences and allied areas. SSM - Population Health offers an alternative outlet for work which might not be considered, or is classed as ''out of scope'' elsewhere, and prioritizes fast peer review and publication to the benefit of authors and readers. The journal welcomes all types of paper from traditional primary research articles, replication studies, short communications, methodological studies, instrument validation, opinion pieces, literature reviews, etc. SSM - Population Health also offers the opportunity to publish special issues or sections to reflect current interest and research in topical or developing areas. The journal fully supports authors wanting to present their research in an innovative fashion though the use of multimedia formats.