Changes in socioeconomic inequality in self-assessed health in South Africa: The contributions of changes in inequalities between and within socioeconomic groups

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
John E. Ataguba
{"title":"Changes in socioeconomic inequality in self-assessed health in South Africa: The contributions of changes in inequalities between and within socioeconomic groups","authors":"John E. Ataguba","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Globally, poor health is associated with lower socioeconomic status (i.e., the gradient). While significant socio-demographic drivers of socioeconomic inequalities have been documented in South Africa, little is known about changes in socioeconomic inequalities in health between and within socioeconomic groups, an essential consideration for closing the gaps between socioeconomic groups. This paper assesses changes in health inequalities in South Africa, using self-assessed health (SAH) to uncover the relative contributions of inequalities between and within socioeconomic groups to changes in socioeconomic inequalities in SAH. It uses data from five waves (2008, 2010/11, 2012, 2014/15, and 2017) of South Africa's nationally representative National Income Dynamics Study (NIDS) as cross-sectional with a final sample size ranging between 13,732 and 21,303 adults (&gt;18 years). Based on five categories, SAH was recategorised and dichotomised as “good health” with SAH = 1. Socioeconomic status and quintiles were based on per capita household expenditure. The standard concentration index measured socioeconomic inequality in SAH. A recent methodology decomposes changes in the concentration index of SAH into changes in inequality within and between socioeconomic groups. A pro-poor shift or change is when socioeconomic inequality in health (including for between- and within-socioeconomic groups) reduces between two time periods, while an increase in inequalities means a pro-rich shift or change. The results show a significant pro-rich gradient in SAH among adults in South Africa (concentration index ranging between 0.0053 and 0.0327), with good health reported more by relatively wealthier adults than their more socioeconomically deprived counterparts. This pro-rich gradient declined overall between 2008 and 2017 (a pro-poor shift), associated mainly (between 96% and 100%) with reduced inequalities between socioeconomic groups, i.e., closing gaps between socioeconomic groups. Addressing health inequalities in South Africa requires a multisectoral approach prioritising socioeconomically deprived individuals and policy to reduce health disparities between groups that leave no one behind.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47780,"journal":{"name":"Ssm-Population Health","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101755"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ssm-Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827325000096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, poor health is associated with lower socioeconomic status (i.e., the gradient). While significant socio-demographic drivers of socioeconomic inequalities have been documented in South Africa, little is known about changes in socioeconomic inequalities in health between and within socioeconomic groups, an essential consideration for closing the gaps between socioeconomic groups. This paper assesses changes in health inequalities in South Africa, using self-assessed health (SAH) to uncover the relative contributions of inequalities between and within socioeconomic groups to changes in socioeconomic inequalities in SAH. It uses data from five waves (2008, 2010/11, 2012, 2014/15, and 2017) of South Africa's nationally representative National Income Dynamics Study (NIDS) as cross-sectional with a final sample size ranging between 13,732 and 21,303 adults (>18 years). Based on five categories, SAH was recategorised and dichotomised as “good health” with SAH = 1. Socioeconomic status and quintiles were based on per capita household expenditure. The standard concentration index measured socioeconomic inequality in SAH. A recent methodology decomposes changes in the concentration index of SAH into changes in inequality within and between socioeconomic groups. A pro-poor shift or change is when socioeconomic inequality in health (including for between- and within-socioeconomic groups) reduces between two time periods, while an increase in inequalities means a pro-rich shift or change. The results show a significant pro-rich gradient in SAH among adults in South Africa (concentration index ranging between 0.0053 and 0.0327), with good health reported more by relatively wealthier adults than their more socioeconomically deprived counterparts. This pro-rich gradient declined overall between 2008 and 2017 (a pro-poor shift), associated mainly (between 96% and 100%) with reduced inequalities between socioeconomic groups, i.e., closing gaps between socioeconomic groups. Addressing health inequalities in South Africa requires a multisectoral approach prioritising socioeconomically deprived individuals and policy to reduce health disparities between groups that leave no one behind.
在全球范围内,健康状况不佳与较低的社会经济地位有关(即梯度)。虽然南非社会经济不平等的重要社会人口驱动因素已被记录在案,但人们对社会经济群体之间以及社会经济群体内部健康方面的社会经济不平等的变化却知之甚少,而这正是缩小社会经济群体之间差距的一个重要考虑因素。本文评估了南非健康不平等的变化,利用自我评估健康(SAH)来揭示社会经济群体之间和内部的不平等对 SAH 中社会经济不平等变化的相对贡献。该研究使用了南非具有全国代表性的国民收入动态研究(NIDS)五次波次(2008、2010/11、2012、2014/15 和 2017 年)的横截面数据,最终样本量介于 13732 到 21303 个成年人(18 岁)之间。根据五个类别,SAH 被重新分类,并被二分为 "健康状况良好",SAH = 1。社会经济地位和五分位数以人均家庭支出为基础。标准集中指数衡量了社会经济在 SAH 方面的不平等。最近的一种方法将 SAH 集中指数的变化分解为社会经济群体内部和群体之间不平等的变化。当健康方面的社会经济不平等(包括社会经济群体之间和内部的不平等)在两个时间段之间减少时,就是有利于穷人的转变或变化,而不平等的增加则意味着有利于富人的转变或变化。研究结果显示,南非成年人的 SAH 存在明显的富裕梯度(集中指数介于 0.0053 和 0.0327 之间),相对富裕的成年人比社会经济条件较差的成年人更容易报告健康状况良好。2008 年至 2017 年间,这种有利于富人的梯度总体上有所下降(有利于穷人的转变),这主要(96% 至 100%)与社会经济群体之间的不平等减少有关,即缩小了社会经济群体之间的差距。解决南非的健康不平等问题需要采取多部门方法,优先考虑社会经济贫困的个人和政策,以减少群体间的健康差距,不让任何人掉队。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ssm-Population Health
Ssm-Population Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
298
审稿时长
101 days
期刊介绍: SSM - Population Health. The new online only, open access, peer reviewed journal in all areas relating Social Science research to population health. SSM - Population Health shares the same Editors-in Chief and general approach to manuscripts as its sister journal, Social Science & Medicine. The journal takes a broad approach to the field especially welcoming interdisciplinary papers from across the Social Sciences and allied areas. SSM - Population Health offers an alternative outlet for work which might not be considered, or is classed as ''out of scope'' elsewhere, and prioritizes fast peer review and publication to the benefit of authors and readers. The journal welcomes all types of paper from traditional primary research articles, replication studies, short communications, methodological studies, instrument validation, opinion pieces, literature reviews, etc. SSM - Population Health also offers the opportunity to publish special issues or sections to reflect current interest and research in topical or developing areas. The journal fully supports authors wanting to present their research in an innovative fashion though the use of multimedia formats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信