Music in healthcare: Investigating music preferences for pain management across twenty countries

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Antonia S. Becker , Emy S. van der Valk Bouman , Julian Schaap , Markus Klimek , Joost Oude Groeniger
{"title":"Music in healthcare: Investigating music preferences for pain management across twenty countries","authors":"Antonia S. Becker ,&nbsp;Emy S. van der Valk Bouman ,&nbsp;Julian Schaap ,&nbsp;Markus Klimek ,&nbsp;Joost Oude Groeniger","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Music is increasingly investigated in healthcare to manage pain, anxiety and stress. Previous studies have demonstrated that listening to (preferred) music is effective for pain relief, but rarely explore whether people are open to instrumentalizing music in healthcare. Therefore, this study investigates 1) to what extent people across twenty countries are willing to listen to music when experiencing pain in healthcare, and 2) which music genres they choose, in light of their national context, background characteristics, and overall music preferences. In addition, we investigate the universality of the so-called ‘Mozart effect’, which describes the belief that classical music is superior in healthcare, despite research suggesting that favorite music, irrespective of genre, is most effective. To answer these questions, we use data from the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry's international survey (2023), which includes twenty countries and 33,629 participants. In total, a large majority (86.5%) wants to listen to music when experiencing pain in healthcare. Although participants predominantly select music in line with their favorite music genres (73.1%), a smaller trend toward selecting classical music – in line with the ‘Mozart effect’ – is observed. Among those who prefer to listen to a music genre that they did not list as their favorite, classical music is predominantly chosen (43.3%). Furthermore, there are notable differences between national populations and across social groups in terms of preference for music when experiencing pain. These insights can be crucial for implementing music in healthcare worldwide, emphasizing the need for a culturally sensitive and personalized approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47780,"journal":{"name":"Ssm-Population Health","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101758"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ssm-Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827325000126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Music is increasingly investigated in healthcare to manage pain, anxiety and stress. Previous studies have demonstrated that listening to (preferred) music is effective for pain relief, but rarely explore whether people are open to instrumentalizing music in healthcare. Therefore, this study investigates 1) to what extent people across twenty countries are willing to listen to music when experiencing pain in healthcare, and 2) which music genres they choose, in light of their national context, background characteristics, and overall music preferences. In addition, we investigate the universality of the so-called ‘Mozart effect’, which describes the belief that classical music is superior in healthcare, despite research suggesting that favorite music, irrespective of genre, is most effective. To answer these questions, we use data from the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry's international survey (2023), which includes twenty countries and 33,629 participants. In total, a large majority (86.5%) wants to listen to music when experiencing pain in healthcare. Although participants predominantly select music in line with their favorite music genres (73.1%), a smaller trend toward selecting classical music – in line with the ‘Mozart effect’ – is observed. Among those who prefer to listen to a music genre that they did not list as their favorite, classical music is predominantly chosen (43.3%). Furthermore, there are notable differences between national populations and across social groups in terms of preference for music when experiencing pain. These insights can be crucial for implementing music in healthcare worldwide, emphasizing the need for a culturally sensitive and personalized approach.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ssm-Population Health
Ssm-Population Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
298
审稿时长
101 days
期刊介绍: SSM - Population Health. The new online only, open access, peer reviewed journal in all areas relating Social Science research to population health. SSM - Population Health shares the same Editors-in Chief and general approach to manuscripts as its sister journal, Social Science & Medicine. The journal takes a broad approach to the field especially welcoming interdisciplinary papers from across the Social Sciences and allied areas. SSM - Population Health offers an alternative outlet for work which might not be considered, or is classed as ''out of scope'' elsewhere, and prioritizes fast peer review and publication to the benefit of authors and readers. The journal welcomes all types of paper from traditional primary research articles, replication studies, short communications, methodological studies, instrument validation, opinion pieces, literature reviews, etc. SSM - Population Health also offers the opportunity to publish special issues or sections to reflect current interest and research in topical or developing areas. The journal fully supports authors wanting to present their research in an innovative fashion though the use of multimedia formats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信