Relative technological diversification measure using patent data: Analysis of firms’ strategies in the Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) sector

IF 2.2 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Katsuyuki Kaneko , Yuya Kajikawa
{"title":"Relative technological diversification measure using patent data: Analysis of firms’ strategies in the Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) sector","authors":"Katsuyuki Kaneko ,&nbsp;Yuya Kajikawa","doi":"10.1016/j.wpi.2024.102333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Technological diversification of firms is an essential research topic as it has significant effects on their performance. However, we still lack consistent results whether the diversification has positive effects. We focus on the relevance of its measures as one of the causes of the inconsistency. This study aims to develop a technological diversification measure by including relativity of firms' technological portfolio, because major conventional methods, e.g., Herfindahl–Hirschmann Index and entropy, consider only one firm's absolute portfolio. We analyzed each firm's relative position from a common core of the industrial technologies for four global major firms in Fast Moving Consumer Goods sector. The product set of International Patent Classification (IPC) among them was defined as the core of industrial technology. We quantified firms' chronical shifts from there, and compared them with those by conventional methods. The proposed measure clarified the firms' relative positions in a manner that conventional ones cannot identify. The firms' qualitative information supported the validity of the observations. Our approach can take more IPC data into account, less affected by the largest number of IPC, which are among its advantages; it further allows for analysis from new aspects that complement the conventional “absolute technological portfolio” measures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51794,"journal":{"name":"World Patent Information","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 102333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Patent Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172219024000735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technological diversification of firms is an essential research topic as it has significant effects on their performance. However, we still lack consistent results whether the diversification has positive effects. We focus on the relevance of its measures as one of the causes of the inconsistency. This study aims to develop a technological diversification measure by including relativity of firms' technological portfolio, because major conventional methods, e.g., Herfindahl–Hirschmann Index and entropy, consider only one firm's absolute portfolio. We analyzed each firm's relative position from a common core of the industrial technologies for four global major firms in Fast Moving Consumer Goods sector. The product set of International Patent Classification (IPC) among them was defined as the core of industrial technology. We quantified firms' chronical shifts from there, and compared them with those by conventional methods. The proposed measure clarified the firms' relative positions in a manner that conventional ones cannot identify. The firms' qualitative information supported the validity of the observations. Our approach can take more IPC data into account, less affected by the largest number of IPC, which are among its advantages; it further allows for analysis from new aspects that complement the conventional “absolute technological portfolio” measures.
企业的技术多元化是一个重要的研究课题,因为它对企业的绩效有重大影响。然而,我们仍然缺乏关于多元化是否具有积极影响的一致结果。我们将重点放在衡量标准的相关性上,这是造成不一致的原因之一。由于赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数(Herfindahl-Hirschmann Index)和熵(entropy)等主要传统方法只考虑一家公司的绝对技术组合,本研究旨在开发一种包含公司技术组合相对性的技术多元化衡量方法。我们从快速消费品行业四家全球主要公司的共同核心产业技术出发,分析了每家公司的相对地位。它们之间的国际专利分类(IPC)产品集被定义为产业技术核心。在此基础上,我们对企业的时序转移进行了量化,并与传统方法进行了比较。所提出的衡量标准明确了企业的相对位置,这是传统方法所无法识别的。企业的定性信息支持了观察结果的有效性。我们的方法可以考虑更多的 IPC 数据,较少受到 IPC 数量最多的影响,这是它的优势之一;它还允许从新的方面进行分析,补充了传统的 "绝对技术组合 "衡量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Patent Information
World Patent Information INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The aim of World Patent Information is to provide a worldwide forum for the exchange of information between people working professionally in the field of Industrial Property information and documentation and to promote the widest possible use of the associated literature. Regular features include: papers concerned with all aspects of Industrial Property information and documentation; new regulations pertinent to Industrial Property information and documentation; short reports on relevant meetings and conferences; bibliographies, together with book and literature reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信